TGsoGood wrote:Does anyone know if paypal allows donations of less than $1?
Pep wrote:Andrew, I think two weeks between early access and free release should be a maximum time. It would be optimal amount of time for buyers to enjoy a mod before others and short time to wait for rest of players.
bluejaybrandon wrote:TGsoGood wrote:Does anyone know if paypal allows donations of less than $1?
They do. I’ve sent donations as low as 5 cents just to test that an account is working.
bigh0rt wrote:I have concerns about the early access possibilities with respect to people wanting us to potentially police people who pay for early access and then share the mod with whomever they wish. I see scenarios with replies of "PM me", when a user replies saying they can't afford the early access but want the mod (which we see with regularity regarding the purchase of the game itself, so I don't see it as a big stretch); and those posts being reported, and becoming a tremendous headache.
I also wonder if modders getting the short end of the stick in the above scenario would want the Team Members to turn a blind eye to that rule violation as they do with others... Cherry picking is always a good time.
Andrew wrote:I'm glad this has been brought up. Ad links are becoming an issue, and it's getting to the point where we're going to have to seriously re-evaluate our policies and rules. Obviously that's a drastic measure and it's something that has to be approached fairly - we wouldn't retroactively make it a violation and there'd be a grace period, for example - but it is getting to that point.
There are two main issues at hand here: the dangers presented by specific ad link services themselves, and the overall culture and mentality. I'll address the former first, because it's arguably the more pressing issue, and the easier fix.
Some ad links services, like adf.ly, aren't as safe as they once were. They want to install malware, or otherwise compromise the security and performance of your browser and PC. We shouldn't be putting each other at risk like that. Similarly, a lot of the ads are for adult content. It's not appropriate for us to be linking to that kind of content, even in unintended ad form. We have minors in the community, we're trying to keep things PG, and frankly we don't want to put our hosting and advertising at risk through any kind of links or connections to adult content. When it comes to the viruses/malware and adult content, I don't want links involving those things in our Downloads section, or even just posted in topics in the Forum.
Now, one solution here is to identify problematic ad link providers, prohibit their use, and allow the use of specific approved services that are safe. The problem is that they don't necessarily stay safe for long, and there's also the second problem of the culture and mentality in the modding community these days.
If money is your main motivation for modding, you're modding for the wrong reasons. It's not what our community was built upon, and it's led to a lot of greedy and unfair practices. It's not right to make people have to click through multiple ad links to get to the download, even if they're safe. You should be modding because you enjoy the hobby and enhancing your own gaming experience, and want to share that work with others. Given that there are means of making some spare change (which can add up in some cases), a tip jar/donation link is fine and understandable, and you'll find that if you're doing great work and treating people well, your audience will be appreciate and generous. Also, while there are cases of people making a decent amount of money through ad links, for most people they aren't profitable. It's like YouTube: some people will blow up and make a lot of money, for others it'll always be a hobby that makes them some spare change on the side at best.
There are some disturbing trends in the modding community right now. The overuse of ad links and push to make the hobby all about making money. Holding back releases until you get a certain number of Likes, video views, or comments. Petty sniping back and forth, and unnecessary drama. It's an insult to all the modders who helped establish this community and make it what it is today, as well as the people who are currently trying to maintain the site.
To that end, sticky-fingers has raised a couple of rather pertinent issues.sticky-fingers wrote:I'm curious to know if modders using donations and adfly also used to support NLSC with donation/tip
Some people have indeed paid it forward with some generous donations and support here and there when they can afford it, and I'm very grateful for that. However, by and large, the people using ad links aren't donating anything to our hosting fund. All of the services provided here on the NLSC are free, but our hosting is not. It's a tad hypocritical to happily use a free service and platform, while also claiming that you should be compensated for your work, as though you're the only person putting in the hard yards in our community (then or now).
Yes, mods can take a lot of time and effort to create - even if I'm not as involved in that side of things these days, I've been making updates since 1997 so I'm well aware and appreciative of that - and it's nice to receive some appreciation for that in the form of monetary compensation. You know what else requires a lot of time and effort though, as well as money to maintain? The NLSC itself. And even if you want to say "well, I'll just use Facebook instead", you'd still be insisting on using a platform that's completely free, while demanding money of other people. Facebook also has a lot more money than I do, I can assure you. If you're benefiting from the use of a platform that comes with an audience, resources, and a knowledge base that are freely available, while also saying that you should be compensated for your time without having any interest in paying it forward to that platform or even other modders, that's disingenuous and hypocritical.
I'm not saying that everyone must donate, because that would be unfair given everyone's individual financial situations, and my goal is to provide the NLSC's facilities free of charge as long as it's financially viable for me to keep the site up and running. However, it does take a lot of time and effort on my part, just as modding does, and I'm doing it for free. Just keep that in mind when we're talking about what's fair as far as being compensated on a free platform. For that matter, simply supporting the NLSC by sharing our articles and original content on social media, talking about them in the Forum and having a conversation about the topic in the comments section, and simply being involved in more than just releasing your own mods, goes a long way in supporting the site.
Speaking of efforts to maintain things around here...sticky-fingers wrote:another issue is the availability of the mods.
after few months, they disappear for ever for mediafire and co...
So you want recognition of your work, but you dont care about that.
This is becoming more of a problem. One of the reasons that we're hosted on a dedicated server is so that we can help out with permanent (and again, free) file hosting, though I understand why people may prefer to use other services and add external links. That's fine, we're set up for that as well. Since the use of adf.ly took off however, we've had more and more broken links in the Downloads section, which isn't a good look. Frankly I'm fed up trying to track them down or bug people to fix their links, so if I get a report about a broken link and it's not easily fixed, I've decided I'm just going to remove it. I've already got enough on my plate without having to chase that up as well, and so often ad links are involved when links go down.
I could go on and on about the culture and mentality, but I'd be repeating what I've already laid out in a couple of articles I wrote for Monday Tip-Off:
Why We Don’t Charge For Mods
Are You Modding For The Right Reasons?
So, where does that all leave us?
We're going to have to work out a few things as a community, but as far as the problematic practices are concerned, it is getting to the point where rules are going to have to be changed. If we don't outright ban ad links, the rules are at least going to have to change as far as a safe service that can be used. Things like running people through multiple ad links, or holding back releases until a set goal of donations, Likes, views, or replies, are going to be outlawed if they continue because that's just plain toxic. With Patreon being a thing, we have to decide what's fair as far as early access releases and so forth, because otherwise it just becomes creatively charging for mods and we're not going to allow that here (or for that matter, Patreon exclusive releases to be promoted here).
As this important conversation continues, I would urge people to consider using donation links/tip jars instead of ad links. You'll find that people are quite generous, and for most people, it'll be a higher earning than they'll make with all the ad link clicks, without putting the community through the hassle. As others have noted, the use of ad links has also actively discouraged people from downloading mods, which means you don't get the traffic and the revenue anyway. And of course, it's a shame when downloads go missing because the focus has been on an ad link rather than making sure they're permanently available.
Anyway, this is something we need to continue discussing because it is a problem, and it's forcing us to consider far more serious rules regarding modding practices. I'll probably end up making this a global topic at some point so that it continues to get attention as we work this out, and the whole modding community can see it.
maumau78 wrote:https://forums.nba-live.com/viewtopic.php?f=153&t=94047&start=12125#p1990231
Just an info: has this been approved by someone?
I personally approve HAWK23 work and I'm not against Patreon...just wondering If It's backed by admins or not....
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests