Tue Jun 20, 2006 7:19 am
Tue Jun 20, 2006 7:42 am
Tue Jun 20, 2006 8:56 am
Bang wrote:A lot of people think the Patrick Viera heading was a "goal". However, here's proof that it wasn't.
http://2006bbs1.daum.net/griffin/do/worldcup/talk/read?bbsId=W001&articleId=50485&nil_profile=g&nil_specialboximg=3
For a goal to be scored, the ball must cross the line ENTIRELY, yet if you shift the ball down to see if the ball crossed the line entirely, you see that the ball did not cross the line entirely. ERGO, no goal.
I realize it is a Korean site, so you might consider it biased. But I'm just saying it wasn't that clear of a goal.
Tue Jun 20, 2006 9:40 am
dadamafia wrote:Bang wrote:A lot of people think the Patrick Viera heading was a "goal". However, here's proof that it wasn't.
http://2006bbs1.daum.net/griffin/do/worldcup/talk/read?bbsId=W001&articleId=50485&nil_profile=g&nil_specialboximg=3
For a goal to be scored, the ball must cross the line ENTIRELY, yet if you shift the ball down to see if the ball crossed the line entirely, you see that the ball did not cross the line entirely. ERGO, no goal.
I realize it is a Korean site, so you might consider it biased. But I'm just saying it wasn't that clear of a goal.
You have to consider that the picture they put doesnt have to be where the ball was farthest in the goal, they put the angle they feel like putting to make their best case. Also the computer generated images doesnt look very accurate. The shot where they had them side by side showed that the goal posts werent even parraled in both pics yet the goalie and the ball were exactly the same. I hope thats clear.
Anywyas, if you need a microscope to declare it wasnt a goal then to the human eye it should have been called as such since it wasnt blatantly obvious.
*Group tables updated on first page*
Tue Jun 20, 2006 10:38 am
Bang wrote:dadamafia wrote:Bang wrote:A lot of people think the Patrick Viera heading was a "goal". However, here's proof that it wasn't.
http://2006bbs1.daum.net/griffin/do/worldcup/talk/read?bbsId=W001&articleId=50485&nil_profile=g&nil_specialboximg=3
For a goal to be scored, the ball must cross the line ENTIRELY, yet if you shift the ball down to see if the ball crossed the line entirely, you see that the ball did not cross the line entirely. ERGO, no goal.
I realize it is a Korean site, so you might consider it biased. But I'm just saying it wasn't that clear of a goal.
You have to consider that the picture they put doesnt have to be where the ball was farthest in the goal, they put the angle they feel like putting to make their best case. Also the computer generated images doesnt look very accurate. The shot where they had them side by side showed that the goal posts werent even parraled in both pics yet the goalie and the ball were exactly the same. I hope thats clear.
Anywyas, if you need a microscope to declare it wasnt a goal then to the human eye it should have been called as such since it wasnt blatantly obvious.
*Group tables updated on first page*
You can say the exact opposite though. If you're not 100% sure it's a goal, how can you call it a goal? Anyhow, refs are part of the game. So bleah. FIFA isn't going to change their opinion.
Tue Jun 20, 2006 11:24 am
Tue Jun 20, 2006 11:25 am
Tue Jun 20, 2006 1:46 pm
Wed Jun 21, 2006 12:46 am
Wed Jun 21, 2006 2:01 am
Wed Jun 21, 2006 2:27 am
Wed Jun 21, 2006 2:43 am
Wed Jun 21, 2006 2:49 am
Wed Jun 21, 2006 2:53 am
Pera wrote:How much did Germany win?I didn't see the game?
Wed Jun 21, 2006 2:55 am
Wed Jun 21, 2006 3:26 am
Pera wrote:How much did Germany win?I didn't see the game?
Wed Jun 21, 2006 4:16 am
Wed Jun 21, 2006 4:19 am
Jugs wrote:just finished watching the delayed Poland v Costa Rica match, nice goals, didn't really care but I got the prediction correct in the prediction league.
Wed Jun 21, 2006 5:35 am
Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:58 am
Wed Jun 21, 2006 7:48 am
Jugs wrote:just finished watching the delayed Poland v Costa Rica match, nice goals, didn't really care but I got the prediction correct in the prediction league.
Wed Jun 21, 2006 9:27 am
I think Joe Cole's goal was the greatest till now
www.livescore.com is very useful, too. Tells u all the info from who scored to the teams formations
Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:45 pm
I think it was a great goal but...Cambiasso's goal against Serbia was just amazing. There were like 20 passes before the shot and that's what makes the goal unique.
Thu Jun 22, 2006 6:29 am
Joe. wrote:If you have Mozilla Firefox, just go to http://www.mozilla.com/add-ons/jogacompanion and you'll get a bar in the Firefox browser with the final results of the last 5 games or something like that.![]()