???
5 posts
• Page 1 of 1
???
by weed manus on Sun Feb 08, 2004 1:14 pm
???
Last edited by weed manus on Wed Feb 11, 2004 7:11 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
weed manus - Posts: 109
- Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2004 2:37 am
by MaD_hAND1e on Tue Feb 10, 2004 7:29 pm
hmm.. 
wht shooting slider settings would u set with this rating system? cos with ben's sliders, someone with 75-80 would make around 45% - 50% 2pt fgs
wht shooting slider settings would u set with this rating system? cos with ben's sliders, someone with 75-80 would make around 45% - 50% 2pt fgs-
MaD_hAND1e - Posts: 1271
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2002 5:09 pm
by oboeguy on Wed Feb 11, 2004 6:43 am
Let's consider some of the higher rated non-big men. Cassel is at .496. So, by your system:
496 * 2 - 50 = 992 - 50 = 942
Don't tell me Cassel is not a "star player", as he averages over 20ppg, so his FG rating by your system is in fact 94.
Sorry I don't buy it. You've based your claim on imagined accuracy for one player, so I feel fine in killing it with one player. Really, though, how did you come up with your system?
496 * 2 - 50 = 992 - 50 = 942
Don't tell me Cassel is not a "star player", as he averages over 20ppg, so his FG rating by your system is in fact 94.
Sorry I don't buy it. You've based your claim on imagined accuracy for one player, so I feel fine in killing it with one player. Really, though, how did you come up with your system?
-
oboeguy - Posts: 355
- Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2002 12:51 am
- Location: NYC
5 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests