j.23's wikipedia article of the day:

Other video games, TV shows, movies, general chit-chat...this is an all-purpose off-topic board where you can talk about anything that doesn't have its own dedicated section.

j.23's wikipedia article of the day:

Postby j.23 on Mon Jul 31, 2006 8:54 am

i'll try to make this a daily thing -- without further ado, i present to you the kitty genovese case:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kitty_Genovese

Life

Born in New York City, Genovese was the oldest of five children in a middle class Italian American family and was raised in Brooklyn. After her mother witnessed a murder in the city, the family chose to move to Connecticut in 1954. Genovese, however, 19 at the time, chose to remain in the city, where she lived for ten years. Kitty eventually took a job as a bar manager at Ev's 11th Hour Sports bar on Jamaica Avenue in Hollis, Queens. At the time of her murder, she lived in a Queens apartment she shared with her girlfriend, Mary Ann Zielonko. The two lived a quiet life together.
[edit]

Attack

Genovese had driven home in the early morning of March 13, 1964. Arriving home at about 3:15 a.m. and parking about 100 feet (30 m) from her apartment's door, she was approached by a man named Winston Moseley. Moseley ran after her and quickly overtook her, stabbing her twice in the back. When Genovese screamed out, her cries were heard by several neighbors; but on a cold night with the windows closed only a few of them recognized the sound as a cry for help. When one of the neighbors shouted at the attacker, "Let that girl alone!", Moseley ran away and Genovese slowly made her way towards her own apartment around the end of the building. She was seriously injured but now out of view of those few who may have had reason to believe she was in need of help.

Records of the earliest calls to police are unclear and were certainly not given a high priority by the police. One witness said his father called police after the initial attack and reported that a woman was "beat up, but got up and was staggering around."

Other witnesses observed Moseley enter his car and drive away, only to return ten minutes later. He systematically searched the parking lot, train station, and small apartment complex, ultimately finding Genovese, who was lying, barely conscious, in a hallway at the back of the building. Out of view of the street and of those who may have heard or seen any sign of the original attack, he proceeded to further attack her, stabbing her several more times. Knife wounds in her hands suggested that she attempted to defend herself from him. While she lay dying he attempted to rape her. He stole about $49.00 from her and left her dying in the hallway. The attacks spanned approximately half an hour.

A few minutes after the final attack a witness, Karl Ross, called the police. Police and medical personnel arrived within minutes of Ross's call; Genovese was taken away by ambulance and died en route to the hospital. Later investigation revealed that 38 individuals nearby had heard or observed portions of the attack, though none could have seen or been aware of the entire incident. Only one witness (Joseph Fink) was aware she was stabbed in the first attack, and only Karl Ross was aware of it in the second attack. Many were entirely unaware that an assault or homicide was in progress; some thought that what they saw or heard was a lover's quarrel or a drunken brawl or a group of friends leaving the bar outside which Moseley first approached Genovese.
[edit]

Perpetrator

Winston Moseley, a business machine operator, was later apprehended in connection with another crime; he confessed not only to the murder of Kitty Genovese, but to two other murders as well, both involving sexual assaults. Subsequent psychiatric examinations suggested that Moseley was a necrophiliac. He was convicted of murder and sentenced to death.

Moseley gave a confession to the police where he detailed the attack, corroborating the physical evidence at the scene. His motive for the attack was simply "to kill a woman." Moseley stated that he got up that night around 2:00 a.m., leaving his wife asleep at home, and drove around to find a victim. He spied Genovese and followed her to the parking lot.

Moseley also testified at his own trial where he further described the attack, leaving no question that he was the killer.

This sentence was reduced to an indeterminate sentence of 20 years to life imprisonment on June 1, 1967. The New York Court of Appeals found that Moseley should have been able to argue that he was medically insane at the sentencing hearing when the trial court found that he had been legally sane.

In 1968, during a trip to a Buffalo, New York hospital for surgery, Moseley overpowered a guard and beat him up to the point that his eyes were bloody. He then took a bat and swung it at the closest person to him and took five hostages, sexually assaulting one of them, before he was recaptured alive. He remained in prison after being denied parole a twelfth time on February 3, 2006. A previous parole hearing included his defense that "For a victim outside, it's a one-time or one-hour or one-minute affair, but for the person who's caught, it's forever."[1] He will be eligible for parole again in 2008.
[edit]

Public reaction

The story of Genovese's murder became an almost-instant parable about the supposed callousness, or at least apathy to others' plight, of either New York City, urban America, or humanity in general. Much of this framing of the event came in reaction to an investigative article [2] in the New York Times written by Martin Gansberg and published on March 27, two weeks after the murder. The article bore the thrilling headline "Thirty-Eight Who Saw Murder Didn't Call the Police"; the public view of the story crystallized around a quote from the article, from an unidentified neighbor who saw part of the attack but deliberated, before finally getting another neighbor to call the police: "I didn't want to get involved".

While Genovese's neighbors were vilified by the article, in truth "38 onlookers who did nothing" is a misleading conception. The article begins:

For more than half an hour thirty-eight respectable, law-abiding citizens in Queens watched a killer stalk and stab a woman in three separate attacks in Kew Gardens.

This lead is dramatic and factually inaccurate. None of the witnesses observed the attacks in their entirety. Because of the layout of the complex and the fact that each attack took place in a different location as Genovese attempted to flee her attacker, it would have been physically impossible for a witness to have seen the entire attack. Most only heard portions of the incident without realizing its seriousness, a few saw only small portions of the initial assault, and no witnesses directly saw the final rape and attack in an exterior hallway which resulted in Genovese's death.

Nevertheless, media attention to the Genovese murder led to reform of the NYPD's telephone reporting system; the system in place at the murder was often inefficient and directed individuals to the incorrect department. The melodramatic press coverage also led to serious investigation of the bystander effect by academic psychologists. In addition, some communities organized Neighborhood Watch programs and the equivalent for apartment buildings to aid people in distress.

To this day the story of Kitty Genovese remains a rallying point for advocates of self-defense awareness.
User avatar
j.23
 
Posts: 2894
Joined: Mon May 26, 2003 6:09 pm
Location: nuts in your face

Postby Its_asdf on Mon Jul 31, 2006 9:21 am

Didn't we have a few of these before and then they failed because no one gave a crap anymore?
User avatar
Its_asdf
I'm kind of a big deal.
 
Posts: 5462
Joined: Sat Mar 19, 2005 4:53 am
Location: Under a Rock in Canada

Postby The Other Kevin on Mon Jul 31, 2006 9:47 am

That's because Dweaver was doing it.
Image

Cloudy wrote:Damn I thought AO the streetballer got killed and is in Hell..
User avatar
The Other Kevin
 
Posts: 1733
Joined: Thu May 12, 2005 7:30 am
Location: New York

Postby J@3 on Mon Jul 31, 2006 3:30 pm

Yeah, he kept doing boring shit no one cared about. This was actually quite interesting though.
User avatar
J@3
 
Posts: 19815
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 3:25 pm
Location: MLB

Postby j.23 on Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:02 pm

i thought this one was pretty funny. internet kiddies trying too hard to get e-fame.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brandon_Vedas

Brandon Carl Vedas (April 21, 1981 – January 12, 2003), known as ripper on IRC, was a member of the Shroomery.org community who died of an overdose from prescription medication and recreational drugs while chatting on an IRC channel and uploading live video of the incident via webcam. His death led to considerable debate about the responsibilities and roles of online communities in life-threatening situations.
[edit]

Overview

The chat/webcam session apparently began by Vedas smoking cannabis in preparation, and then logging into the #shroomery IRC channel. Upon entering the channel he announced “I've got a grip of drugs” and indicated that his webcam was up, and that chatters were welcome to view his “grip of drugs” and his subsequent ingestion of them. While some of the substances were illicit drugs (e.g. cannabis), most of them had apparently been obtained through legitimate prescriptions for treatment of various illnesses that Vedas was said to have suffered.

Even in the early stages of the chat, Vedas was particularly quiet as he was likely preoccupied with his actions being captured by the webcam. He began by consuming Psilocybe Mushrooms which had been stored in a prescription medication bottle. As the chat session progressed, one of the users in the channel, grphish, noted “that's a lot of klonopin” and this is thought to be when Vedas consumed 8mg of clonazepam (Klonopin). Vedas continued by showing the webcam viewers what would be one of four bottles of methadone that he would consume over the course of the session, and, after noting this on the channel, proceeded to consume an entire bottle (reportedly 80mg of methadone). After a brief respite, Vedas then consumed 80mg of methylphenidate (Ritalin), 110 mg of propranolol (Inderal), two Vicodin tablets, and 120mg temazepam (Restoril), which seem to have been taken in-between descriptions given on the IRC channel.

During this process, Vedas maintained that this was “usual weekend behaviour” for him and that he had consumed similar quantities of the same substances on previous occasions. The quote “i told u i was hardcore” was one of the last things Brandon ever said, and is often used on internet message boards and discussion sites to refer to this incident.

Upon consuming the remainder of the original batch of drugs from the beginning of the webcam session, Vedas began to retrieve and prepare to consume even more drugs that he had stashed throughout the room. It was at this point that the users of the channel began to voice their concerns that Vedas was taking things too far. Some pleaded with him to stop while others recommended that he seek immediate medical attention. After taking another large quantity of the same drugs he had already ingested, Vedas gave instructions that if anything were to go wrong, that they should call try to contact him by calling his cell phone, and if that didn't work, they should call the local authorities and give them the license plate number of his car, which was parked in his driveway and could easily be seen from the street.

When Vedas lost consciousness, users of the chatroom considered informing the police and asking that they trace Vedas's cellphone in order to locate him. However, the members of the channel were hesitant to contact the authorities for fear of involving Vedas and/or themselves in a police investigation.

During the chat, one user says they began to call the police, but talked their way out of the phone call after other users told them to hang up, claiming that the police told them that there was no way to find Vedas with the information available. However, according to Vedas's brother, who maintains the site Brandon Vedas, the information Brandon gave to the users in the chat, as well as the address in his domain name registration would have been enough for the police to locate Brandon, which he confirmed with local police. Later, Vedas's brother said about the incident, “It seems like the group mentality really contributed to it. These people treat it like somehow it's not the real world. They forget it's not just words on a screen.”

His mother discovered the body in the afternoon of January 12, 2003.
User avatar
j.23
 
Posts: 2894
Joined: Mon May 26, 2003 6:09 pm
Location: nuts in your face

Postby Nick on Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:10 pm

That was interesting too. "i told u i was hardcore"
User avatar
Nick
Barnsketball
Contributor
 
Posts: 6536
Joined: Sun Sep 15, 2002 9:01 pm
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Postby Null17 on Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:41 pm

That kid was a dumbass
Null17
 
Posts: 4543
Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2004 6:55 pm
Location: Philippines

Postby J@3 on Tue Aug 01, 2006 5:10 pm

I read about that ages ago, there's actually various chat transcripts around of the night he died. I saw a documentary about it too, they interviewed some guy who was supposedly one of his friends. Just your fat, Star Wars loving (he was wearing a Star Wars shirt) friendly neighbourhood internet nerd.
User avatar
J@3
 
Posts: 19815
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 3:25 pm
Location: MLB


Return to Off-Topic

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests