Weapons In Space

[Mazzocchi]

I dont get all the controversy surrounding weapons in space and the starwars program. From what I gather it would mostly used as an anti missle shield for north america, but it cant be done because our government opposes it.

http://www.mytelus.com/news/article.do? ... ID=1853125

yes this is great! then the United States will controll most of the defences on earth! And all of the defences in space! this is going ot be great!
[/sarcasim]
so what do you think of it?

[COOLmac©]

i think they already have some folks in a covert intelligence agency. of course its covert so not much infomation there. but a couple of wierd guys long ago has already mailed me about this so called C.I.O. (covert intelligence organization) which fosters anti alien defences here on earth and space. of course i'm betting you guys think this is a hoax. i thought so too.imagine real life MEN IN BLACKS. but oh hell....if the earth will be defended i'm sure glad that a super power america do it. atleast they use the universal language "ENGLISH"

[cyanide]

The link doesn't work right now.

As for the idea, I wouldn't trust any nation to control most of the earth's defenses. If it has to be done, then collectively, but not a single nation.

[COOLmac©]

3rd world countries can't contribute much you know cyanide...they have more problems in their own soil than to think of earths safety

[Fresh8]

Bush and tyhe US Government... we're only building a 'defence' system...

Its all bull! They taking over the world...

[Jowe]

The US government probably has a stock pile of nuclear weapons as 'defence' .

[Fresh8]

bush will be like, 'oh, we need to defend ourselves against korea and iran... lets send this nuke over there as 'defence' '

[cyanide]

3rd world countries can't contribute much you know cyanide...they have more problems in their own soil than to think of earths safety

lol, I wasn't talking about third world nations. The US isn't the only powerful nation in the world, you know. There's the European Union, China and Japan, and even Canada.

[COOLmac©]

i'm not quiet sure yet. but if the entire world gang up against the US im sure they will pretty hang in there.....

[The GOAT]

COOLmac: Click.

[Username123]

Drug Rehabs..... Anyway I think Its time for a country to attack America cause they have weapons of mass destruction. If America thought rocks were weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, then i think America has lots more than just rocks as thier defence.

They have lots of weapons that can wipe out an entire country and stuff, dont people consider that as weapons of mass destruction??

[cyanide]

Drug Rehabs..... Anyway I think Its time for a country to attack America cause they have weapons of mass destruction. If America thought rocks were weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, then i think America has lots more than just rocks as thier defence.

They have lots of weapons that can wipe out an entire country and stuff, dont people consider that as weapons of mass destruction??

Yes, but America supposedly is using those WMD's to prevent "evil" and "terrorists" from attacking. America supposedly would not use those WMDs on their own people or against a country that does not harbor "terrorists" and "evil"

[Mazzocchi]

i fixed the link in the main post.
i didnt notice it, ive been here at my moms house on a shitty 56K so i havent had time to do annything but none the less its fixed.

[Username123]

I simply dont like America now cause Bush is giving it a bad look. Before Bush I was with America now with America. But still USA has everything from Hollywood to NBA

[COOLmac©]

But still USA has everything from Hollywood to NBA

including weapons of mass destruction. honestly who would dare oppose US and not end up humilating themselves?

[Riot]

America isn't the only country with WMD. It's just the U.N. knows America won't use it for harm in anyway unless it's for extreme protection only. It's those countries with unstable governments (evil dicators, unstable economies) and terrorism floating around every street-corner that shouldn't have WMDs.

[Username123]

So you are saying every country expect America is a terrorist country?

[cyanide]

So you are saying every country expect America is a terrorist country?

I don't understand what you're asking for, but what Riot is saying is that America is allowed to use WMDs because they're entrusted by the UN to protect the world from terrorists and dictators. Except, I would like to add that America is pretty picky about where they would like to bomb unless somebody pisses them off.

[Riot]

I'm not saying other countries are terrorists, because other countries do have WMD and America and the U.N. don't really care. There are countries you can trust and countries you can't. That's the bottom line.

[Username123]

I cant trust America, they can just invade a country for any reason they want. I dont find that safe, Iraq had no WMD and America still attacked Iraq. I cant trust America cause they make any country look like a bad country, but i am just a 15yr old so it dosent matter weather i trust America or not.

[Riot]

So you don't think Saddam killing millions of innocent Iraqi lives is worth invading?

If America steps in and helps they get criticized.
If they stay aside and watch they get criticized.

I don't know what you mean you can't trust America. America isn't going to invade every country so they can be the most powerful country in the world and so they can control everyone and everything. The middle-east is in ruins right now, I don't have any problem with countries (America isn't alone) stepping in and trying to help out. We are all humans, don't humans deserve democracy? Don't they deserve to be free?

Do you think America is going to use WMD to kill millions of innocent lives (especially after the atom bomb...we learned our lesson. Actually, the world did. Everyone knows the true effects of a nuke now.) Do you trust America with a WMD or do you trust North Korea with one?

[Username123]

So you don't think Saddam killing millions of innocent Iraqi lives is worth invading?

Yes he was wrong for his actions but that dosent mean America should just put its nose in a country problem. If you want to put ur nose in a country's trouble, there are many countries in the world that are in trouble such as Palestine/Israel, Bosnia and much more. What about helping them where ppl are dying?

If America steps in and helps they get criticized.
If they stay aside and watch they get criticized.

Yea since the Vietnam war where America just came in the middle agian no one liked it. No one asked for America to come in and "help" Iraq from Saddam. There are many Saddam supporters than Saddam haters. If America stayed out of Iraq's problem and Iraq itself deal with it, no one would criticize America. As matter of fact why would anyone criticize America?? They are not the Daddy of the world that they have to help everyone.

The middle-east is in ruins right now, I don't have any problem with countries (America isn't alone) stepping in and trying to help out

I dont see Middle-East is in the ruins, they are all muslims countries and most of the time Saudi Arabia and others always help out thier neighbouring countries. You might not have a problem with someone coming into ur country and putting troops everywhere and killing people who think they are terrorists but Iraqi ppl dont like Americans coming into thier country and staying there after they are dont "helping" Iraq by taking out Saddam.

Do you think America is going to use WMD to kill millions of innocent lives (especially after the atom bomb...we learned our lesson. Actually, the world did. Everyone knows the true effects of a nuke now.) Do you trust America with a WMD or do you trust North Korea with one?

I dunno if America is gonna use WMD or not. After using destructive weapons in Afghanistan against ppl who only had Ak-47s to fight , i dont think America is not gonna use WMD against stronger countries like Korea and others. I rather trust N.Korea cause i dont see them putting thier noses in other countries business.

Whoo, long post better go eat now.

[cyanide]

I don't trust anybody with a WMD.

And the middle east would be in ruins even if America did step in, which could even make it worse. And if you read America: The Book, there's not so much democracy as it looks in America today.

[Riot]

WOW.

First off, get your facts straight buddy. Most Iraqi civilians DO want America in Iraq. The extremists and the Saddam followers don't like America, but the civilians love Americans there and generally want America to STAY there. You really think the civilians rather have Saddam in power rather than have them vote their own president in? Give me a break. I know three soliders that use to be in Iraq (and one still currently in Baghdad). Civilians LOVE American soliders there because they know America is trying to help.

America shouldn't stick our nose into other people's busy? Give me a break. At one point in time I thought helping each other out and making sure other countries don't kill themselves was a good thing to do. I guess we shouldn't stick our nose into poor people's problems either. It's not our buisness. Also, the tsnaumi thing. Fuck them too, right? I mean, it doesn't concern me or anything so why should America or any other country even give money or relief efforts?

Seriously man, I think it's a responability for free nations to try and stop the genocide and start making changes. No more of this sit on your ass and watch from the sidelines crap, ok? I don't know about you but I want a country that actually wants to help other people out instead of standing still watching people die. Yes, people are dying in the war but you know what? When it's all said and done Iraq will be a much better place.

We obviously have different views. But I think you are just trying to agrue just to agrue because your comments of you rather having North Korea with nuclear weapons than America is just plain silly. You really think America is going to get into a nuclear war with North Korea? My guess is America won't even lead a charge into North Korea mostly because China wants to deal with them. If China goes to war with North Korea or invades them America will be there but merely as help.

The world is a better place without Saddam in power. Just ask the Kurds.

[cyanide]

First off, get your facts straight buddy. Most Iraqi civilians DO want America in Iraq. The extremists and the Saddam followers don't like America, but the civilians love Americans there and generally want America to STAY there. You really think the civilians rather have Saddam in power rather than have them vote their own president in? Give me a break. I know three soliders that use to be in Iraq (and one still currently in Baghdad). Civilians LOVE American soliders there because they know America is trying to help.

Most Iraqi civilians, eh? I'm sure there's a lot of Iraqi civilians are cursing the US for their irresponsible "accidential deaths" of 100 000+ innocent civilians. Of course they rather have Saddam ousted, but you think they're happy with the daily suicide bombers and living in constant fear? And what about the things the US don't want you to know, like torture and reckless behavior?

America shouldn't stick our nose into other people's busy? Give me a break. At one point in time I thought helping each other out and making sure other countries don't kill themselves was a good thing to do. I guess we shouldn't stick our nose into poor people's problems either. It's not our buisness. Also, the tsnaumi thing. Fuck them too, right? I mean, it doesn't concern me or anything so why should America or any other country even give money or relief efforts?

If you think you're so brilliant, then why the hell did America leave Saddam in power for more than a decade? If it wasn't for 9/11, George W. Bush wouldn't have a sorry ass excuse to invade the middle east and use "terrorists" as scapegoats. As for the tsunami thing, that was overhyped, and they got way more money that can be invested in other world crisises that is sadly ignored, thanks to the media.

Seriously man, I think it's a responability for free nations to try and stop the genocide and start making changes. No more of this sit on your ass and watch from the sidelines crap, ok? I don't know about you but I want a country that actually wants to help other people out instead of standing still watching people die. Yes, people are dying in the war but you know what? When it's all said and done Iraq will be a much better place.

Seriously man, I think something should be done about the genocides that are going on in Africa. Too bad nobody gives a flying shiite. Mark my words, Iraq won't see any improvements for a long, long time, and may never see improvements at all because of $$$. If they do improve, it's for the US' benefit - and I mean business benefit. Think - oil. Like I said, the US was standing in the sidelines a little too long, a little too late.

We obviously have different views. But I think you are just trying to agrue just to agrue because your comments of you rather having North Korea with nuclear weapons than America is just plain silly. You really think America is going to get into a nuclear war with North Korea? My guess is America won't even lead a charge into North Korea mostly because China wants to deal with them. If China goes to war with North Korea or invades them America will be there but merely as help.

I actually said in another post that the US should be more concerned about North Korea than Iraq, so don't make assumptions. And I never said anything about wanting North Korea to have nuclear weapons rather than the US. If the US spent billions and billions of dollars in bribes to assassinate Il-Jong, then that'd probably be a lot easier than worrying about Iraq's "WMDs"

The world is a better place without Saddam in power. Just ask the Kurds.

Yes, and ask the Kurds which country supplied the Iraqis with weapons so the Kurds could suffer. (hint: the good o' red white and blue)