by Chris_23 on Tue Jan 18, 2005 10:43 pm
Metsis, I have taken nba basketball the way it is for good seven years already, dont have personal favorites and I enjoy a good game and good players.
LeBron scored more than 25 points per gave, along with rpg and assists in default NBA Live 2005 roster simulated 04-05 season. All this with his ratings as they are in the default rosters.
The overall rating means shiet. It doesnt show objectively who to use, why to use him, and where he is succesful. I dont care really how big overalls are, I care for the things player actually does. And you say that no one has posted these numbers in the league so young before, well Michael scored 28 points per game being green as midsummer grass, also being 20 years old. But just for that reason Id not make him 90 overall. Jordan wasnt superstar in his rookie season, he had a weak team around him, just like LeBron, and posted up big numbers by taking control.
Nevertheless, MJ had 51% shooting in his rookie season, LeBron was 41% in his first season and now has 49% being almost as old as Jordan was in his rookie season. Nevertheless he would not have been 90 overall at that time. Missing in all around play being good in those couple of good things. Also, LeBrons jumpshot is weak and has low range to be real stable.
And I return to my point I made last time, LeBro will not get anywhere if he wont get another good player by his side. The greatest small guards and forwards in the history have done it with the help of other guards of forwards. Currently LeBron hasnt really got anyone to learn from, and at that age this is so important. LeBron James has the potential to become even greater player than Kobe Bryant, Im almost sure that better than Vince Carter (in his best days). But currently Im sure LeBron would be hacked in pieces in one on one contests against Kobe or T-Mac. Better defenders in the league would also create major trouble for James, since James has scored high only on games where he is not covered by strong defenders.
As for Carmelo, yes, lower, boy hasnt developed nearly at all between the seasons...
Back to LeBron James. Mark my words, if LeBron wont get another young star by his side, then he wont become one of the names to remember from 2000s.
Bird came into a solid all around team and did great things during his first season. But he got a great young team around him, with Parish and McHale, which came into one of the greatest teams ever later on.
Magic Johnson came into a strong team, with Abdul-Jabbar in it, becoming one of the other greatest teams in history.
Michael Jordan arrived in weak team that soon got Scottie Pippen in Michaels side, where Jordan went though teach-learn-by-teaching experience ending with six titles.
Malone and Stockton. Malone came into team with amazing Dantley who is perhaps the most underrated star from the 80s, six seasons in a row with about 30 points per game. Stockton coming a year earlier, and together developed into the strongest offensive in Malone end and defensive in Stocktons end duo force in NBAs history, and I think Im not overrating this.
No wonder why Miller became a shooting star with shooters like Person, Tisdale and Fleming around him.
You can also find great developments side by side in 90s. Grant Hill and Jerry Stackhouse, or Vince Carter with Tracy McGrady. Also Kobe with helluva big load of stars around him. They had great offensive-defensive athletes by their side to become the greatest. You can even mention currently so underrated Larry Hughes, who went through "defensive course" by Michael Jordan during the two wizards years. More great 90s young together developing guard-forward stars? Payton and Kemp, or Tim Duncan David Robinson. Even Shaq with Nick Anderson, though he bloomed strong in Lakers along with Kobe. Also remember Garnett, with Marbury, Gugliotta, Laettner and Rider. All of these are strong players, in their earlier developing years, needing this to develop themselves fastest and the most flexible way possible.
I repeat, if LeBron James gets someone like this on his side, then its going to be good for him. You can try and say that Gooden is such a player, but four seasons he has posted up similar numbers every season and his style of play is too different from LeBron.
I doubt Cleveland will ever want to get rid of LeBron, they have sell-out games that they really havent had for a long time, but they need a great talent by his side. There are too few instances where a player without another star alongside, becomes one of the hilight names in NBA history, and the next-Jordan-plague is a hard tag to set on anybody (poor Jeffrey Jordan if he is to come into NBA), adn you cant also forget the instances of Vince Carter and Grant Hill, whi had physical problems plenty of to strike their career hard. Hill is mentally strong and is showing what we may have missed during the seasons he was injured in, nevertheless, you need a very good developing player by the side of another developing player to have a great player in the end.
And this has got nothing to do with overalls. James is posting these 25 points and rebounds and assists in a simulated season without boosting him to totally unrealistic past 90 rating. He needs stable mid range jump shot, more active defense (though his steals are very good), and alot of this what some call "leadership".
If he gets those alright, he can become overall 90 in my book. You can make him 90 anytime by editing his statistics Metsis, but in realistic values, taking each of his ratings one by one setting it aside his real life play, LeBron James, is not 90.