// Redd-Hot Dynasty! - 1-2 // Week no. 1. //

by **hammertime23** on Tue Aug 14, 2007 1:20 am

I agree with Ty-Land these are trades/moves the Bucks would never do. They would never trade there first overall pick and solid center Andrew Bogut for Tyson Chandler who has never averaged 10+ppg in his life. I know you say it was for rebounding but you could have gotten better for Bogut. Also in that Yi trade you got rid of 2 established good NBA players in Simmons and Mason, for one decent shot blocker and two young guys who haven't done anything really in the league yet. Well it should be intersting to see what your going to do with the rest of the team. I guess I'll say goodbye to Michael Redd already cause I can imagine you trading him too.

by **Martti.** on Tue Aug 14, 2007 6:48 am

No, I'm not. Why else the dynasty is called Redd-Hot?

by **Its_asdf** on Tue Aug 14, 2007 9:49 am

Definitely got a lot younger with these trades. Green and Brewer are lanky and quick, so they're pretty servicable shooters in game. Too bad I'm a Mason and Simmons fan though, I just hope you don't get burned on defence because Green and Brewer (not high on him defensively as a lot of people are) are inexperienced and are basically a downgrade from Simmons and Mason defensively.

As much as I like Tyson Chandler and Butler, I would've kept Bogut as well. Chandler's a beast on defence and the boards, but Bogut isn't necessarily a slouch in that department either. Bogut also has that underrated post passing skill. I've always felt Bogut to be more of a franchise player than Chandler, plus he makes less money.

Oh well, if your trades give you results in-game I guess it doesn't really matter anyway.

by **Martti.** on Tue Aug 21, 2007 6:20 am

Guys, what template should i use?

a) My current one? ( Can see on page 2.)
b) My Wizards Playoffs one. (Daily leaders etc..)
c) A Website template? (Like Buzzy's, Jing's and Looser's.)

by **Its_asdf** on Tue Aug 21, 2007 6:31 am

A website template is pretty easy on the eyes, but its been done before. If you can pull off something creative with it I think it'd be a great thing to do.

by **Martti.** on Tue Aug 21, 2007 6:18 pm

Voskuhl waived, Fortson signed...

The Bucks waived C Jake Voskuhl today and signed a multi-year deal with
Danny Fortson. To due teams policy, terms of the deal were not disclosed.
"An excellent rebounder... Tough defender down low... Almost impossible
to move once he gets the position..."
Harris : "We need a good big men to give us depth. Fortson is just a man to do it."

by **Cornerthree** on Tue Aug 21, 2007 6:24 pm

Very great move, Fortson(imo) is one of the most underrated players in the NBA, if he gets enough minutes, his contribution can be very useful...

by **Clutch** on Thu Aug 23, 2007 4:16 am

damn KM, you just gotta get this D rollin' already! you've got some wicked skillz/recaps from what i've seen

by **Martti.** on Thu Aug 23, 2007 4:19 am

I made one in Paint in about 3 minutes.. To get the basic picture. This will make the dynasty weekly.

(< Click me!!>)

Sure it sucks now, but whit real pics and colors it will go..

by **buzzy** on Thu Aug 23, 2007 4:29 am

Wow. Quality.

I hope you're right.

by **Martti.** on Thu Aug 23, 2007 4:37 am

Paint in about 3 minutes

by **Devin112** on Thu Aug 23, 2007 6:39 am

hey man, I wanted to sign fortson!

how much did you sign him for? i want to know if I can afford him in my dynasty

by **Martti.** on Fri Aug 24, 2007 3:20 am

Then sign him

I'll have an update up soon about the details..

by **Martti.** on Fri Aug 24, 2007 3:37 am

Bucks waive Theo Ratliff, finalize deal with FA Fortson....

The Bucks waived Theo Ratliff and his 11M dollar contract to finalize the contract with Danny Fortson..
Fortson will earn 2.9M dollars a year and the contract will be a 4 year deal. This will bring the Bucks under the Cap and probably
the Bucks could afford to sign another FA. A veteran probably...

by **Clutch** on Fri Aug 24, 2007 4:37 am

4 years? pretty long commitment; i liked Fortson when he was on GSW but he slowly gained a rep for being a dirty player after he was traded; hope he cleans up his act and dominates for your Bucks

by **Its_asdf** on Fri Aug 24, 2007 5:06 am

I'm with BoomDizzle, I'm not a huge fan of Fortson, but he was a monster rebounder a few years ago I think.

by **Martti.** on Sat Aug 25, 2007 4:48 am

Well, I'm not looking for a "beast" off the bench. I have Chandler. (94 Off Reb, 92 Def Reb. Or the other way..) at start.. Bogut was 78,78..

I'll have my 1st game up by Monday or later on tuesday. I already have a decent template. (Credits to Buzzy!)

by **Martti.** on Sun Sep 09, 2007 10:10 pm

by **Martti.** on Sun Sep 09, 2007 10:36 pm

Delete post.

by **Martti.** on Mon Sep 10, 2007 12:13 am

Delete post.

by **Clutch** on Tue Sep 11, 2007 1:13 am

nice layout (Y)

and solid game by Charlie V; can't seem to get the boxscores though :eh:

by **looser** on Tue Sep 11, 2007 2:34 am

Neither me...anyway i like more this new layout...it's better then the old one

by **buzzy** on Tue Sep 11, 2007 5:41 am

Box: http://i143.photobucket.com/albums/r136 ... 1box-1.png
And thanks, I made the template :mrgreen:

Anyway, nice you finally started this one, km. Too bad the cpu played sucky for you and you already have a 1-2 record. I think you should play against your former dynasty - the Wizards. Expecting a shooting duel between Redd and Gil.

by **Its_asdf** on Tue Sep 11, 2007 9:02 am

Damn... 44 fourth quarter points, that's pretty suprising even if the CPU was cheating.

I'm glad to see Charlie V play so well; he's been a favourite of mine since he was a Raptor and I'm still rooting for him in Milwaukee.

by **Martti.** on Wed Sep 12, 2007 4:46 am

Thanks for the feedback.. And that poll isn't down there for nothing..
Like buzzy, vote for the game you think should be played.. I may play some other games for my fun, but also I'll simulate some..

// Redd-Hot Dynasty! - 1-2 // Week no. 1. //

Who is online