Other video games, TV shows, movies, general chit-chat...this is an all-purpose off-topic board where you can talk about anything that doesn't have its own dedicated section.
Mon May 08, 2006 11:52 pm
Work on the text. It get lost in the confusion cuz of the color.
Sun Jun 04, 2006 2:15 pm
here is my first sig in a while, please post sugestions
Last edited by
3P on Sat Jun 10, 2006 9:00 am, edited 1 time in total.
Sun Jun 04, 2006 2:24 pm
Yeah the sig is OKAY! the text is okay, the render still needs to be cut more, the
BG is ehh, its just an desent sig, but its ya first try so its great, its good to
see new people joing the gfx world =) hope to see ya elevate.
.
To elevate go to gfx sites like http://www.chaosgfx.com
.
Payce:::....
Sun Jun 04, 2006 2:29 pm
Above The Intellectual:::....
Well I'm convinced.
Sun Jun 04, 2006 9:39 pm
Jae wrote:Above The Intellectual:::....
Well I'm convinced.
what is that suposed to mean?
i made another sig, please post more suggestions and critism
Last edited by
3P on Sat Jun 10, 2006 9:01 am, edited 1 time in total.
Mon Jun 05, 2006 4:33 am
here's another, please post suggestions
Last edited by
3P on Sat Jun 10, 2006 9:01 am, edited 3 times in total.
Mon Jun 05, 2006 4:40 am
the okafor sig seemed best. All the others are terrible Are you making them with paint?

sorry
Mon Jun 05, 2006 4:43 am
what are you talking about? i don't have an okafor sig
Mon Jun 05, 2006 4:44 am
CP3 wrote:what are you talking about? i don't have an okafor sig

my bad
Mon Jun 05, 2006 4:49 am
i think you meant to post in wankster's thread
Mon Jun 05, 2006 4:57 am
CP3 wrote:i think you meant to post in wankster's thread
no i just saw his topic before yours and made little mistake
Mon Jun 05, 2006 6:03 am
CP3 wrote:

any comments about those?
Last edited by
3P on Sat Jun 10, 2006 9:01 am, edited 1 time in total.
Mon Jun 05, 2006 7:44 am
Get rid of that stuff in the backround for Amare. Its makin my eyes hurt.
Mon Jun 05, 2006 7:58 am
it is better that way, this is how it is without the stuff
Last edited by
3P on Sat Jun 10, 2006 9:01 am, edited 1 time in total.
Mon Jun 05, 2006 8:01 am
I think he meant get rid of the ugly stuff that you kept in it.
Mon Jun 05, 2006 8:27 am
here are six versions like that
also what do you guys think about the shaq one
Last edited by
3P on Sat Jun 10, 2006 9:01 am, edited 1 time in total.
Mon Jun 05, 2006 8:45 am
Your sigs are too busy IMO. There needs to be one main focus of the sig, not three. You can do that by fading stuff into the backround, or by using contrast.
Mon Jun 05, 2006 8:50 am
how is this
also what about the Shaq sig
Last edited by
3P on Sat Jun 10, 2006 9:02 am, edited 1 time in total.
Mon Jun 05, 2006 8:56 am
It's a lot better. Now, I'd say get rid of the stroke (never stroke a player, it always looks bad) and angle the pic so it's a bit more vertical. The text needs work too, I like to anchor my text against something (see how in my sig it's stuck in the corner?). The Shaq sig is pretty much like this one; there's no real focus in it, the text is even worse, and you need to add layer effects on the players.
Mon Jun 05, 2006 9:56 am
i will try the suggestions in my next sig
Mon Jun 05, 2006 11:00 am
here is my newest sig
please post more suggestions
Tue Jun 06, 2006 9:00 am
here is a new one
Tue Jun 06, 2006 10:56 am
I think you need to ditch the patterns and use some brushes.
Tue Jun 06, 2006 1:19 pm
i did that, hope you like it
keep the critism up

it has really improved my sigs
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.
phpBB Mobile / SEO by Artodia.