Sun Dec 27, 2009 7:46 pm
Sun Dec 27, 2009 7:51 pm
Sun Dec 27, 2009 8:19 pm
Sun Dec 27, 2009 9:12 pm
Sun Dec 27, 2009 9:19 pm
Sun Dec 27, 2009 10:21 pm
The X wrote:#2 The (Overrated) Flu Game
Sun Dec 27, 2009 10:47 pm
Andrew wrote:The X wrote:#2 The (Overrated) Flu Game
Come on now.
Sun Dec 27, 2009 11:05 pm
Mon Dec 28, 2009 12:23 am
Mon Dec 28, 2009 12:37 am
Mon Dec 28, 2009 1:53 am
Mon Dec 28, 2009 2:35 am
Mon Dec 28, 2009 10:26 am
Mon Dec 28, 2009 11:16 am
Andrew wrote:Even putting aside my Bulls bias, I'd say it was a great game between two great teams that came down to the wire; the kind of thing you want to see in the NBA Finals. There's Jordan's performance while feeling under the weather and on the road in one of the most difficult venues to win in (then and in recent seasons), the current and soon-to-be Hall of Famers involved and the meaningful nature of the game (a pivotal Game 5 in the NBA Finals) which are all significant factors but on top of that, I'd call it a really good game of basketball to watch.
If you're going to rank the flu game lower then frankly I think you've got to knock Wilt's 100 point game down a few notches, too. I know it sounds sacrilege to say that but if we're talking about the quality of the game then I don't know that it's the greatest game of all-time given that from all accounts, it turned into a complete farce in the final minutes with Wilt's teammates force feeding him the ball and the Knicks fouling on every trip down the floor, in a game where the result had long since been decided and become an afterthought. It's meaningful in that Wilt's 100 is a staggering record but as for the game itself? It doesn't sound like an all-time classic, the record aside it's a regular season blowout. I'd say it better fits the description of a game that isn't all that great outside one great individual performance.
Mon Dec 28, 2009 1:12 pm
Mon Dec 28, 2009 2:54 pm
Mon Dec 28, 2009 4:53 pm
The X wrote:But if you were to look at it the other way, if The Mailman had delivered with bad flu in game 5 & MJ had choked time & time again in the 4th quarter then I have no doubt that historians would not call it the #2 greatest NBA game of All-Time. Heck, even if it was Pippen (in my eyes he was the true 2007 Finals MVP) or Kukoc who had that same game as MJ did, it wouldn't have been considered top 2, maybe not even top 20.
Mon Dec 28, 2009 8:52 pm
shadowGrinch wrote:The X wrote:But if you were to look at it the other way, if The Mailman had delivered with bad flu in game 5 & MJ had choked time & time again in the 4th quarter then I have no doubt that historians would not call it the #2 greatest NBA game of All-Time. Heck, even if it was Pippen (in my eyes he was the true 2007 Finals MVP) or Kukoc who had that same game as MJ did, it wouldn't have been considered top 2, maybe not even top 20.
Stop posting when you're drunk X. There's the Drunk thread for that.
Mon Dec 28, 2009 9:13 pm
Mon Dec 28, 2009 9:33 pm
Tue Dec 29, 2009 1:19 am
Tue Dec 29, 2009 1:48 am
koberulz wrote:most talented player in the NBA today
Tue Dec 29, 2009 2:31 am
Tue Dec 29, 2009 5:06 am
Tue Dec 29, 2009 9:15 am