Sun Dec 05, 2004 4:29 pm
Sun Dec 05, 2004 8:08 pm
Mon Dec 06, 2004 8:47 am
Mon Dec 06, 2004 11:40 am
bestclubowner wrote:they left out much more than those 2 things for sure
Mon Dec 06, 2004 11:48 am
Andrew wrote:There are indeed a couple of rules missing. However, they are prohibited from including unsportsmanlike technicals by the NBA.
Mon Dec 06, 2004 12:04 pm
Mon Dec 06, 2004 12:15 pm
Andre wrote:cos the NBA doesn't want a videogame to portrait the "wild" aspect of the league, since it might be a bad example.....
remember when in NHL 98 you could punch with another player till you knocked him down?? you would never see something like that in LIVE.
I think however that the NBA is a way too restrictive. One thing is beating up another player, another one is a flagrant foul or a technical foul to a player complaining too much. Those should be allowed in a videogame.
Mon Dec 06, 2004 4:00 pm
SAG375 wrote:Andre wrote:cos the NBA doesn't want a videogame to portrait the "wild" aspect of the league, since it might be a bad example.....
remember when in NHL 98 you could punch with another player till you knocked him down?? you would never see something like that in LIVE.
I think however that the NBA is a way too restrictive. One thing is beating up another player, another one is a flagrant foul or a technical foul to a player complaining too much. Those should be allowed in a videogame.
Yes, I would love to see players like Artest for example have a high "temper" rating. This should lower his overall rating because at anytime he could explode. This would let us see tech. and flagrant fouls in the game (arguing with the ref/pushing a player). Plus it would also only be for certain players.
Thu Dec 09, 2004 2:58 pm
Thu Dec 09, 2004 9:37 pm
Andre wrote:cos the NBA doesn't want a videogame to portrait the "wild" aspect of the league, since it might be a bad example.....
remember when in NHL 98 you could punch with another player till you knocked him down?? you would never see something like that in LIVE.
I think however that the NBA is a way too restrictive. One thing is beating up another player, another one is a flagrant foul or a technical foul to a player complaining too much. Those should be allowed in a videogame.
Sat Dec 11, 2004 2:28 pm
MaD_hAND1e wrote:SAG375 wrote:Andre wrote:cos the NBA doesn't want a videogame to portrait the "wild" aspect of the league, since it might be a bad example.....
remember when in NHL 98 you could punch with another player till you knocked him down?? you would never see something like that in LIVE.
I think however that the NBA is a way too restrictive. One thing is beating up another player, another one is a flagrant foul or a technical foul to a player complaining too much. Those should be allowed in a videogame.
Yes, I would love to see players like Artest for example have a high "temper" rating. This should lower his overall rating because at anytime he could explode. This would let us see tech. and flagrant fouls in the game (arguing with the ref/pushing a player). Plus it would also only be for certain players.
Not to mention jumping in the crowd and beating up fans.... now would you like to have fans be able to throw beers at the players in Live 2006 as well?