Patr1ck wrote:They should have just started the LeBron era a few years earlier, like 08-09. Even though he lost in the conference finals, it was his first MVP season. Then they could have started the Steph era at 2014.
Andrew wrote:Yes, there are still several players who haven't been licensed and thus are absent.
debiler wrote:Andrew wrote:Yes, there are still several players who haven't been licensed and thus are absent.
Aw man, I hate that. At 2K, they have all the tools to easily give us full rosters and complete draft classes. I'm not even talking about full on cyberfaces, just stats and accurate player data. But we have to bend over backwards to use external tools - which won't be available for quite some time - to painstakingly create authentic rosters year in, year out. Makes me mad.
Andrew wrote:debiler wrote:Andrew wrote:Yes, there are still several players who haven't been licensed and thus are absent.
Aw man, I hate that. At 2K, they have all the tools to easily give us full rosters and complete draft classes. I'm not even talking about full on cyberfaces, just stats and accurate player data. But we have to bend over backwards to use external tools - which won't be available for quite some time - to painstakingly create authentic rosters year in, year out. Makes me mad.
When it comes to licensing all the former players, some of it's on 2K, some of it's on difficult circumstances. Obviously, it seems like they could indeed get Charles Barkley if they just met his request to make a donation to the NBRPA. It's the least they could do, considering how much money they make off of historical content. Similar deal with Reggie Miller and Rasheed Wallace. Sheed has been pretty blunt about it actually, stating they need to CTC; cut the cheque!
On the other hand, with thousands of players throughout the decades, there are challenges in licensing them all if they haven't joined any group agreement. Some of them are difficult to track down, or not interested, or they've passed away and their families aren't interested, or they're asking for too much money for someone who was the 11th man on a roster in 1984. Of course, if they're lowballing big names, chances are there have been some insulting offers to role players and journeymen, too.
I'm also guessing there are difficulties with players who have recently left the league but are either eying a return, or remain active overseas. So yeah, it's a shame and some of it comes down to Take-Two, but they're also in a tough spot if players can't be reached or refuse to sign on. Making the placeholders basically the missing players in all but name would be helpful, but given the lawsuits that have come about due to obvious stand-ins in previous games, it'd be risky, so I understand why they're careful there.
KyotoCarl wrote:Been simming a few years with the Bulls in the Jordan era and noticed some errors:
-Bulls move to the United Center before the 92-93 season, which is wrong. They moved there in '94.
-Commentary says they've won two championships in a row. At this point they had only won one.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest