Thu Apr 22, 2004 12:25 pm
Fri Apr 23, 2004 4:39 am
Fri Apr 23, 2004 6:00 am
R-Tistic wrote:Today, I was just doing some tests as far as simulating seasons, and I was nooooot pleased with how the rookies ratings progressed. Many people told me to make player ratings a lot lower, and I understand why, but the ratings improve very very slow. Some of the rookies had A for pkg, and over a six year span, their ratings only imrpoved from 55 to 58. I also experimented and made Iverson, Kobe, Garnett, and Jermaine O'Neal rookies...I also made each of them eight years younger. I made Kobe a 72, Garnett about 74, O'Neal about 63, and Iverson like 70 or so. Kobe got to about 83 in five years with a A PKG...Garnett got to a 80 with a A in five years, O'Neal got to a 64 in five years with an A PKG, and Iverson mysteriously got worst by a few points. So I was not pleased with this, because some players who are a 62 may only end up a 68 or 72 in their prime. Also, I made Lebrons PKG an A, and he went from 69-76 in five years...Melo went from a 63 to a 77 in five years with an A PKG. So I am not gettin how it's supposed to work.
Fri Apr 23, 2004 7:16 am
unicorn wrote:R-Tistic wrote:Today, I was just doing some tests as far as simulating seasons, and I was nooooot pleased with how the rookies ratings progressed. Many people told me to make player ratings a lot lower, and I understand why, but the ratings improve very very slow. Some of the rookies had A for pkg, and over a six year span, their ratings only imrpoved from 55 to 58. I also experimented and made Iverson, Kobe, Garnett, and Jermaine O'Neal rookies...I also made each of them eight years younger. I made Kobe a 72, Garnett about 74, O'Neal about 63, and Iverson like 70 or so. Kobe got to about 83 in five years with a A PKG...Garnett got to a 80 with a A in five years, O'Neal got to a 64 in five years with an A PKG, and Iverson mysteriously got worst by a few points. So I was not pleased with this, because some players who are a 62 may only end up a 68 or 72 in their prime. Also, I made Lebrons PKG an A, and he went from 69-76 in five years...Melo went from a 63 to a 77 in five years with an A PKG. So I am not gettin how it's supposed to work.
Maybe there is a need for them (rookies) to undergo training to improve their ratings? Also, maybe they went or played for a team that they were seldom used so their ratings didn't improved alot?
Fri Apr 23, 2004 12:45 pm
R-Tistic wrote:unicorn wrote:R-Tistic wrote:Today, I was just doing some tests as far as simulating seasons, and I was nooooot pleased with how the rookies ratings progressed. Many people told me to make player ratings a lot lower, and I understand why, but the ratings improve very very slow. Some of the rookies had A for pkg, and over a six year span, their ratings only imrpoved from 55 to 58. I also experimented and made Iverson, Kobe, Garnett, and Jermaine O'Neal rookies...I also made each of them eight years younger. I made Kobe a 72, Garnett about 74, O'Neal about 63, and Iverson like 70 or so. Kobe got to about 83 in five years with a A PKG...Garnett got to a 80 with a A in five years, O'Neal got to a 64 in five years with an A PKG, and Iverson mysteriously got worst by a few points. So I was not pleased with this, because some players who are a 62 may only end up a 68 or 72 in their prime. Also, I made Lebrons PKG an A, and he went from 69-76 in five years...Melo went from a 63 to a 77 in five years with an A PKG. So I am not gettin how it's supposed to work.
Maybe there is a need for them (rookies) to undergo training to improve their ratings? Also, maybe they went or played for a team that they were seldom used so their ratings didn't improved alot?
Does training really help? I always skip it because when I do it, it always makes their ratings lower. Kobe was a started so he was always used. Garnett, Melo, Lebron, and Jermaine started. I think Iverson got pushed to the bench. But true, most of the rookies were either on the bench or free agents, I didn't really mean to have them in the season, I was testing the veterans and current players for an experiment related to Andrew's 95-96 patch.
Fri Apr 23, 2004 12:51 pm
FanOfAll wrote:for every LBJ, there's a DeShawn Steveson...
Fri Apr 23, 2004 1:37 pm
FanOfAll wrote:for one, maybe i'm being stupid, but what's a pkg?
either way, keep in mind lots and lots of rookies don't pan out. let's look at the 2000 draft...
KMart - very good, not superstar though
Swift - finally getting it, took him a long time to develop
Miles - bust until this season in POR where he fit in great...role player his entire career (Will be i mean)
Fizer - buried on the BULLS' bench...
Miller - 2nd option...good player
DeMarr Johnson - auto accidents, doing better
Mihm - bust, lacks intensity, consistency
Crawford - flashes of stardom, and flashes of sucking...
PRzybilla - bust
Dooling - bust so far
Moiso - bust, role player (actually IMO he played very well in his starts for the raptors, but he didn't play much)
Thomas - role player
Alexander - injuries, is a ?
Cleaves - bust, role player
Collier - bust...
I'll stop here...it's just an example that rookies a) take a long time to develop (unless you're some wonder kid, like LBJ or 'Melo) and b) for every LBJ, there's a DeShawn Steveson...
Sat Apr 24, 2004 3:07 am
R-Tistic wrote:Does training really help? I always skip it because when I do it, it always makes their ratings lower.
Sat Apr 24, 2004 5:06 am
Fri Apr 30, 2004 2:04 pm
Mon May 03, 2004 9:43 am
Tue May 04, 2004 8:56 pm
sorry to bump this, but i never got email...could someone who got it or R-Tistic send it to me?
Thu May 06, 2004 8:37 am
Tue May 11, 2004 6:52 am
Tue May 11, 2004 7:13 am
Sun May 30, 2004 7:31 am
Mon May 31, 2004 6:25 am