by benji on Fri Oct 10, 2003 2:06 pm
I don't want to bring your unfounded war of hatred against me onto here (for I challenged your lies), but I'll address a few things and number them for you.
1. I never said Arnold was a good choice, ANYWHERE. What I said about Arnold is he is the only Republican who could win, which was true, if Arnold had not entered the race, McClintock would not have been able to win. Arnold generated excitement in the Recall and then McClintock's debate performance tripled his final vote tally.
2. I did read a few things about what Arnold's policy ideas were along with the other four of the Big Five canidates, but they aren't really relevant to me because I don't live in California.
3. You can claim I'm "so right wing" if you want to, because compared to you I am "so right wing." The fact is, I realize that George W. Bush is better than the other potential options available. I have never stated he was perfect and infact listed for you very blatantly his major flaws. The fact that I defended his foreign policy decisions (which I agree with about 2/3rds of) against your complete lies in a thread in which you wanted just that or that I think Bush is better than the other potential options (which we listed out in that thread) does not make me a Reactionary.
I told you, if you wanted to discuss this with a touch of maturity, there are already threads you started in which this discussion can perpetuate. But, all you do is insult people and make other disparaging comments and then whine about how you were just joking when you face consequences. Don't start a discussion, then when people come at you with actual discussion points, drop to insults, then when told not to, back out and go around the forum being a jackass.
I apologize to everyone on here, I should've deleted the post someone made telling this guy to "not goto the NLSC."
Also, aloyisious...if I'm so right wing, why would I ever think Arnold was a good choice...
Last edited by
benji on Fri Oct 10, 2003 2:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.