benji wrote:Did you even read it? They hacked ImageShack.
If others are wondering:
benji wrote:It says. They don't want security exploits to be shared and sold.
Probably should edit out the big image from your quote.
DahLollipop wrote:I wanted to know more info other than what was on that image
Jae wrote:Calm the fuck down you fucking lunatic I can't fucking understand why fucking people get so fucking mad at other fucking people responding to them on a fucking internet message fucking board.
benji wrote:DahLollipop wrote:I wanted to know more info other than what was on that image
There's not much more to know.
Modifly wrote:let me google that for you.com .. I've never seen this site before. It's perfect for annoying people that cant simply google things up.
benji wrote:Look, these guys (this guy?) came out of nowhere. The "Anti-Sec Movement" didn't exist as of a week ago on anywhere official. I was Googling this as soon as it came up twelve hours ago, nobody had heard of it, the image was the best source of any info.
Best simple explanation of the stated motives I've seen is, the guy/group whatever is...
FOR: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Security_through_obscurity
AGAINST: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parable_of ... ken_window
Most IT and such people are assuming it was a one-time flaw found in Imageshack that's being exploited for an ideological argument by a person/group that may not have further ability.
I wasn't being a smartass, there was literally no info beyond the image. We might know more in 24 hours or so depending on what Imageshack knows or reveals.
benji wrote:It's alright, I didn't have much more, everyone everywhere was pointing to the image as it was the only source. That's still the best source, you have to read it specifically to pick out the argument. It's not a practical "I'm doing this, to do accomplish this!" It's an argument about a specific security philosophy and a threat to promote further change. (That it must be said, no one will take seriously until further events happen.)
If I took internet insults personally, I would've slit my wrists by now.
Because some people still have some dignity to have at least some self-respect for themselves? I don't know about you but when someone talks to me with that sort of smartass attitude, I'd definitely be pissed.
DahLollipop wrote:Modifly wrote:let me google that for you.com .. I've never seen this site before. It's perfect for annoying people that cant simply google things up.
And what is that supposed to mean? I'm extremely tired and pestered by my internet which can't seem to stabilize itself or boost its own damn speed.. So maybe you should clarify yourself before I judge you as a friend..
Jae wrote:Because some people still have some dignity to have at least some self-respect for themselves? I don't know about you but when someone talks to me with that sort of smartass attitude, I'd definitely be pissed.
Internet dignity is definitely misplaced. There's rules here, about everything, including the way you talk to other posters. Your reaction wasn't proportionate to the initial comment.
I read what you said about your internet etc but that aside the above still stands.
Modifly wrote:DahLollipop wrote:Modifly wrote:let me google that for you.com .. I've never seen this site before. It's perfect for annoying people that cant simply google things up.
And what is that supposed to mean? I'm extremely tired and pestered by my internet which can't seem to stabilize itself or boost its own damn speed.. So maybe you should clarify yourself before I judge you as a friend..
You dont have to judge me as a friend if you dont want to.
I'm sorry about your internet, I've had the same problem before and it was a pain in the ass but as far as I recall I didn't went mad on other people because my internet was busted. I'm not going to clarify anything because they was nothing to clarify, it was supposed to mean the way you want it to. If you looked at it positively like other people would then it would be a joke, but if you looked at it rather negatively then this is what will happen. If I'm not mistaken, I didn't mention anything concerning you at all, you went ahead and decided for yourself that it concerned you. I was just honestly saying that I've never seen the site before, and that it is perfect "For all those people that find it more convenient to bother you with their question rather than google it for themselves." Did you fall in that category? I didn't say so, I never said so, so dont get alarmed. I even posted a link to Rasheed Wallace's new look in your cyberface thread followed bywhen you asked for one using that site (lmgtfy.com) so it's pretty obvious what my intentions was : nothing, but if any, a simple joke. Take a joke and call it a day, dont make a big deal out of nothing like LeBron did when he got dunked on. All my friends should have some sense of humour in them anyway.
Dont get your anger all mixed up, and like I've said, you dont have to judge me as a friend if you dont want to. I certainly have no problem with that.Maybe you should have judged yourself before you made that post. Anyway, if those words that I wrote without any intentions offended you, then I apologize.
Its_asdf wrote:..So much..... Internet rage....
Modifly wrote:Dont worry, no harms done.
shadowgrin wrote:I like it how some people become angry and then offer silly excuses on why they are angry.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests