Thu Jun 25, 2009 5:16 pm
MikeMan™ wrote:First time I actually someone so serious with this kind of thing . . .
Well your seriousness in doing this lead to a masterpiece . . .
Hope that this will be nominated sometime in the future . . .
Sit wrote:Ratchuk led me to a Championship with the Lakers.Although he was British in my game. Greek sounds better due to his name.
BaronDavis1 wrote:Fredrik Ratchuk Could be a nice Pg,but for a PG he has a really low passing rating.
Andrew wrote:Ratchuk would perhaps stand out as the best choice if not for his passing ability. What's his development potential like?
Martti. wrote:Ratchuk seems to make a nice back-up at the point for Calderon! Of course, if luck should strike, take Askins!
Andrew wrote:No question, if he slips to third I'd say he's the one to pick.
I also realised that I overlooked Potential in your scouting reports. That certainly makes Ratchuk a bit more iffy, if his potential was better you might be able to get away with a bit of focused training to improve his ballhandling skills but you really do want more out of a point guard right out of the gate.
Thu Jun 25, 2009 6:12 pm
Thu Jun 25, 2009 6:32 pm
Thu Jun 25, 2009 7:35 pm
Sun Jun 28, 2009 2:00 pm
Sun Jun 28, 2009 2:51 pm
Mon Jun 29, 2009 4:19 am
Mon Jun 29, 2009 4:29 am
Andrew wrote:True, you can get kind of get around it moving the ball in the half court and feeding the post. It'd be worse if his dribbling was way down as well since he'd be losing the ball a lot whenever you try to shake someone with a crossover. With a lower passing rating he'd do alright, but he'd probably throw his fair share of long passes on the break out of bounds or straight into the opponent's hands.
hova- wrote:I like it. Youre getting into it. I'd rather bring back Marion and draft Ratchuk. You need decent defenders and especially Marion can lockdown different positions. Terrell will help you on offense but maybe you can find some better offensive fits on other positions.
BaronDavis1 wrote:I Agree with hova- u should bring back Marion and draft Ratchuk.
Lamrock wrote:Its a shame you don't have real draftees but a nice start nonetheless. I'm a Raptors fan, so I'll be interested to see how this goes. Keep it up.
thierryhenry50 wrote:Thinking the same as Hova too. Marion & Ratchuk... it's 3am but your writing is still ace
Mon Jun 29, 2009 4:44 am
Its_asdf wrote:Thanks for the compliment... But I honestly didn't think I did too good of a job with it.
Mon Jun 29, 2009 6:08 am
Mon Jun 29, 2009 9:10 am
Mon Jun 29, 2009 9:16 am
Mon Jun 29, 2009 9:16 am
Mon Jun 29, 2009 9:22 am
thierryhenry50 wrote:
Well, it's better than mine.
hova- wrote:I aint falling in love with any of your 2nd round prospects .. but I guess thats why they are projected late. Mayfield brings toughness and rebounding .. but at a 6-5 frame?? Looks like the nex Ike Diogu.
Peeler is a douchebag and has not developed any skill ... pure raw aggressiveness combined with decent athelticism .. I dont think you need that.
So despite the fact that he is a tweener Id go with Royal. He could score off the bench and has loads of potential. Still you could try to throw him in as a PG against slower defenders.
The writing is A+
Keep it up
Andrew wrote:If you take Ratchuk, I reckon Bane Peeler would be a decent choice in the second round if he's still available.
Mon Jun 29, 2009 9:23 am
Mon Jun 29, 2009 5:37 pm
Mon Jun 29, 2009 6:22 pm
4.Sac - Fredrik Ratchuk 6'10 PG 189lbs Greece 20 yrs
Mon Jun 29, 2009 7:15 pm
Tue Jun 30, 2009 4:15 am
Andrew wrote:Nicely done! Great job on the articles too.
hova- wrote:Well done. I guess these trades really help your team - Rodney Carney is a beast - whilst your draft pick will be really interesting to watch. I'd resign Marion and give Terrell some minutes off the bench ... Im like Phil Jackson when it comes to playing time of rookies. Still, when you notice Terrell can really contribute .. you could ship Marion for a decent big ... just suggestions.
Keep it up
Sit wrote:6'10" PG? Lamar Odom V2.0?
Tue Jun 30, 2009 5:22 am
Tue Jun 30, 2009 5:30 am
Tue Jun 30, 2009 6:09 am
Tue Jun 30, 2009 8:23 am
Tue Jun 30, 2009 10:18 am
Tue Jun 30, 2009 11:34 am