Lineup synergy
Mon Jul 28, 2008 7:15 pm
I found that sometimes the lower-rated players can contribute to a higher lineup synergy. anyone knows why?
my team in third season:
C Horford (81)
PF K.Mart (81)
SF Harpring (72)
SG Gordon (81)
PG Conley (81)
In fact I have Rudy Gay (81), but when I put him to the starting 5, substituting Harpring, the lineup synergy reduced significantly.
Cheers,
my team in third season:
C Horford (81)
PF K.Mart (81)
SF Harpring (72)
SG Gordon (81)
PG Conley (81)
In fact I have Rudy Gay (81), but when I put him to the starting 5, substituting Harpring, the lineup synergy reduced significantly.
Cheers,
Tue Jul 29, 2008 12:55 am
I would assume the lower rated players have a more favourable chemistry attribute, representing their willingness to be role players in a lineup that features prominent scorers.
Tue Jul 29, 2008 5:24 pm
In fact I have Rudy Gay (81)?
Rudy Gay dun have got Team Talent i mean he's Team Chemistry is always BAD
Rudy Gay dun have got Team Talent i mean he's Team Chemistry is always BAD
Fri Aug 01, 2008 8:27 pm
yeah i agree to that that is y i always make a line that is more realistic...i mean you cant put howard stoudamire mcgrady and nash in one team i mean this guys is top scorer in their teams imagine that in real life common...am sure it wont work(e.g. previous lakers...o neal bryant malone and payton)