Fri Sep 21, 2007 1:19 pm
Pera wrote:I think age plays a role here too.
Matthew wrote:The second one was the true of false thread, and Cyanide said: True or false this thread will be locked.
Jae wrote:What I'm curious about is how many of the current mods are/want to be actual moderators, and how many want to be posters with a moderator badge?
Fri Sep 21, 2007 2:12 pm
But just in case you ask, I will list them as to limit my spamming. Emiliano: "I actually enjoy having you around", Sam.: "I really had mad respected for you", zmac: "Are you leaving, or getting banned? Becoz either way its bullshit! We are name BROTHERS! You gotta stay bro, come on!", the list goes on...
Oh, and I remembered to finish the size tag on this one.
Fri Sep 21, 2007 2:33 pm
cyanide wrote:Matthew wrote:The second one was the true of false thread, and Cyanide said: True or false this thread will be locked.
The thread clearly became a spam thread, and I've seen many threads like those end up getting locked. Nice try, asshole.
Fri Sep 21, 2007 3:49 pm
JT, sorry, lost many respect points from me.
Fri Sep 21, 2007 7:16 pm
JT_55 wrote:I guess I still haven't learned that nothing good ever comes out of aruging with Jackal.
Fri Sep 21, 2007 11:10 pm
JT_55 wrote:this place is where is you act stupid, you will be treated as a retard right away? Fair enough. But I'm not saying that we should all be so patient that we should be like "oh, that's all right, keep trying" to people who made several hundreds of stupid posts, just not jump on them right away.
JT_55 wrote:Hmm...I guess my plan backfired
I guess I still haven't learned that nothing good ever comes out of aruging with Jackal.
Sat Sep 22, 2007 5:06 am
Sat Sep 22, 2007 5:10 am
You wanna see some lively forums bring back Coolmac and Dweaver, as much as we hated them those were the best days of the forums
Sat Sep 22, 2007 5:24 am
Sat Sep 22, 2007 6:09 am
No seriously ...
Jae c'mon I mean, you have to admit you enjoyed cracking on those fools 24/7. And bring back your weekly thread those rocked so much!
Sat Sep 22, 2007 7:15 am
Just drop the hidden plans/agendas JT_55, and post 'naturally'. It's enjoyable that way.
Oh, if one of your plans is amassing an e-army in the NLSC, I'll never forgive your sorry ass.
Sat Sep 22, 2007 7:34 am
DoobieKnicks wrote:as much as we hated them those were the best days of the forums from when i was here, and well I'm going to start posting more often.
Sat Sep 22, 2007 7:39 am
Sat Sep 22, 2007 7:58 am
Sat Sep 22, 2007 9:33 am
DoobieKnicks wrote:Seriously, when I first joined these forums, these guys were spammers but they were huge contributors in one way or another to this site.
Sun Sep 23, 2007 12:09 am
JT_55 wrote:Man, I was just joking. I don't have any hidden plans. Contrary to what you guys might think, I actually have a life outside the internet.
Sun Sep 23, 2007 2:04 am
Mon Oct 01, 2007 9:26 pm
Mon Oct 01, 2007 9:36 pm
Matthew wrote:So 2 and a half weeks after this thread was created, and there seems to be no development in the Jae for admin decision.
Some things never change.
Mon Oct 01, 2007 9:50 pm
Mon Oct 01, 2007 10:08 pm
Perhaps all of us aren't i agreement for Jae to be made admin.
Mon Oct 01, 2007 10:24 pm
Matthew wrote:I don't see an improvement though. Do you want me to say "yes, fantastic work!" when nothing has been done to improve anything?
Matthew wrote:I don't want to see this place fall victim to complacency, because in reality it has taken years and years for things to implemented.
Matthew wrote:The same thing is happening here. I'm not just having a bitch because i'm bored. I'm pointing out the consistant and very worrying decline of participation of NLSC.
Matthew wrote:If there's only one person at the top (by design) then they should be responsible, no?
Matthew wrote:I'm not going to respond to how you think about me. I couldn't care less.
Matthew wrote: I'd much rather see what ideas you have to improve posting quality and quantity here.
Jae wrote:Normally I'd ignore it but I have to comment on this...Perhaps all of us aren't i agreement for Jae to be made admin.
With all due respect, the decision is Andrew's and Andrew's alone. The idea of some team members (none of which have been team members for more than 10 months) having a say in who is made admin on this forum is quite ridiculous. Anyway, I just thought that was an odd thing of you to say, especially as I've had no one tell me they would have a problem with the arrangement. Nor has Andrew as far as I'm aware.
Mon Oct 01, 2007 10:41 pm
Mon Oct 01, 2007 11:06 pm
Mon Oct 01, 2007 11:46 pm