Tue Nov 23, 2004 3:49 pm
I vote for 450x100 , PLEASE DONT HURT ME 
Tue Nov 23, 2004 3:56 pm
450-100
signed, DonatelloForPres
signed, DonatelloForPres
Tue Nov 23, 2004 4:21 pm
450*100, RuffRyder's suggestion is great.
Tue Nov 23, 2004 5:22 pm
colin826 wrote:450*100, RuffRyder's suggestion is great.
Tue Nov 23, 2004 5:33 pm
450x100... and yeah, Ruffryders suggestion is good.
Btw, my sig is 442x113... would I have to change this or is it close enough to the sig limits?
Btw, my sig is 442x113... would I have to change this or is it close enough to the sig limits?
Tue Nov 23, 2004 7:26 pm
yup even I got a prob cause mines 400x130 (close to that)
but I dunno I dont think my signatures is too disturbing to the public....but if we gotta stick by the absolute rules then I change my vote to 450x150
but I dunno I dont think my signatures is too disturbing to the public....but if we gotta stick by the absolute rules then I change my vote to 450x150
Tue Nov 23, 2004 8:50 pm
450*150
Wed Nov 24, 2004 12:41 am
150
Wed Nov 24, 2004 6:18 am
LOL @ this AZN_EDIIE dude, he has 3 pictures in his sig and they are in the following size: 560x335, 560x420 and 560x420
Wed Nov 24, 2004 9:59 am
LOL @ this AZN_EDIIE dude, he has 3 pictures in his sig and they are in the following size: 560x335, 560x420 and 560x420
Lmao just saw it a few minutes ago
Wed Nov 24, 2004 12:47 pm
AZN_EDIIE's signature, shrunken down so it doesn't take up so much space:
This is nuts. I have PMed him with no reply.
This is nuts. I have PMed him with no reply.
Wed Nov 24, 2004 9:47 pm
I've removed it and added a note about signature limits in its place.
Mon Dec 06, 2004 7:53 am
il vote for 450x100.
i n putting avatar they wont allow us to put bigger than a cetain size (dimension or kb). can this features be used in putting signature. i mean if we put a huge sig, it will not allow us to update our profile or maybe won't show up automatcally.
i just hate to see very big sig in this forum.
i n putting avatar they wont allow us to put bigger than a cetain size (dimension or kb). can this features be used in putting signature. i mean if we put a huge sig, it will not allow us to update our profile or maybe won't show up automatcally.
i just hate to see very big sig in this forum.
Mon Dec 06, 2004 7:56 am
Donatello wrote:AZN_EDIIE's signature, shrunken down so it doesn't take up so much space:
This is nuts. I have PMed him with no reply.
haha why woudl annybody make their sig that big? *sigh* damn n00bs
i'll shrink mine down a bit too, MAYBE..... *thinks*
Last edited by Old Mazzlow on Mon Dec 06, 2004 7:59 am, edited 1 time in total.
Mon Dec 06, 2004 7:57 am
Yeah, why not 450*100...
I will change my sig's size then...
I will change my sig's size then...
Mon Dec 06, 2004 9:16 pm
Sounds like 450x100 is the most popular choice, but the decision isn't final yet so if anyone has any further suggestions as to a better size now would be a great time to mention them. 
Tue Dec 07, 2004 9:41 am
hey mazzlo...if i'm not mistaken, it's spelled "surprise"
Tue Dec 07, 2004 3:35 pm
Mazzlow wrote:haha why woudl annybody make their sig that big? *sigh* damn n00bs
Oh the irony.
Tue Dec 07, 2004 6:32 pm
How come he is still allowed to have a sig about rape?
Tue Dec 07, 2004 11:29 pm
Because it annoys you.
Wed Dec 08, 2004 1:03 am
450x100 sounds good to me. 
I think the the rape-justification signature is rather disturbing aswell...
I think the the rape-justification signature is rather disturbing aswell...
Wed Dec 08, 2004 5:42 am
Donatello wrote:hey mazzlo...if i'm not mistaken, it's spelled "surprise"
yea it is, I didn't make it though.
Jae™ wrote:Mazzlow wrote:haha why woudl annybody make their sig that big? *sigh* damn n00bs
Oh the irony.
Mines Not Too Big.
Jowe wrote:How come he is still allowed to have a sig about rape?
I got it taken away at Dot Org, not here.
Wed Dec 08, 2004 5:46 am
He wasn't refering to the size of it...Mazzlow wrote:Jae™ wrote:Mazzlow wrote:haha why woudl annybody make their sig that big? *sigh* damn n00bs
Oh the irony.
Mines Not Too Big.
I'm not sure having that sig of yours is a very good idea man
Wed Dec 08, 2004 5:51 am
*sigh*
Me in another thread wrote:ok ok. seems a lot of people here are finding my sig offencive/inappropriate. Personally, I didnt think it would raise such a uproar but i was wrong. I personally, thought the original picture was quite funny when i first saw it on "Woth 1000" but apparently, i'm one of the few people that feels this way. Call me an insencitive bastard but "my bad." I guess its back to the turtle sig?
Wed Dec 08, 2004 9:52 am
Mazzlow wrote:*sigh*Me in another thread wrote:ok ok. seems a lot of people here are finding my sig offencive/inappropriate. Personally, I didnt think it would raise such a uproar but i was wrong. I personally, thought the original picture was quite funny when i first saw it on "Woth 1000" but apparently, i'm one of the few people that feels this way. Call me an insencitive bastard but "my bad." I guess its back to the turtle sig?
You insensitive bastard!
