I am posting two examples in which I want some input on which one you would consider is the better ranking. Please keep in mind that the general numbers are based on high = 95 average = 75 and low = 50. Anyone who did not attempt 50 3's in the 04-05 season won’t be on the list.
These ratings are based on how many attempts he should have realistically if he played all 48 minutes. Then it compares their attempts to a relationship between the league and generates an expected 3P% based on the number of attempts. Their season 3P% is based on their expected 3P% to get a percentage of how well they achieved their expected goal.
- Code: Select all
jones damon 96
korver kyle 95
richardson quent 95
marshall donyell 95
davis baron 93
crawford jamal 92
allen ray 92
stojakovic peja 92
lewis rashard 90
arenas gilbert 90
mobley cuttino 90
radmanovic vlad 89
stoudamire damon 89
johnson joe 88
atkins chucky 88
miller mike 87
billups chauncey 87
jackson jim 87
gordon ben 87
vanexel nick 87
jackson stephen 86
These ratings are based on how many attempts per game. Then it compares their attempts to a relationship between the league and generates an expected 3P% based on the number of attempts. Their season 3P% is based on their expected 3P% to get a percentage of how well they achieved their expected goal.
- Code: Select all
jones damon 94
richardson quent 94
korver kyle 94
stojakovic peja 92
allen ray 92
johnson joe 92
crawford jamal 91
mobley cuttino 91
arenas gilbert 91
lewis rashard 91
marshall donyell 90
davis baron 90
billups chauncey 88
stoudamire damon 87
atkins chucky 87
miller mike 87
jackson jim 87
radmanovic vlad 86
finley michael 85
vanexel nick 85
jackson stephen 85
Once again I need some input and Ill be happy to post why or why a player is the rating he is. Keep in mind that the highest rating (95-96) can be changed easily to 90 on request