KNICKS NOTEBOOK
Brown vs. Marbury Is Tried in the Press
Larry Brown and Stephon Marbury spent another day in a rhetorical standoff, using reporters as their debate forum while curiously declining to confront each other directly.
If they have reached an impasse in their young relationship, neither would say so. But they made no attempt to put a positive spin on it, either. Instead, they each stuck to their respective positions about last week’s loss to Detroit, which ended with Brown questioning Marbury's reluctance to shoot and Marbury insisting he was doing what the coach wanted.
They did not speak on the Knicks' late-night flight to Seattle, nor before Thursday's practice in Utah. For almost a week, their feelings were passed by proxy, through the news media.
"It's over, in my mind," Brown said. "I've got 12 guys suited up and 15 guys on the team and we've got to try to get better. So that’s been my focus this week and during the road-trip."
The tension between point guard and coach is not the primary reason for the Knicks' 5-17 record, just the most glaring. But it is disconcerting enough that it prompted Marbury to issue an unprovoked plea for patience to his employers Thursday.
Marbury, asked again about Brown's critique of his passive performances, responded with a non sequitur that implied a much deeper concern: that the team's failures, and his own, could hasten his departure from New York, his hometown.
"Man, I love New York, and I want to be here more than anything," said Marbury, who was acquired in January 2003. "And whatever it's going to take for me to win, I'm going to do it. Because I feel like New York deserves it. When I first came here, that's the only thing I wanted to do, was win and be a part of the New York tradition. And I finally got the opportunity, and whatever it's going to take for me to do to win, that's what I'm going to do. And if it's sacrificing my game, I'm willing to do that."
Generally terse with reporters, Marbury was unusually garrulous. He took the rare step of mentioning James L. Dolan, the Madison Square Garden chairman, by name. But Marbury also sounded fatalistic about the consequences of continued strife.
"I play to win and I play it to feed my family," Marbury said. "And I love Mr. Dolan for that. And I love him for bringing me here. or us, once we all get to the point where we've had enough, then that's when it's going to be enough."
Clearly, Marbury hopes that "enough" has not yet arrived, that he has not reached a breaking point in his relationship with Brown, no matter how fragile the partnership seems.
The Knicks cannot afford to reach that breaking point, either. Brown and Marbury are both practically immovable; Brown because he signed a five-year, $50 million contract in July, and Marbury because he is owed $77 million over the next four seasons.
The Knicks have gone 65-91 and are on their fourth head coach since Marbury arrived, and for the first time he has become the target of fans' discontent. He was booed at two recent home games.
Brown has generally been protective of Marbury, praising his effort even on nights when Marbury's performance was substandard. But this is the second time the coach has publicly criticized Marbury, who was clearly irked by it. He twice declined to answer questions about their relationship and seemed uninterested in clearing up the current disagreement over his shot selection.
"I don't need to talk to him," Marbury said of Brown. "He needs to come and tell me what he wants me to do if that's what he feels is the case. When he came here, I was willing to make a sacrifice, and I'm still willing to do that. I'm still willing to do whatever it takes to win in New York."
At Brown's behest, Marbury has been working to pass more and dominate the ball less. He is shooting less and scoring less than at any time in the last eight years. In shooting only once versus Detroit and then taking 13 shots in the first quarter in another loss to Golden State he appeared to take the directive too far.
After reviewing the game film, Brown said it "wasn't a typical Stephon Marbury game."
"He had a lot of good looks that he didn't look to take," Brown said. "And I think you can hurt your team by doing that. If we're going to be successful, he's got to get guys shots because he's a scorer and he creates attention, and he's got to get his own shot."
If it sounds as though Marbury is caught between conflicting directives, he is. "There's no in-between with me," he said.
Marbury cited the high-scoring performances against Orlando by Eddy Curry (22 points) and Jamal Crawford (18 points) as justification for shooting less, saying, "I made the pass to the guy that was open, and sacrificed my shot."
So there is confusion and tension and perhaps it should all be expected as the dogmatic, old-school coach tries to mesh with the younger, hard-headed point guard. They seem to agree on one critical issue, though - that their relationship is "the most important thing," in Marbury's words.
"I have to be an extension of him" on the court, Marbury said. "The lines of communication always have to be open. It's a process that's taking place every day. Every day I'm trying to get better at doing exactly what he wants."
TONIGHTS GAME
The Knicks will hope to finish their long west coast trip on a positive note as they look to go home with a win against the Utah Jazz.
(written by Howard Beck, I edited so it would fit with my dynasty story)