Tue Dec 15, 2009 10:57 pm
Sit wrote:
hova- wrote:Oh and actually I am using those score tables for my dynasty and I will also use the standings for my November recap. Did not know there were bugs, but I definitely like the feature.
2k is really great in terms of presenting a dynasty as you can upload pictures and replays decently. Sucks that there is no "complete" boxscore though, as I have to take ugly pics with my cam then.
Tue Dec 15, 2009 11:03 pm
The X wrote:Sit wrote:
I preferred old one
Wed Dec 16, 2009 12:35 am
Wed Dec 16, 2009 12:44 am
Wed Dec 16, 2009 1:22 am
Wed Dec 16, 2009 1:55 am
Wed Dec 16, 2009 8:56 am
Wed Dec 16, 2009 9:17 am
Wed Dec 16, 2009 6:31 pm
Wed Dec 16, 2009 7:45 pm
hova- wrote:I like that youre giving some PT to Ilyasova (at least against the Blazers). This guy can play. Imho your goal must be to get a decent bigman and more firepower off the bench.
Redd and Jennings are a very nice combo as you can drive&kick very well with Jennings. Mbah A Moute does not really profit from that ability though, as his three ball sucks. I don't know, I just don't like Small Forwards who cannot shoot. For the bench, especially your frontcourt is very thing with Warrick and Gadzuric. I would try to move Ridnour. I'm not a big friend of early trades though, you know. Maybe you just play some games and find out who you really need and who you could give away.
Wed Dec 16, 2009 7:59 pm
Wed Dec 16, 2009 8:02 pm
Wed Dec 16, 2009 8:38 pm
hova- wrote:For the 2010 FA class, I would not count on that. Most guys pull their options (lil clue: change their roles to benchwarmers before offseason and changer their personality to unpredictable -> bigger chance to see guys like Bosh leaving) and thus you could have a lot of cap room and no one to sign.
Mark. wrote:Yeah I would deffinately look to offload Redd if the right offer comes in. Without going into contract details at all, a trade that appealed to me that I saw happen in 2k10 was Redd for Brand, to me that works well for the Bucks solely on a talent basis. However i'm pretty sure Brand's contract still has some time to run so this wouldn't help your cap situation at all. I think if Redd is moved you really need to bring in a decent wing player just to open things up a little.
hova- wrote:Getting rid of Redd would definitely not be unrealistic. There have been talks about moving him for almost a year now. I could truely understand if you moved him because he is not the go-to-guy you wanna give a Shaq/Kobe/Dirk- like contract. I don't know though, wether it would be better to get back expiring contracts or young talent. You already have many gifted players, but I do not see you having a shot at a guy like Bosh (nobody wants to go to Milwaukee). A mixture would be great i.e. getting one or two expiring contracts and a talented player in return or the other way around.
Wed Dec 16, 2009 8:44 pm
Wed Dec 16, 2009 8:49 pm
Sit wrote:Time to dump Redd and make Bogut the face of this franchise. I know in real life, Bogut is not a franchise center, but video game Bogut might be!
Wed Dec 16, 2009 9:00 pm
Wed Dec 16, 2009 9:01 pm
Wed Dec 16, 2009 9:08 pm
X wrote:hova- wrote:For the 2010 FA class, I would not count on that. Most guys pull their options (lil clue: change their roles to benchwarmers before offseason and changer their personality to unpredictable -> bigger chance to see guys like Bosh leaving) and thus you could have a lot of cap room and no one to sign.
Don't know if I want to do that. I don't mind if players stay put. I do have trade override ON just in case CPU does anything stupid (except for Grizzlies, I'll just let them do what they do) like stocking up three starting PG's. Hopefully I don't have to use it much (or at all). Might be handy to use to do some re-jigging of future draft picks to match real life though.
Wed Dec 16, 2009 9:23 pm
dare wrote:Nice OT win despite Redd's bad shooting, BTW i noticed the standings and was shocked that NY Knicks is second in the East, what is their line-up do they get Lebron James or something their playing pretty good![]()
![]()
Mark. wrote:Yeah I agree on the Brand thing, the only way I see it as a viable move is sort of a sideways move but at the same time to fill a need, ie you are getting decent enough performances from your other guards but are too weak up front but still not far off a playoff spot so moving for a player that is a similar talent level (lets not forget in game Brand will likely play better than RL Brand), age and contract burden may just give you that extra kick your team needs. Once again though im not sure the contracts or Redd and Brand are the same or not.
hova- wrote:I understand that, for me it's just like, if the Raptors don't make the Playoffs, I will change his role and personality and look what happens. Maybe he will pull his option, would not be too unrealistic, but if he leaves that wasn't unrealistic either with the Raptors not making the Playoffs once again.
I would not change it if I felt there should be no reason for the guys to leave.
For the trade thing, I have override on, too, but I also have CPU trades off for 27 days per month. The CPU does silly deals all the time. So if they want to trade they get 3-4 days per month where they can do whatever they want. This limits the trades very well for me.
Sat Dec 19, 2009 1:57 pm
Sat Dec 19, 2009 3:39 pm
Sat Dec 19, 2009 7:23 pm
Sat Dec 19, 2009 11:22 pm
Lamrock wrote:that blog thing is awesome. Tough loss though. I watched (the second half of) my first Bucks game this season. They lost, but they almost recovered from a late 15 point deficit. Love the team's hustle, especially on D. Jennings was trash, but Ersan Ilyasova really impressed me. Really fun to watch.
hova- wrote:Tough loss against LA and at least a win against the Pistons (even if it wasn't a beauty). Very realistic so far. The Pistons are the slowest team in the league I read yesterday, so the result is what you'd expect in real life.
For the Lakers game and your concerncs inside, I guess we are sharing the same problems here with the only difference being that you have Bogut whilst I have Wallace and Jackson who grab at least some boards per game. But regarding defence and inside scoring, I have the same problems. But it's tough to get a good inside scorer because these are usually the attributes which separate the stars from the good. Thus inside scorers are very expensive. Will be interesting who you plan to give up.
Nice writing by the way, always liked your recaps!
Sun Dec 20, 2009 3:15 am
Sun Dec 20, 2009 10:28 am