Joe' wrote:Anyways, the number of games released only on the PC platform in the last few years is still very small.
You cannot seriously say that. You have no clue how many PC-only games are released every single DAY...
Quality, legally-obtained software: 300$ if not more.
Anti-virus: (Norton 360 All-In-One Security): $80.
Anti-spyware: (Ad-Aware Plus): $20.
Firewall (ZoneAlarm): 40$/year.
Why would you pay for any of that, when you could get superior free open-source software?
Anyway, your silly price comparison...
iMac: $2299, 2.8Ghz Core2Duo, 2GB PC2-5300, 500GB SATA, 8XDVD-RW, Raedon HD 2600 PRO, 24-inch widescreen
I don't have time to build one myself right now, so I just fired up Dell, which I wouldn't buy personally: $2276, 2.4Ghz Q6600 Quad-Core, 2GB PC2-5300, 500GB SATA, 16xDVD-RW, GeForce 8600 GTS, 24-inch widescreen (+Vista Ultimate)
I know you can swap out that QuadCore for a C2D and upgrade to a 8800 GTS and stay UNDER $1600 without the monitor building yourself.
You're making yourself look like the preachy Mac-user who's trying to get everyone to convert. I mean, if you want to suggest a new computer, suggest your Mac and get out. There's no point in arguing with people who choose PCs because they want to play games and have no problems using Windows and it's mountains of software.
You have your Mac whenever you need a computer and you have your console whenever you feel like playing video games.
Yeah, but what if I want to play an online FPS or MMORPG? The two largest video game markets after Sports? Games that pretty much demand a keyboard/mouse interface. I have my PC for doing all my computing AND playing games I can only play on the PC, or play better on the PC. And I have a Wii, among other consoles for those games I can't play on the PC yet.
You will never have to upgrade a console, instead, because video games are specifically made to run on them.
And a Mac lasts a lot more than a PC without upgrading.
Because they're closed enviroments. When the hardware is locked, or one companies makes pretty much all the software, upgrading isn't needed as things don't advance as quickly.
Why wouldn't you pay more for a Mac, knowing it's better than a PC?
There's nothing that makes it better. It is only better if a person finds it to be better as you and cynaide and others do. That doesn't PROVE it is better, that simply says, for what you guys are doing, you find it better.
Anyway, I buy PCs over Macs the same way I pick consoles, it has the things I want. The Wii promised METROID PRIME THREE, the PC promises every piece of software I can think of.
I'm actually pretty sure a large portion of those games you listed were already released on the Mac platform.
He listed five games. Five out of the thousands that release each year for the PC. You may be able to play UT and WoW on your Mac from that list, but you will never be able to play Half Life 2/Counter-Strike without emulation. (Steam is Windows only...and Valve has declared it such for the foreseeable future. Linux is the only port they'd consider.)
I've played lots of video-games on machines with top-notch hardware, I didn't like it.
Alright, that's fine. Now take that logic and apply it to everyone who doesn't want to use a Mac.
Anyhoo, does anyone know if it's possible to hook a gaming console to an LCD monitor?
Yes, you just need the proper connectors. You can get them for pretty much any console. Even Dreamcast, which had official support. (While the PS2 did not...)