Tue Sep 06, 2005 4:04 am
I did a VC one for myself:
Tue Sep 06, 2005 4:15 am
I love the BG! The picture should be a high quality one, it looks blurry, the text is pretty good too
Tue Sep 06, 2005 4:22 am
thats nice man 
Tue Sep 06, 2005 5:03 am
Da King23 wrote:I love the BG! The picture should be a high quality one, it looks blurry, the text is pretty good too
Thanks!I'll try better with the pic next time, but I think it looks awesome!
cq wrote:thats nice man Thumbs Up Thumbs Up Thumbs Up Thumbs Up Thumbs Up
Thanks
Tue Sep 06, 2005 5:09 am
Looks very cool. Nice background.
The VC pic is blurry and I'm not sure if you did a poor job cutting it, or if that's supposed to be a white stroke. But it doesn't look good. And the stroke on the text is too thick. Also take a look at my Player/photo effects tutorial for stuff on making your player photos look better.
The VC pic is blurry and I'm not sure if you did a poor job cutting it, or if that's supposed to be a white stroke. But it doesn't look good. And the stroke on the text is too thick. Also take a look at my Player/photo effects tutorial for stuff on making your player photos look better.
Tue Sep 06, 2005 5:10 am
as for VC's pic its a thin stroke, i don't cut them out so badly!
Tue Sep 06, 2005 5:18 am
Bad VC pic, but the rest is really good.
Tue Sep 06, 2005 5:24 am
John WB wrote:Bad VC pic, but the rest is really good.
yep i agree...nice BG and text, just do somethin different to that pic
Tue Sep 06, 2005 6:54 am
Redo:
Tue Sep 06, 2005 7:22 am
The background looks familliar, I like it. I like when people use those cross brushes.
Thu Sep 08, 2005 1:38 pm
here is rashad mccants sig:
Thu Sep 08, 2005 1:44 pm
thats a good sig but like the VC one maybe try a different pic?
Thu Sep 08, 2005 1:50 pm
nah...i liek the way it is.Or u r talking about the old version of my VC sig?
Thu Sep 08, 2005 2:13 pm
the older version
Thu Sep 08, 2005 2:17 pm
christian wrote:the older version
He already... but.. he just.. gah! Can someone really be that dumb?
Thu Sep 08, 2005 2:20 pm
him 
Thu Sep 08, 2005 2:23 pm
i meant the mccants sig...
Thu Sep 08, 2005 4:20 pm
christian wrote:thats a good sig but like the VC one maybe try a different pic?
He said : " That's a good sig, but like the VC one, maybe try a different pic? "
Thu Sep 08, 2005 8:59 pm
Man, It's good, I like the pic. ... Maybe try another text
... Maybe try another text
Fri Sep 09, 2005 4:54 am
no...i like this text!
Fri Sep 09, 2005 5:38 am
So try making it smaller, It doesn't fit 
Fri Sep 09, 2005 6:07 am
I agree, the text kills it, as far as there was anything to kill.
Nah j/k, it's pretty good, but really the text is too big, too ordinary and all-capitals doesn't really look good.
Nah j/k, it's pretty good, but really the text is too big, too ordinary and all-capitals doesn't really look good.
Sat Sep 10, 2005 10:33 am
The G.O.A.T. wrote:The background looks familliar, I like it. I like when people use those cross brushes.
Would anyone mind linking me to download those brushes??
Sat Sep 10, 2005 11:08 am
Da King23 wrote:The G.O.A.T. wrote:The background looks familliar, I like it. I like when people use those cross brushes.
Would anyone mind linking me to download those brushes??
You can make your own. Make a document that's 5 x 5 or something and use the pencil to draw a line across the middle both ways. Then edit-->define brush in a brushset that is yours. You don't want them popping up in a fractals set.
Sat Sep 10, 2005 11:12 am
Thanks Colin! 