Disney Movies. (Joke)

Other video games, TV shows, movies, general chit-chat...this is an all-purpose off-topic board where you can talk about anything that doesn't have its own dedicated section.

Disney Movies. (Joke)

Postby Jackal on Wed Aug 25, 2004 8:15 am

Hi, I feel like coming up with theories today, so I will.

Who else, besides me, thinks Disney is a very very bad company for kids?

They promote negativity through-out all their movies, it's abnormal.

You must be wondering what the fuck I'm talking about, right? Well...let's take a look now.

Look at Snow White & The Seven Dwarves. We all know the story blah blah blah blah. Did you guys see how they made the delicious fruit called an apple into the bad guy? Did you see how they encourage kids NOT to eat an apple? Shouldn't we be teaching our kids that apples are yummy & un-harmful? Shouldn't we be teaching our kids that eating apples have alot of benifits? Shouldn't we be teaching our kids that eating apples is good for them, they will grow up to be strong etc because apples have so many nutritions?

Another part, have you seen the forest the dwarves live in? Mushrooms all around, they are blatantly encouraging kids to use mushrooms. They want kids to be high. They downplay the good factors of apples & tell them to get high on mushrooms. Is this wrong or is this wrong?

Look at The Little Mermaid, suddenly fish people are a bad thing. Wow, we must strive to have legs. All those who don't have legs suck. We need legs. In other words, handicapped people that don't have legs suck. If they did they would walk all funny. They are blatantly making fun of another persons handicap. Is this what we want our kids to do? Mock the less fortunate health wise?

Look at the enviroment in The Little Mermaid, they are underwater & all over the place what do you see? Not so much coral, not so many bubbles, you see a shit load of sea weed! See, there's the drug factor again. They want the kids to be high. They want them to smoke weed. They encourage them to smoke weed. What's going on?!?!

Look at Cinderella, they promote such negativity towards step mothers/sisters. A while ago we used to think, OMG her stepmother must be an evil cunniving bitch. OMG!! Why do they promote this negativity?

Another thing that irks me about Cinderella...they don't care about pumpkins & lizards. The girl was given a nice pretty white carriage with white horses. A pumkin was magically transformed into a pumpkin & lizards were magically transformed into horses. After the whole she-bang, Cinderella ran back home while the carriage & horses turned back into pumpkins & lizards. Later on in the movie, the prince comes to get Cinderella because of her glass slipper & she lives happily ever after.
Did anyone stop to think what happened to those fucking lizards & that pumpkin? No! Why? Why must we neglect the little folks? Why couldn't the pumpkin be turned into a carriage permanantly? The pumpkin was probably felt to Cinderella's children. The lizards were probably squashed by the carriage in which Ms Cinderella rode. :cry:

Who cares about a pumpkin & a couple of lizards, right? Guess what?!?! I DO!!

Look at Rappunzle, the jist of the story was that she got saved due to her long hair. What are they promoting here? That girls should have long hair & wait around for princes to come along, hurt them by climbing their hair and then "rescue" them. What's up with that? Why are girls stereotyped as helpless ladies who can't stand up for themselves? Look at G.I. Jane, she didn't have a strand of hair on her head. Look how far she got (and how hot Demi Moore is)...

Is this the kind of image we want our kids to grow up with? Smoke weed, make fun of handicaps & be the un-independant house wife whilst the male takes care of everything? What's the world coming to I ask you?! Does anyone have an answer?

Oh, just a throw in: Those little blue bastards that call themselves the Smurfs are high 24/7, they even live in mushrooms. Speaks for itself I think. (Bad Hannah/Barbera)

Shame shame shame!! :oops:

In case you guys were not too sure, I'm joking. :P
User avatar
Jackal
 
Posts: 14877
Joined: Fri Mar 21, 2003 2:59 am

Postby Mikki on Wed Aug 25, 2004 12:51 pm

You watch too much TV pal. :P
Mikki
 
Posts: 4601
Joined: Sun Jun 15, 2003 3:22 pm
Location: Manila, Pilipinas

Postby J@3 on Wed Aug 25, 2004 3:58 pm

I read something similar to this in Mick Foleys autobiography.
User avatar
J@3
 
Posts: 19815
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 3:25 pm
Location: MLB

Postby Stevan on Wed Aug 25, 2004 11:25 pm

I read something similar to this in Mick Foleys autobiography.

Well then... it must be true. Shiat! Mick Foley dawg, that books like da bible :D

No but really, was that book any good?

Oh and Jackal,

Look at The Little Mermaid, suddenly fish people are a bad thing. Wow, we must strive to have legs. All those who don't have legs suck. We need legs. In other words, handicapped people that don't have legs suck.
Yeah... because they can't walk :lol: I'm only kidding of course.

Look at Cinderella, they promote such negativity towards step mothers/sisters. A while ago we used to think, OMG her stepmother must be an evil cunniving bitch. OMG!! Why do they promote this negativity?

Now I know you're fucking around! Negativity towards step mothers, mothers in law, sisters in law... you wouldn't be a man without it.

Look at Rappunzle, the jist of the story was that she got saved due to her long hair. What are they promoting here? That girls should have long hair & wait around for princes to come along, hurt them by climbing their hair and then "rescue" them. What's up with that? Why are girls stereotyped as helpless ladies who can't stand up for themselves? Look at G.I. Jane, she didn't have a strand of hair on her head. Look how far she got (and how hot Demi Moore is)...

G.I. Jane is a big lesbo! As men, should we be promoting some chick who thinks she's a guy, or a chick who's gonna let you climb all over her, and think you're a hero for it? I'll take the latter :P

LOL what a thread. No seriousness here. And Jackal, if you were being serious, sorry man :oops:
User avatar
Stevan
 
Posts: 1509
Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2002 10:10 pm
Location: Melbourne

Postby J@3 on Wed Aug 25, 2004 11:58 pm

Well then... it must be true. Shiat! Mick Foley dawg, that books like da bible

No but really, was that book any good?


Both of his books are really good, surprisingly so considering he's a wrestler and wrestling sucks balls.
User avatar
J@3
 
Posts: 19815
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 3:25 pm
Location: MLB

Postby Jackal on Thu Aug 26, 2004 3:36 am

Yeah, I was just playing around. Note the title of the thread.

It's a pretty good thought out thing though, gotta give me that much.
Oh, and if you guys were wondering, I never read that persons book.
User avatar
Jackal
 
Posts: 14877
Joined: Fri Mar 21, 2003 2:59 am

Postby The GOAT on Thu Aug 26, 2004 6:36 am

Another thing that irks me about Cinderella...they don't care about pumpkins & lizards. The girl was given a nice pretty white carriage with white horses. A pumkin was magically transformed into a pumpkin & lizards were magically transformed into horses. After the whole she-bang, Cinderella ran back home while the carriage & horses turned back into pumpkins & lizards. Later on in the movie, the prince comes to get Cinderella because of her glass slipper & she lives happily ever after.
Did anyone stop to think what happened to those fucking lizards & that pumpkin? No! Why? Why must we neglect the little folks? Why couldn't the pumpkin be turned into a carriage permanantly? The pumpkin was probably felt to Cinderella's children. The lizards were probably squashed by the carriage in which Ms Cinderella rode.

Who cares about a pumpkin & a couple of lizards, right? Guess what?!?! I DO!!


You must have been really bored when you wrote this thread.[/quote]
Image

There is no truth. There is only you and what you make the truth.
The GOAT
 
Posts: 3197
Joined: Mon Oct 06, 2003 11:06 am
Location: Long Island, New York

Postby Jackal on Thu Aug 26, 2004 7:13 am

Bored? Why would you say something like that? A bit demented, senile, moronic...even calling me a jackass wouldn't hurt as bad as being said I was bored.

I wanted to share my intellectuality and this is how you repay me?! I'll send those Smurfs to hump your toes!! :x
User avatar
Jackal
 
Posts: 14877
Joined: Fri Mar 21, 2003 2:59 am

Postby . on Thu Aug 26, 2004 7:36 am

Yeah the Smurfs were stoned 24-7, Family Guy made a funny skit about them once:

Smurf 1: Hey, you had a good time last night?
Smurf 2: Smurf-tacular
Smurf 1: Yeah I saw you leave with Smurfette
Smurf 2: Oh man, as soon as we got out of the bar, she started smurfing me
Smurf 1: Shut the Smurf up
Smurf 2: Yeah
Smurf 1: Right in the Smurfing parkinglot?
Smurf 2: Smurf yeah
Smurf 1: Oh that is freakin Smurf (gives high five)


:lol:
.
 
Posts: 3706
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2002 10:02 pm

Re: Disney Movies. (Joke)

Postby Andrew on Thu Aug 26, 2004 11:39 pm

Jackass wrote:Another part, have you seen the forest the dwarves live in? Mushrooms all around, they are blatantly encouraging kids to use mushrooms. They want kids to be high. They downplay the good factors of apples & tell them to get high on mushrooms. Is this wrong or is this wrong?


Lewis Carroll's Alice in Wonderland (which Disney also made into an animated film) actually does seem to promote drug use, with Alice taking strange substances and going on a fantastic adventure through such a strange "Wonderland".
User avatar
Andrew
Retro Basketball Gamer
Administrator
 
Posts: 115136
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2002 8:51 pm
Location: Australia

Postby Jackal on Fri Aug 27, 2004 12:34 am

Well Sebastian told me about this one, but I haven't checked it out yet.

In Disney's the Lion King, when Simba & his son look up into the stars, the stars apparently spell the word "SEX". I'll have to look it up soon, but what's going on at Walt Disney? :o
User avatar
Jackal
 
Posts: 14877
Joined: Fri Mar 21, 2003 2:59 am

Postby hmm on Fri Aug 27, 2004 12:37 am

.................................
Last edited by hmm on Tue Jun 02, 2009 3:05 am, edited 1 time in total.
hmm
 
Posts: 2058
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2003 2:06 am

Postby Null17 on Fri Aug 27, 2004 12:46 am

Null17
 
Posts: 4543
Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2004 6:55 pm
Location: Philippines

Postby Guest on Fri Aug 27, 2004 7:23 pm

Jae. wrote:I read something similar to this in Mick Foleys autobiography.


Is that the guy with the SOCK!
Guest
 

Postby Null17 on Fri Aug 27, 2004 7:43 pm

BeefEater wrote:
Jae. wrote:I read something similar to this in Mick Foleys autobiography.


Is that the guy with the SOCK!


yep
Null17
 
Posts: 4543
Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2004 6:55 pm
Location: Philippines

Postby Donte Thomas on Sat Aug 28, 2004 2:09 pm

you know the wrestler, mankind.
Donte Thomas
 
Posts: 279
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Postby Andrew on Sat Aug 28, 2004 5:53 pm

Null17 wrote:http://www.snopes.com/disney/films/films.asp

check this out....


Some interesting myths there. It seems a lot of people really want to believe that Disney is bad for kids though, with an agenda to expose them to adult material.
User avatar
Andrew
Retro Basketball Gamer
Administrator
 
Posts: 115136
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2002 8:51 pm
Location: Australia


Return to Off-Topic

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests