Presenting Vida Guerra!
Mon Dec 06, 2004 7:22 am
Thoughts?
Mon Dec 06, 2004 7:23 am
Let's pray that this is fake!!!
Re: Presenting Vida Guerra!
Mon Dec 06, 2004 8:01 am
meh i dont care shes still hott as hell-
- (my old sig)
- (my old sig)
Mon Dec 06, 2004 8:39 am
Damn, the wall behind here got f-ing dirty from all that Photoshop work. 
Mon Dec 06, 2004 8:55 am
I'd still bang her just for the sake of telling my feat to everyone. 
Mon Dec 06, 2004 9:12 am
Mon Dec 06, 2004 9:50 am
j.23 wrote:
lol! I'm stealing that. *yoink*
Mon Dec 06, 2004 11:23 am
Donatello wrote:j.23 wrote:
lol! I'm stealing that. *yoink*
Me too!!!
Mon Dec 06, 2004 12:11 pm
j.23 wrote:
what he said
Mon Dec 06, 2004 1:07 pm
I'd hit it.
With a pole.
With a pole.
Mon Dec 06, 2004 1:25 pm
In the very first photo, she looks like one of the Zombies from Shaun of the Dead. I mean, damn, it must be faked...because how could a sober human being show up for a photo shoot looking like that?
Just another reason why I hate airbrushing.
Just another reason why I hate airbrushing.
Mon Dec 06, 2004 1:41 pm
Regarding the 2nd pic, I think it's somewhat normal... big-butted woman have those holes in their behinds (I don't know the exact word in English)...
But I'd still hit her.
But I'd still hit her.
Mon Dec 06, 2004 3:02 pm
Tales wrote:big-butted woman have those holes in their behinds
lmao that seriously had me rolling for a while
btw it's called celluilite
Mon Dec 06, 2004 3:20 pm
Its obvious its a big ass fake....but im sure if u take her layers of make up away she becomes just another big butted ugly b*h
Mon Dec 06, 2004 7:43 pm
Tales wrote:I'd still bang her just for the sake of telling my feat to everyone.
word to mutha
Mon Dec 06, 2004 8:10 pm
if the "scary" pic is real i just hope you all know the camera lens doesn't pick up detail and colour like the human eye thats the reason for all the "touchup" work after, but even still the original has some shit lighting to try and balanc out and eliminate the camera lens inperfections just look at how much they had to change the hue of the original imge...plus the lack of makeup doesn't help. The photography process is such a shit thing it takes like 20 minutes for the setup to get the apatures lighting and focus right. An hour or so in makeup to get the thick ass layer of foundation and lipstick eye liner and blush right. all just for what might be a 5 minute at most taking the actual photos.
Mon Dec 06, 2004 10:04 pm
][]]RAGON wrote:if the "scary" pic is real i just hope you all know the camera lens doesn't pick up detail and colour like the human eye thats the reason for all the "touchup" work after, but even still the original has some shit lighting to try and balanc out and eliminate the camera lens inperfections just look at how much they had to change the hue of the original imge...plus the lack of makeup doesn't help. The photography process is such a shit thing it takes like 20 minutes for the setup to get the apatures lighting and focus right. An hour or so in makeup to get the thick ass layer of foundation and lipstick eye liner and blush right. all just for what might be a 5 minute at most taking the actual photos.
Someones been modelling
Mon Dec 06, 2004 10:11 pm
nah I've just done photography for a couple of years.
Mon Dec 06, 2004 10:33 pm
i still love her 
and i'd hit it.... then again.. who wouldnt? 
and i'd hit it.... then again.. who wouldnt?
Mon Dec 06, 2004 10:44 pm
Mazzlow wrote:i still love her
Anyone with standards?
Mon Dec 06, 2004 11:48 pm
Jae™ wrote:Mazzlow wrote:i still love her
Anyone with standards?
Not me mate, i love that "cottage cheese" ass.
Tue Dec 07, 2004 6:14 am
hey, the fake's on the left 
Tue Dec 07, 2004 7:19 am
none the less.... 
Fri Dec 10, 2004 6:19 am
It seemed to be too good...she should buy those cellulictis pants from TV shop...Id hit her no doubt.
Fri Dec 10, 2004 10:00 am
Where I'm from we don't call it cottage cheese we call it bullet-holes.