Sit's Rockets Dynasty

Tell stories based on your franchise and career mode games here.

Sit's Rockets Dynasty

Postby Fresh8 on Mon Nov 02, 2009 11:09 pm

HOUSTON ROCKETS DYNASTY

Don’t expect anything special here. And also, the dynatsy starts more than halfway down the page. You’ve been warned.

DYNASTY SETTINGS

Difficulty: All-Star/Superstar
Roster: Props to NLSC for the PC Mod (Rosters accurate as of start of 09/10 season)
Quarter Length: 8 min
Sin quarter length: 12 min
Games: 82
Playoff Format: 7-7-7-7

TEAM ROSTER

Image
Last edited by Fresh8 on Fri Nov 27, 2009 8:55 am, edited 15 times in total.
User avatar
Fresh8
The poster formerly known as Sit
 
Posts: 14872
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2002 5:19 pm

Re: Sit's Dynasty

Postby Fresh8 on Mon Nov 02, 2009 11:10 pm

Hey everyone. After fixing up my desktop and finding Live 06, I was feeling like trying the PC project on NBA Live 06. So when version 3.3 of the mod comes out, I think I'm going to start a dynasty.

Any ideas on which team to play at would be great. :)
User avatar
Fresh8
The poster formerly known as Sit
 
Posts: 14872
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2002 5:19 pm

Re: Sit's Dynasty

Postby Kenny on Mon Nov 02, 2009 11:13 pm

If you're playing updated rosters, I like Oklahoma City.
User avatar
Kenny
Thon Maker's Biggest Fan.
NLSC Team Member
 
Posts: 3688
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2007 7:37 pm
Location: Brisbane, Australia

Re: Sit's Dynasty

Postby Martti. on Tue Nov 03, 2009 1:43 am

Yes, some life in this section. :) Miami is great and so are the Rockets for example. But they might not be what you're looking for.

So you'll run this alongside ALIB II? The more, the merrier. :)
User avatar
Martti.
#HeatLifer
 
Posts: 8101
Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2006 5:19 am

Re: Sit's Dynasty

Postby Fresh8 on Tue Nov 03, 2009 1:45 am

badreligionau wrote:If you're playing updated rosters, I like Oklahoma City.


I think I will pass. :)

Martti. wrote:Yes, some life in this section. :) Miami is great and so are the Rockets for example. But they might not be what you're looking for.


Not sure what I am looking for. Houston sounds intriguing. Not a fan of Miami. :)

Martti. wrote:So you'll run this alongside ALIB II? The more, the merrier. :)


Yeah man. Hopefully will have the time for it. ALIB II comes first though.
User avatar
Fresh8
The poster formerly known as Sit
 
Posts: 14872
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2002 5:19 pm

Re: Sit's Dynasty

Postby Dee. on Tue Nov 03, 2009 6:27 am

I'd say choose a team,that wouldn't get a chance to win the Championship.
Maybe Knicks,Wolves,Clippers or Suns. :)
Bobcats would be the best !
User avatar
Dee.
 
Posts: 1397
Joined: Fri Jun 12, 2009 6:56 am
Location: Lithuania

Re: Sit's Dynasty

Postby Cartar on Tue Nov 03, 2009 6:38 am

badreligionau wrote:If you're playing updated rosters, I like Oklahoma City.


Sorry, but I had to laugh at that, no offence.(Sit is using Oklahoma City already in his main dynasty(association), but only changed the team name to Seattle Stealth, that's why I had to laugh) Anyway, maybe Timberwolves, Portland or Atlanta?
Cartar
 
Posts: 2600
Joined: Wed May 02, 2007 10:02 pm

Re: Sit's Dynasty

Postby Lamrock on Tue Nov 03, 2009 9:45 am

Go with Minnesota man. ALIB II should always come first, but I'll follow this. Good luck, and go with Minnesota.
Image
User avatar
Lamrock
 
Posts: 10936
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 4:02 pm
Location: Washington State

Re: Sit's Dynasty

Postby Fresh8 on Tue Nov 03, 2009 10:12 am

TheDee wrote:I'd say choose a team,that wouldn't get a chance to win the Championship.
Maybe Knicks,Wolves,Clippers or Suns. :)
Bobcats would be the best !


I'm sort of sick of building a team to contend. Out of all the teams mentioned, I like the Knicks.

Cartar wrote:
badreligionau wrote:If you're playing updated rosters, I like Oklahoma City.


Sorry, but I had to laugh at that, no offence.(Sit is using Oklahoma City already in his main dynasty(association), but only changed the team name to Seattle Stealth, that's why I had to laugh) Anyway, maybe Timberwolves, Portland or Atlanta?


I was laughing too. Out of those three, I like the Blazers.

Lamrock wrote:Go with Minnesota man. ALIB II should always come first, but I'll follow this. Good luck, and go with Minnesota.


No to Minnesota. :)

So comes down to: Houston or Portland or New York or Washington
Anyone got any major preference out of those four teams?
User avatar
Fresh8
The poster formerly known as Sit
 
Posts: 14872
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2002 5:19 pm

Re: Sit's Dynasty - Rockets, Blazers, Knicks, Wizards?

Postby Lamrock on Tue Nov 03, 2009 10:23 am

No to Washington. Thierry (for the time) is using them, and they sort of bore me. I like the other 3 options a lot. Houston intrigues me the most, and I might do a Rockets association after Nellieball, but thats a ways down the road. You using the Blazers would be awesome, but contenders aren't that fun to use - at least to me. Knicks are just horrible.

I would go with the decimated Rockets. No T-Mac? No Yao? No problem. Still would prefer Minnesota though, but that might just because I'm on the Ramon Sessions Bandwagon.
Image
User avatar
Lamrock
 
Posts: 10936
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 4:02 pm
Location: Washington State

Re: Sit's Dynasty - Rockets, Blazers, Knicks, Wizards?

Postby Cleveland wins on Tue Nov 03, 2009 10:40 am

Maybe the knicks because of all the "possible" trade opportunities, in real life the knicks are trying to clear cap space for the summer of 2010 and maybe you can do the same, and try to get Lebron or Wade or something.
Cleveland wins
 
Posts: 1068
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 6:49 am

Re: Sit's Dynasty - Rockets, Blazers, Knicks, Wizards?

Postby dare on Tue Nov 03, 2009 10:49 am

go with houston, Ariza is a good player and maybe a comeback of the old Tmac??? :D :D :D
User avatar
dare
True kings have rings
 
Posts: 3966
Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2009 8:19 pm
Location: Somewhere

Re: Sit's Dynasty - Rockets, Blazers, Knicks, Wizards?

Postby Kenny on Tue Nov 03, 2009 10:51 am

I thought OKC was an alright team to rebuild. Durant, Westbrook and Green + 10 million in cap room... but each to their own I guess
User avatar
Kenny
Thon Maker's Biggest Fan.
NLSC Team Member
 
Posts: 3688
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2007 7:37 pm
Location: Brisbane, Australia

Re: Sit's Dynasty - Rockets, Blazers, Knicks, Wizards?

Postby Lamrock on Tue Nov 03, 2009 11:03 am

you aren't aware of the fact that he has an active 2K9 association that is essentially a Thunder association.
Image
User avatar
Lamrock
 
Posts: 10936
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 4:02 pm
Location: Washington State

Re: Sit's Dynasty - Rockets, Blazers, Knicks, Wizards?

Postby Fresh8 on Tue Nov 03, 2009 11:08 am

Lamrock wrote:No to Washington. Thierry (for the time) is using them, and they sort of bore me. I like the other 3 options a lot. Houston intrigues me the most, and I might do a Rockets association after Nellieball, but thats a ways down the road. You using the Blazers would be awesome, but contenders aren't that fun to use - at least to me. Knicks are just horrible.

I would go with the decimated Rockets. No T-Mac? No Yao? No problem. Still would prefer Minnesota though, but that might just because I'm on the Ramon Sessions Bandwagon.


Rockets would be good. Always loved dominating with Yao Ming. :)

Cleveland wins wrote:Maybe the knicks because of all the "possible" trade opportunities, in real life the knicks are trying to clear cap space for the summer of 2010 and maybe you can do the same, and try to get Lebron or Wade or something.


I was thinking the same thing about building a team with the cap space in New York.

dare019 wrote:go with houston, Ariza is a good player and maybe a comeback of the old Tmac??? :D :D :D


Another vote for Houston. (Y)

badreligionau wrote:I thought OKC was an alright team to rebuild. Durant, Westbrook and Green + 10 million in cap room... but each to their own I guess


This is why I'm not going to use OKC

Lamrock wrote:you aren't aware of the fact that he has an active 2K9 association that is essentially a Thunder association.


Blasphemy. Agreed? :lol:
User avatar
Fresh8
The poster formerly known as Sit
 
Posts: 14872
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2002 5:19 pm

Re: Sit's Dynasty - Rockets, Blazers, Knicks, Wizards?

Postby Kenny on Tue Nov 03, 2009 11:23 am

Ah yeah, I have to admit I don't look in that section a whole lot. With that in mind, I think Chicago or Memphis... all depends on whether you want to rebuild a team or get a ring straight away.

*edit* out of those 4, probably the rockets imo
User avatar
Kenny
Thon Maker's Biggest Fan.
NLSC Team Member
 
Posts: 3688
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2007 7:37 pm
Location: Brisbane, Australia

Re: Sit's Dynasty - Rockets, Blazers, Knicks, Wizards?

Postby cavs4872 on Tue Nov 03, 2009 11:26 am

I would love to see a Pacers dynasty. (Y) Out of the teams you suggested though, I would go with either the Knicks or the Rockets. More preferably the Knicks.
User avatar
cavs4872
 
Posts: 2186
Joined: Mon May 25, 2009 7:30 am
Location: Cleveland, OH

Re: Sit's Dynasty - Rockets, Blazers, Knicks, Wizards?

Postby Fresh8 on Tue Nov 03, 2009 11:33 am

badreligionau wrote:Ah yeah, I have to admit I don't look in that section a whole lot. With that in mind, I think Chicago or Memphis... all depends on whether you want to rebuild a team or get a ring straight away.

*edit* out of those 4, probably the rockets imo


That's cool. :) No to the Bulls and the Grizzlies!

XxHyperDunk24 wrote:I would love to see a Pacers dynasty. (Y) Out of the teams you suggested though, I would go with either the Knicks or the Rockets. More preferably the Knicks.


Come down to either Knicks or Rockets. I'm very much 50-50.
User avatar
Fresh8
The poster formerly known as Sit
 
Posts: 14872
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2002 5:19 pm

Re: Sit's Dynasty - Rockets or Knicks?

Postby Lamrock on Tue Nov 03, 2009 11:34 am

GO WITH THE ROCKETS.
Image
User avatar
Lamrock
 
Posts: 10936
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 4:02 pm
Location: Washington State

Re: Sit's Dynasty - Rockets or Knicks?

Postby dare on Tue Nov 03, 2009 11:55 am

go rockets go... i would love to see if Tmac can past the 1st round...
User avatar
dare
True kings have rings
 
Posts: 3966
Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2009 8:19 pm
Location: Somewhere

Re: Sit's Dynasty - Rockets or Knicks?

Postby Fresh8 on Tue Nov 03, 2009 11:59 am

Lamrock wrote:
GO WITH THE ROCKETS.

dare019 wrote:go rockets go... i would love to see if Tmac can past the 1st round...


Perhaps I should go with the popular choice. :)

Updated first post.
User avatar
Fresh8
The poster formerly known as Sit
 
Posts: 14872
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2002 5:19 pm

Re: Sit's Dynasty - Rockets or Knicks?

Postby Lamrock on Tue Nov 03, 2009 12:04 pm

Gotta be Houston. Such an intriguing concept and the consensus favorite. Make David Andersen a star.
Image
User avatar
Lamrock
 
Posts: 10936
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 4:02 pm
Location: Washington State

Re: Sit's Dynasty - Rockets or Knicks?

Postby dare on Tue Nov 03, 2009 12:16 pm

Lamrock wrote:Make David Andersen a star.


And get Mills.. Australian Team LOL
User avatar
dare
True kings have rings
 
Posts: 3966
Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2009 8:19 pm
Location: Somewhere

Re: Sit's Dynasty - Rockets or Knicks?

Postby kibaxx7 on Tue Nov 03, 2009 12:39 pm

Houston man!
× Club Atlético Independiente. ×
× Watched:
Mission: Impossible – The Final Reckoning (2025), Deadly Circuit (1983), For Sama (2019) ×
User avatar
kibaxx7
キバレンジャー
 
Posts: 12673
Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2004 11:34 am
Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina

Re: Sit's Dynasty - Rockets or Knicks?

Postby C-77 on Tue Nov 03, 2009 1:17 pm

Rockets! :mrgreen:
Image
|Proud to be a Bedan|Bryan_C. is my cousin|Celtics & Magic fan|Pinoy Ako|

Follow me on Twitter


{♣NBA LIVE IS STILL LIVE!!♣}
User avatar
C-77
We Do It For The City,We Do It for the fans
 
Posts: 1039
Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2008 11:58 pm
Location: Cainta,Rizal Philippines

Next

Return to Stories from the Virtual Hardwood

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests