Sun Sep 04, 2005 12:17 am
Thx. About the elimination, well, it was the 1st season. Wining the ring with Atlanta is too much. It was great that I could just eliminate Boston in first round. About Redd, I had to choose between him and Allen. I prefer good shooters and both are quite good so I chosen Redd despite Allen's higher overall rating cause is a younger player and he can improve.
Sun Sep 04, 2005 12:26 am
That sounds good. Good choice but I personally would've went with Allen.
Sun Sep 04, 2005 12:37 am
Along with his age I chosen Redd cause he wanted less money than Allen, so I have more to expend on other players contracts.
Sun Sep 11, 2005 12:55 am
Take a look on Orlando's roster. Amazing.
Sun Sep 11, 2005 2:54 am
Thats a pretty good roster...amazing in fact
Sun Sep 11, 2005 3:52 am
That's why they have 11-3 in the season, but, where they find cap space to do these moves? BTW, keep it rolling dude, this dynasty is pretty good 
.
.
Sun Sep 11, 2005 4:14 am
Actually they have 17-3 and I'm one of the 3 teams who won them. I don't noticed the roster they have 'til I played against them. I just can't believe when they started to throw to the court their reserves. With such names and outside shooting skills they can thrash any team.
Mon Sep 12, 2005 7:28 am
Oh yeah... I have forget to ask you this, why you have forfeit the picks from both rounds?
Sun Sep 18, 2005 4:38 am
Because rookie are worst players than free agents. Usually rookies are mediocre players, so if I don't get at least a 1st round top ten I prefer to not fill the roster with useless players.
Sun Sep 18, 2005 5:27 am
lol... you're right dude... sometimes when I draft these rookies I edit their ratings (yeah... sometimes I'm a fucking cheater lol)...
Sun Sep 18, 2005 5:33 am
Yea, they are very mediocre. Nearly 50-60 at all atributes but 75 or more in nothing. They got awesome overall ratings but they are just useless. And there are also very little presence of foreign players in virtual drafts. I think You do right editing them if You don't raise too much their overall rating. I supose You edit brazilian players, don't You?
Sun Sep 18, 2005 5:58 am
----- Playoffs ----
Hawks Vs. Heat: 1-3 W(after 2 OT)-L-L-L
The games:
The champs:
Finals MVP:
3 games in a row with poor shooting % Vs. an outstanding transition team = You lose suck**. I hope to have better luck next season.
----- End of 2nd season -----
----- Season 3 -----
Pre-season roster movements:
The roster (team rating 89):
An advice of what is coming on?
Hawks Vs. Heat: 1-3 W(after 2 OT)-L-L-L
The games:
The champs:
Finals MVP:
3 games in a row with poor shooting % Vs. an outstanding transition team = You lose suck**. I hope to have better luck next season.
----- End of 2nd season -----
----- Season 3 -----
Pre-season roster movements:
The roster (team rating 89):
An advice of what is coming on?
Sun Sep 18, 2005 3:44 pm
The true Messiah wrote:Yea, they are very mediocre. Nearly 50-60 at all atributes but 75 or more in nothing. They got awesome overall ratings but they are just useless. And there are also very little presence of foreign players in virtual drafts. I think You do right editing them if You don't raise too much their overall rating. I supose You edit brazilian players, don't You?
Nope... I just edit the rookies (not too much, I just raise his ratings ~3 or 4 points). Nice job resigning Harrington and bringing Wallace to Atlanta. Antonio Davis was a good sign too. Good luck this season.