2004 is really big!!!!

I remembered 2003 was only about 750MB, but 2004 is like 1.5G, that's why the game play is so much better

I don't mean to make fun of you or insult you, but there's no direct relation between size and quality

The arenas, shoes, shirts and everything means more textures, more models, etc. Also there are more animations and stuff, so it's pretty obvious that more content means more size

I don't mean to make fun of you or insult you, but there's no direct relation between size and quality

The arenas, shoes, shirts and everything means more textures, more models, etc. Also there are more animations and stuff, so it's pretty obvious that more content means more size

More content means better game play

I don't mean to make fun of you or insult you, but there's no direct relation between size and quality

The arenas, shoes, shirts and everything means more textures, more models, etc. Also there are more animations and stuff, so it's pretty obvious that more content means more size

More content means better game play

on an off topic yet related note...

not necesarilly, mortal kombat 2, less content than mortal kombat 3...way less.....which is better again?

or a more related note, live 2001 compared to live 2003, content doesnt mean quality, this game seems to have both though

I don't mean to make fun of you or insult you, but there's no direct relation between size and quality

The arenas, shoes, shirts and everything means more textures, more models, etc. Also there are more animations and stuff, so it's pretty obvious that more content means more size

More content means better game play

not necessarily. the coding doesnt take up that much space. so even if they added a ton of commands for the players to do this and that during the game, it wouldn't make the game 2x bigger .

not really true...depends on how good they compress the game...........