Lamrock wrote:No to Washington. Thierry (for the time) is using them, and they sort of bore me. I like the other 3 options a lot. Houston intrigues me the most, and I might do a Rockets association after Nellieball, but thats a ways down the road. You using the Blazers would be awesome, but contenders aren't that fun to use - at least to me. Knicks are just horrible.
I would go with the decimated Rockets. No T-Mac? No Yao? No problem. Still would prefer Minnesota though, but that might just because I'm on the Ramon Sessions Bandwagon.
Rockets would be good. Always loved dominating with Yao Ming.

Cleveland wins wrote:Maybe the knicks because of all the "possible" trade opportunities, in real life the knicks are trying to clear cap space for the summer of 2010 and maybe you can do the same, and try to get Lebron or Wade or something.
I was thinking the same thing about building a team with the cap space in New York.
Another vote for Houston.

badreligionau wrote:I thought OKC was an alright team to rebuild. Durant, Westbrook and Green + 10 million in cap room... but each to their own I guess
This is why I'm not going to use OKCLamrock wrote:you aren't aware of the fact that he has an active 2K9 association that is essentially a Thunder association.
Blasphemy. Agreed?
