Woohoo!

Discussion about NBA Live 2004.

Postby JdotK on Wed Oct 15, 2003 1:56 pm

Old School Fool wrote:I'm pissed off , Intimidated and pissed off.....i fucking hate GameStop its 5:56PM in the Afternoon here in the Bay Area of California and i didn't get the damn game....i want it NOW :x :x


Yep, your right, they fucked up.

I went in at about 11am and the only guy there told me to come back at 1:30.

I went back at 2:30 and a different guy said it isnt in yet... yet behind him was 4 unopened boxes that I know contained the new games they get every Tuesday. I was like "i was just here and the other guy told me to come back now" and he said, yeah try back tomorrow. I fuckin hate when small stores get new coworker that dont know who the regulars are... your suppose to fucking hook me up asshole.
User avatar
JdotK
 
Posts: 50
Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2003 3:33 pm
Location: The Bay - Cali

Postby TMACFOREVER on Thu Oct 16, 2003 6:39 am

Here's some good news, I just saw Chauncey Billups get injured, in game, he was limping off, looked like a hurt knee.
TMACFOREVER
 
Posts: 57
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2003 8:17 am

Postby Lama_PL on Thu Oct 16, 2003 6:52 am

hey TMACFOREVER...could you give me polish players overalls ??

Maciej Lampe (NYKnicks)
Cezary Trybanski (Phoenix Suns)

thx...
Lama_PL
 
Posts: 3
Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2003 7:45 pm
Location: POLAND

Postby TMACFOREVER on Thu Oct 16, 2003 9:46 am

I played another game, 12 minute quarters, All-Star difficulty, Sliders slightly adjusted...

I got beat 102-97

New York shot .419
I shot .404

It was a good game
TMACFOREVER
 
Posts: 57
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2003 8:17 am

Postby TMACFOREVER on Thu Oct 16, 2003 9:49 am

Lampe: 53 overall
Trybanski: 47 overall
TMACFOREVER
 
Posts: 57
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2003 8:17 am

about the ratings..

Postby wisewag on Thu Oct 16, 2003 4:50 pm

it appears low now, so like who has the highest rating and whats the rating? thanks guys! :P
wisewag
 
Posts: 30
Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2003 11:51 am
Location: Philippines

Postby pjrf on Thu Oct 16, 2003 5:52 pm

I was able to put the MJ from the 90's allstars to the Chicago Bulls using the [sign/release player]menu and then play him with the Bulls in the franchise mode in NBA Live 2003. Can you also do this in NBA Live 2004 in the Dynasty mode? Thanks!
pjrf
 
Posts: 4
Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2003 12:45 am

Postby frAn on Thu Oct 16, 2003 6:13 pm

hey! juz wanna ask.. is james jones and carl english on the roster of the pacers there on live2004?
User avatar
frAn
 
Posts: 893
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2003 1:35 pm
Location: Quezon City

Postby Metsis on Thu Oct 16, 2003 7:30 pm

TMACFOREVER wrote:I played another game, 12 minute quarters, All-Star difficulty, Sliders slightly adjusted...

I got beat 102-97

New York shot .419
I shot .404

It was a good game


Now this is looking pretty darn right on the money... Around 100 points and about 40-45% percent shooting. How were the rest of the stats? Any anomalies like too many assists or steals or turnovers for that matter?

It could be that we finally have a good gameplay to produce serious scores.

How is the simulation engine??? This is a good one... Still all bench players scoring 5 ppg etc.
Metsis
 
Posts: 1354
Joined: Thu Nov 14, 2002 6:39 pm
Location: Tampere, Finland

Re: about the ratings..

Postby Wade on Fri Oct 17, 2003 2:29 am

wisewag wrote:it appears low now, so like who has the highest rating and whats the rating? thanks guys! :P

I don't have the game but ı learned from someone else in OS.

Kobe-97,KG-97,T-Mac-92,Duncan-91,Shaq-91,Kidd-89,Pierce-87,Carter&Iverson&Francis-86...

If you want to know some of the superstars I can learn from him...
Wade
 
Posts: 11
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2003 1:38 am
Location: Istanbul/Turkey

Postby TMACFOREVER on Fri Oct 17, 2003 6:36 am

Metsis wrote:
TMACFOREVER wrote:I played another game, 12 minute quarters, All-Star difficulty, Sliders slightly adjusted...

I got beat 102-97

New York shot .419
I shot .404

It was a good game


Now this is looking pretty darn right on the money... Around 100 points and about 40-45% percent shooting. How were the rest of the stats? Any anomalies like too many assists or steals or turnovers for that matter?

It could be that we finally have a good gameplay to produce serious scores.

How is the simulation engine??? This is a good one... Still all bench players scoring 5 ppg etc.


The only bad thing is, to many rebounds on 12 minute quarters...I'm averaging 61.9 rebounds a game right now, but I haven't really done much to rebounding sliders...Also, I don't really simlulate that much, I play every game :wink:
TMACFOREVER
 
Posts: 57
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2003 8:17 am

Postby [Q] on Fri Oct 17, 2003 7:08 am

Well my impression of Live 2004 is that there are too many tips during passes and computer teammates make too many stupid passes. The time between a cut scene and the inbounds pass is too little. NBA store is really cool. (The last Live I had was 2001 so I'm happy). The throwbacks and shoes are cool. The PS2 version is almost perfect, but no way for us patchers to get to it (especially with the Bobcats). They tease us with the Bobcats, only available for exhibition mode and with people like C. Center etc. I also like the cutscenes during dynasty. Other than that, I'm just waiting for the PC version so I can trade the PS2 game back to EB Games for $25 towards the PC version. :x EA owes me $25!
The gameplay is great and I'm already a big fan of the pro hop! (GP owns everyone with this.)
Oh and there's too many passes where players jump and turn to pass.
Hard to advance the ball up the court too...
Image
User avatar
[Q]
NBA Live 18 Advocate
NLSC Team Member
 
Posts: 14396
Joined: Tue Oct 01, 2002 8:20 am
Location: Westside, the best side

Postby chipper on Fri Oct 17, 2003 7:14 am

TMACFOREVER wrote:
Metsis wrote:
TMACFOREVER wrote:I played another game, 12 minute quarters, All-Star difficulty, Sliders slightly adjusted...

I got beat 102-97

New York shot .419
I shot .404

It was a good game


Now this is looking pretty darn right on the money... Around 100 points and about 40-45% percent shooting. How were the rest of the stats? Any anomalies like too many assists or steals or turnovers for that matter?

It could be that we finally have a good gameplay to produce serious scores.

How is the simulation engine??? This is a good one... Still all bench players scoring 5 ppg etc.


The only bad thing is, to many rebounds on 12 minute quarters...I'm averaging 61.9 rebounds a game right now, but I haven't really done much to rebounding sliders...Also, I don't really simlulate that much, I play every game :wink:


FG% and total points are the most important things i guess.
I mean, other stats... we have to look at the averages not one game.
There will be nights when there's lots of blocks but sometimes very few. Depends on which teams are playing and so on.. you know what i mean.

Also, I won't be too much concerned about rebounding numbers as much as steals and blocks. As long as scores are realistic and FG% are realistic, i think rebounding numbers should be fairly realistic as well

Just my thoughts though
chipper
 
Posts: 413
Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2002 10:22 am
Location: California

Previous

Return to NBA Live 2004

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest