Shoes.

[Lean]

It looks like the one Joe posted except it's a lower cut (the pic has a mid-cut I think) and the laces are more of a light gray. Since it's a low cut the logo isn't on the side of the shoe but instead inside the shoe's heel and tongue part. The black part isn't leather but suede.

Cool, I have the plain black Chucks, low cuts too. But I don't wear it, my feet looks pointy when I wear them.

Just found out in wiki that I can use metal as an aglet. Sweet. Makes it easier to fix than my original idea of using a laminating machine to cover the end of the laces.

I use strips of packaging tapes as aglets, oh the resourcefulness.

[shadowgrin]

Don't you think I thought of that.
The scotch tapes are soft and not as hard as the original plastic it had.

[Lean]

That's why I seldom clean / wash my shoes that has laces on it.

I even settled for a pair of shoes that has no laces in it. It's called (EDIT) Puma Cell Clampdown.



Mine is in black-black colorway.

[shadowgrin]

Quick, tell me where you got that. I'm going to buy one. Cost? I'm into shoes that have no laces.
The Converse sneakers are my only shoes with laces. The closest thing I have with a "lace" is a custom made leather pair with straps.

[Lean]

I bought it 5 years ago at Some Mall (SM), it should be there among the Puma stalls in the department store. The shoes are very comfortable.

You could buy mine if you want, it is at a very good condition:

1. Unwashed since the day I bought it.
2. Has it sides ripped.
3. The "Cell" sole on the left shoe fell off somewhere.
4. The cool material wherein the Puma logo is sewn is completely ripped off.



EDIT: It costs like 2500 bucks when I bought it.

[shadowgrin]

I think this is the part where I tell you to "fuck-off".

[Lean]

I was being honest, shadow.

[shadowgrin]

So am I.