Personally, I don't believe that is the reason, and I don't think it is the U.S.'s business.
Sadaam is not Hitler. One major difference between the two is that the U.S. never funded Hitler.

Kevin_93 wrote:It's all about cheap oil. It's a lot easier to get when you've raped and destroyed the country that has it.
When it comes to American politics, they think with their wallet instead of their brain.
Riot wrote:I'm in a movie?
Of course he does. Bush isn't a retard he knows you don't send people into war and get killed over oil. As stupid as Bush seems he isn't that idiotic. If he doesn't believe in this war then he wouldn't have called it in the first place. This is setting a statement.
I'm more proud to be American now than ever before. This speaks volume to the Terrorists, mess with us and we fuck you up. We found Saddam, Bin Laden your getting fucked up next.
TheCambyManVol3 wrote:I never took history in high school, but if im not mistaken, the North (backed by russia) would have demolished the south, forcing communisim on the whole country. It would be like nsw and victoria joining forces and taking over all of australia to force communisim.
Andrew wrote:The main difference is that terrorism tends to include innocent people as targets whereas war is aimed at governments and leaders but hits innocent people along the way. Obviously, neither is positive, but there are differences (subtle as they may be).
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests