Main Site | Forum | Rules | Downloads | Wiki | Features | Podcast

NLSC Forum

Tell stories based on your franchise and career mode games here.
Post a reply

Thu Jul 21, 2005 3:41 am

Do you suggest Maggette, then? He's a good (but not great) defender, but he might be rated higher than Mobley. Otherwise, I'm not sure who else to get in exchange for Cuttino off of the Clippers roster that will help your team at SG...

Thu Jul 21, 2005 4:58 am

Well *Sensation* suggested that I could get Kittles(who is 71)
Last edited by Sac-1 on Thu Jul 21, 2005 5:55 am, edited 1 time in total.

Thu Jul 21, 2005 5:54 am

Accually never mind I just compared the players(Mobley and Kittles) and look what I got
ImageImageImageImage

Thu Jul 21, 2005 6:31 am

Sacramento vs. New Orleans
Kings win with a final score of 108-89 Kings.

Next Game:
Image

NBA News:
None

Injuries
LA Clippers
SG C.Maggette
Image

Thu Jul 21, 2005 12:10 pm

I voted yes, because I want Mobley to go to the Clippers and also see you make some changes. Why don't you try a multiplayer deal for Maggette? That would be much better. (Y)

Thu Jul 21, 2005 12:20 pm

*Sensation* wrote:I voted yes, because I want Mobley to go to the Clippers and also see you make some changes. Why don't you try a multiplayer deal for Maggette? That would be much better. (Y)


well i don't want a multiplayer trade for maggette because i don't want to give away anyone else...they are all doing well

Thu Jul 21, 2005 12:50 pm

And Mobley isn't?

Thu Jul 21, 2005 12:54 pm

*Sensation* wrote:And Mobley isn't?


well he is and thats why i made a poll

Thu Jul 21, 2005 12:57 pm

You don't make any sence, you said you're considering trading Mobley but not other players because their doing well. That would mean Mobley's not. Anyways, I don't want to argue about this all night. Imo, do a multiplayer deal for Maggette that's all.

Thu Jul 21, 2005 1:07 pm

Dont trade Mobley!

Thu Jul 21, 2005 1:07 pm

I'm thinkin about trading mobley because you suggested this so i took it into consideration.....but if you havn't suggested it i would have never gave him up......if i say i want to trade mobley dosen't mean he is not doing well...it just means that he is doing well but i want someone better.....like he is averaging 17.6(which is good) maybe I want someone that averages 20.4

Thu Jul 21, 2005 10:58 pm

about the trade dont do it
also nice win good to see your still doing your dynasty i know some people get mad when i post my shit here but on ww.raptorschat.ca (official raptors msg board) im doing a fantasy draft with other members what do u think of my roster

big ben
kenny thomas
melo
joe johnson
bibby

Thu Jul 21, 2005 11:33 pm

Kobe101 wrote:Dont trade Mobley!


Ya....I don't think I'm going to trade him because he is doing well and the other reason is that the poll is saying no with three votes and only one vote for yes

$Alston$ wrote:about the trade dont do it
also nice win good to see your still doing your dynasty i know some people get mad when i post my shit here but on ww.raptorschat.ca (official raptors msg board) im doing a fantasy draft with other members what do u think of my roster

big ben
kenny thomas
melo
joe johnson
bibby


Its looking good so far......except for Kenny Thomas....he is good but he isn't good enough for the starting lineup

Thu Jul 21, 2005 11:38 pm

{SAC-1} wrote:Its looking good so far......except for Kenny Thomas....he is good but he isn't good enough for the starting lineup

What are you talking about :?:
And look into the Maggette trade.(Y)

Thu Jul 21, 2005 11:50 pm

*Sensation* wrote:
{SAC-1} wrote:Its looking good so far......except for Kenny Thomas....he is good but he isn't good enough for the starting lineup

What are you talking about :?:
And look into the Maggette trade.(Y)


C'mon his overall is 69 or something........for the starting lineup you need a person that is like 72 to 99

Fri Jul 22, 2005 12:18 am

{SAC-1} wrote:C'mon his overall is 69 or something........for the starting lineup you need a person that is like 72 to 99

sac-1, you're one of the dumbest posters I've seen around here. If you don't know what you're talking about just don't say anything.
Last edited by Keo on Fri Jul 22, 2005 12:46 am, edited 1 time in total.

Fri Jul 22, 2005 12:22 am

*Sensation* wrote:
{SAC-1} wrote:C'mon his overall is 69 or something........for the starting lineup you need a person that is like 72 to 99

sac-1, you're on of the dumbest posters I've seen around here. If you don't know what you're talking about just don't say anything.


Their is no point of talking with you.....and if I'm one of the dumbest posters around here why do you support me in my dynasty

Fri Jul 22, 2005 12:25 am

Because you support mine and your dynasty is good, it's just that sometimes you say the dumbest things and I know you have no idea what you're talking about.

Fri Jul 22, 2005 12:30 am

*Sensation* wrote:Because you support mine and your dynasty is good, it's just that sometimes you say the dumbest things and I know you have no idea what you're talking about.


just stop wasting space in my dynasty....we could continue this somewhere else

Fri Jul 22, 2005 12:47 am

{SAC-1} wrote:just stop wasting space in my dynasty...

The only space you should be worried about is the one between your ears.

Fri Jul 22, 2005 1:02 am

I simulated my Atlanta game(no point of playing)

Kings vs. Atlanta

The Kings won with a Final score of 125-59.

Next Game:
Image

NBA News:
None

Injuries:
New York
C J.Butler
Image

Fri Jul 22, 2005 1:11 am

Good luck against the Blazers. Go for win #20! (Y)

Fri Jul 22, 2005 1:18 am

*Sensation* wrote:
{SAC-1} wrote:The Kings won with a Final score of 125-59.

Oh my goodness. :!: :shock:


Ya I know I was surprised to

Good luck against the Blazers. Go for win #20! (Y)


Thanks....they are doing better than i thought they would

Fri Jul 22, 2005 2:47 am

You're doing a pretty nice job, Sac 1. (Y) Keep on doing a good job.

Fri Jul 22, 2005 3:14 am

skateballer wrote:You're doing a pretty nice job, Sac 1. (Y) Keep on doing a good job.


Thanks..hope to see you around more
Post a reply