Jihad! Jihad in.. Burger King?

Other video games, TV shows, movies, general chit-chat...this is an all-purpose off-topic board where you can talk about anything that doesn't have its own dedicated section.

Postby Riot on Tue May 30, 2006 4:15 am

Well, I think it's obvious that the globe is going through a stage of warming but I'm more concerned with the pricks that think it's because of humans.
User avatar
Riot
WHAT DA F?!?! CHEEZITS!?
 
Posts: 6870
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2004 10:23 am

Postby Axel on Tue May 30, 2006 4:28 am

Really i wish I could say something intelligent on this topic, but really what is there to say that would sound intelligent? We're talking about an ice cream cone here. I'd like to take the lid and set it on fire in front of the bastard.
User avatar
Axel
 
Posts: 2853
Joined: Sat Nov 26, 2005 9:46 am
Location: North Carolina

Postby Silas on Tue May 30, 2006 1:46 pm

Riot wrote:Well, I think it's obvious that the globe is going through a stage of warming but I'm more concerned with the pricks that think it's because of humans.


Well if Cowshit and Bananas are making the ice caps melt my name aint Silas.
User avatar
Silas
 
Posts: 2259
Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 6:14 am
Location: Seattle Area

Postby Riot on Tue May 30, 2006 2:30 pm

Silas wrote:
Riot wrote:Well, I think it's obvious that the globe is going through a stage of warming but I'm more concerned with the pricks that think it's because of humans.


Well if Cowshit and Bananas are making the ice caps melt my name aint Silas.


What are you talking about? The earth is just going through another random cycle of warming. It's done it before and it's doing it again. Mars is currently under going a warming trend, as well. Last time I checked, there is no human life on Mars. We are in an orbit and we are just closer to the sun right now (I think).
User avatar
Riot
WHAT DA F?!?! CHEEZITS!?
 
Posts: 6870
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2004 10:23 am

Postby hipn on Wed May 31, 2006 1:29 am

OMG OMG OMG THE END IS NEAR!!!!!!!!!!!! THE SUN IS SUCKING US IN!!!!!!! possibly joking
Image
User avatar
hipn
 
Posts: 2283
Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2005 1:19 am
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Postby benji on Wed May 31, 2006 4:20 am

Silas wrote:Excuse me.... the racist LEFT is afraid of islam? I believe you have your directions confused....

Which political group treats nonwhites as subhumans by beliving they need government help to even make it in life? Which political group focuses endlessly on "race" as an issue and jumps to crying "race" whenever they punch officers of the law? Which political group peddles in race fear in order to keep a bloc that votes in lockstep with them against their best interests? Which political group uses the argument that we shouldn't deal with bad people because it might make them mad, be they criminals, terrorists or congressmen?

That would be The Left.

The Left does not mean "liberal" or "democrat" although most Democrats and people who claim to be "liberals" are members of The Left, as well as a large number of Senate Republicans.

As for the "racism is Right" myth.

Just because you're told "Republicans" are racists doesn't make it true. After all one party was the party of slavery, Jim Crow and opposition to civil rights.

It wasn't the Republican party, it's the Democratic Party. The Republican party was formed as a party in opposition to slavery, and Republicans were the ones who made Civil Right Acts pass, Dems filibustered.

The former and possibily still racist South does "vote Republican" now. But they used to vote 90+% (in some cases 100% in South Carolina) for Democrats when Civil Rights were an issue. Then it was taken care of as a political issue in the 60s and they moved onto other things after the economic murderers row of LBJ/Nixon/Ford/Carter brought us delicious stagflation. They stopped voting in lockstep with one party (voting 60-40 as most "landslide" southern states do is not lockstep, 85+% is) and became politically relevant and now with the also split Midwest have the political weight to match the coasts and thus have become more important.

"Global warming" doesn't mean much to me because it was hotter in the Middle Ages and even hotter 50k years back. A potential half a degree rise over the next thousand years isn't going to bunch my panties. Especially with Greenland and Antartica currently gaining ice.
If Global Warming doesnt get us then religous and race driven war fare will.

Which is why I'm a big fan of rolling up the Islamofascists now. Before they control most of Europe.
User avatar
benji
 
Posts: 14545
Joined: Sat Nov 16, 2002 9:09 am

Postby Silas on Wed May 31, 2006 8:17 am

Ya you put a christian right wing republican in a room with a muslim and a left wing liberal, who's going to assume the muslim is a terrorist? The christian right wing republican, they'll tell them they're going to burn in hell because they dont do what the bible says.

And just so you know the Republican party 150 years ago is MUCH different than the republican party today, Lincoln was a liberal republican, you dont see those anymore, in all reality the parties are practically switched of what they are today.

Like mark twain said, you cant hold the past to the standards of today.

It was the republican right who wanted to go to war and it was the homophobic right that wants to ban gay marriage (for whatever fucking retarded reasons they have for that).
User avatar
Silas
 
Posts: 2259
Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 6:14 am
Location: Seattle Area

Postby Riot on Wed May 31, 2006 9:38 am

Silas wrote:Ya you put a christian right wing republican in a room with a muslim and a left wing liberal, who's going to assume the muslim is a terrorist? The christian right wing republican, they'll tell them they're going to burn in hell because they dont do what the bible says.


How in the world are you going to come to that assumpation? Maybe if you put Pat Robertson in that room, but I don't think the average christian would tell someone they are going to hell because they are Muslim.
User avatar
Riot
WHAT DA F?!?! CHEEZITS!?
 
Posts: 6870
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2004 10:23 am

Postby benji on Wed May 31, 2006 10:56 am

Silas wrote:Ya you put a christian right wing republican in a room with a muslim and a left wing liberal, who's going to assume the muslim is a terrorist? The christian right wing republican, they'll tell them they're going to burn in hell because they dont do what the bible says.

Of course, if that muslim is an extremist he'll have killed them both for not being muslim and refusing to convert.
Lincoln was a liberal republican, you dont see those anymore, in all reality the parties are practically switched of what they are today.

Heh. Whatever. The Democrats of the 1860s were the more statist party, just like today.

There aren't "liberal republicans" anymore? What are John McCain, Arlen Spector, both Bushes, Olympia Snowe? I could go on. Domestically, Bush is more "liberal" than Clinton and his father combined. And in terms of foreign policy, Bush is the truest liberal since Truman. Infact, Bush is cut from the same cloth as Truman and Nixon. "Liberals" at home and liberals abroad.

Which party/group wants to ignore race and which wants to use it to determine a person's need for assistance?
It was the republican right who wanted to go to war and it was the homophobic right that wants to ban gay marriage

I don't know what that has to do with being racist or not but let's discuss these.

Some people are opposed to gay marriage because they find it to be immoral. You might find that intolerant, but aren't you being intolerent when you call them retarded? Do you favor abortion? Because someone might find it retarded to kill babies because they're a bother, and perhaps intolerant to kill people because you don't think they're people.

And it's not the "homophobic right" that wants to ban gay marriage. True, homophobes and members of the "religious right" due and they might overlap. But conservatives as a whole factor as 37% of the population. Yet gay marriage bans pass in blue states like Michigan with 70+% of the vote. Claiming it's just retarded homophobes is minimizing the fact that more people don't want gay marriage than would want a flat tax. I might find that silly, but it's not racist.

Yeah, the "right" did and do support the war. Probably because they aren't afraid of making bad people mad.

Ending the war in Iraq was the simplest foreign policy decision in a long time. Only Afghanistan, and a future Iran conflict are easier ones to make.

9/11 occurs. We're ending terrorist supporting rogue states right?

Iraq supported terrorists, for all intents and purposes led the world (including Messers Kerry, Gore and Clinton) to believe they had WMDs and did infact have means to enact those programs the instant sanctions lifted, were actively attempting to lift sanctions, were violating those sanctions to make money with France and others, were violating 17 UN resolutions and a state of war still existed between us and Iraq since the Gulf War only ended in a cease fire and it was legally broken after Saddam shot at US planes months later. Oh, and Saddam was a jerk who massacred his own people.

Yet some people would have preferred to left him in power and lifted sanctions as a "sign of good faith" for whatever fucking reasons they have for that.

Now back to the beginning of your post.
Ya you put a christian right wing republican in a room with a muslim and a left wing liberal, who's going to assume the muslim is a terrorist?

Let's think about this for a second. Ignore the terrorist part. And talk about The Left approaches Islam.

In the Western world The Left consistantly harps about "income inequality" between sexes, how people want to not allow gays to marry, etc.

They say, you don't want to allow gay marriage? You're an intolerant retarded homophobic facist.

Yet, when in Islamic countries in general, being gay leads to being dead and womens rights are an oxymoron. They say we have to respect their culture and they take umbridge at the Afghanistan and Iraq operations being some of the biggest events in womens rights in the world in some time. Infact, "womens righters" even say things like how we should put the Taliban and Saddam back. Those notorious womens and everyone else rights lovers.

I'm not saying Republicans are great, they've been pretty hideously terrible lately. And I will not be voting at all this November unless they turn it around. I'm just saying the political CW (especially on "racism") is a lot like the "CW" that a teams ppg is the best indicator of offense or defense. And I feel that in this case the CW is making blacks powerless and dooming them to things which are actually not in their best interest.

Whatever. I forgot what I started this post with. Which means it's time to end it.
User avatar
benji
 
Posts: 14545
Joined: Sat Nov 16, 2002 9:09 am

Postby Silas on Wed May 31, 2006 12:17 pm

The Liberals respect peoples right to believe, I think its OK to believe Gay Marriage is bad, but it makes me mad when someone tries to make a law against it because that is clearly in violation of our constitution. It makes no sense how one can be "for gay rights" yet against gay marriage, if it totally ruins the concept of marriage, why doesnt everyone get divorced and stop getting married because every day gays are getting married.

and.....

I hardly see how George Bush, Sr. Or Jr. can be called a "Liberal" Republican. They themselves are the epitome of a conservative republican, they represent the party.

All i can say is that i hope no more C-students from Yale ever try to lead this country again, because America is becoming worse and worse because of it, lets hope this time the 30 odd percent of Americans supporting the Bush Administration dont win the next election....
User avatar
Silas
 
Posts: 2259
Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 6:14 am
Location: Seattle Area

Postby Riot on Wed May 31, 2006 1:38 pm

Silas wrote:All i can say is that i hope no more C-students from Yale ever try to lead this country again, because America is becoming worse and worse because of it, lets hope this time the 30 odd percent of Americans supporting the Bush Administration dont win the next election....


Bush got better grades than John Kerry.
User avatar
Riot
WHAT DA F?!?! CHEEZITS!?
 
Posts: 6870
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2004 10:23 am

Postby MacGuyver on Wed May 31, 2006 1:47 pm

hahaha everyone nowadays is making everythings related of some shit and stuff. oh yeah it does look like a dookie :D
User avatar
MacGuyver
 
Posts: 140
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:47 pm
Location: Pete's office

Postby J@3 on Wed May 31, 2006 1:54 pm

hahaha everyone nowadays is making everythings related of some shit and stuff.


Do you think you could make that related to a coherent sentence :eh:
User avatar
J@3
 
Posts: 19815
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 3:25 pm
Location: MLB

Postby Silas on Wed May 31, 2006 2:50 pm

Riot wrote:Bush got better grades than John Kerry.


I never said he didnt... Though kerry was definitley not the candidate i was hoping the Democratic party would produce, i did feel he was a bit stronger than Bush for the fact that he actually went to war and fought rather than having his father put him in the reserve air national guard, and throughout the debates and speeches, despite his horribly monotone way of speaking, he came off as much more eloquent and obviously smarter. I'd love to see a book of Kerryisms....
User avatar
Silas
 
Posts: 2259
Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 6:14 am
Location: Seattle Area

Postby Blue Nugget on Wed May 31, 2006 8:17 pm

LMFAO Matthew you're killing me! :lol: :lol:
Image
User avatar
Blue Nugget
 
Posts: 444
Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2005 4:09 am

Postby Riot on Wed May 31, 2006 9:43 pm

Silas wrote:
Riot wrote:Bush got better grades than John Kerry.


I never said he didnt... Though kerry was definitley not the candidate i was hoping the Democratic party would produce, i did feel he was a bit stronger than Bush for the fact that he actually went to war and fought rather than having his father put him in the reserve air national guard, and throughout the debates and speeches, despite his horribly monotone way of speaking, he came off as much more eloquent and obviously smarter. I'd love to see a book of Kerryisms....


John Kerry ran the worst Presidental campaign I've ever seen. How can you honestly say he'd be a decent President? The guy is a fool and a loser. The democrats would haev an easier time if they would elect Howard Dean as their candidate. Plus, expect another Republican President in 2008 if the Democrats are so excited about electing a "minority" candidate (Clinton and Obama).
User avatar
Riot
WHAT DA F?!?! CHEEZITS!?
 
Posts: 6870
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2004 10:23 am

Postby Big-D on Wed May 31, 2006 10:19 pm

Riot wrote:
Silas wrote:
Riot wrote:Bush got better grades than John Kerry.


I never said he didnt... Though kerry was definitley not the candidate i was hoping the Democratic party would produce, i did feel he was a bit stronger than Bush for the fact that he actually went to war and fought rather than having his father put him in the reserve air national guard, and throughout the debates and speeches, despite his horribly monotone way of speaking, he came off as much more eloquent and obviously smarter. I'd love to see a book of Kerryisms....


John Kerry ran the worst Presidental campaign I've ever seen. How can you honestly say he'd be a decent President? The guy is a fool and a loser. The democrats would haev an easier time if they would elect Howard Dean as their candidate. Plus, expect another Republican President in 2008 if the Democrats are so excited about electing a "minority" candidate (Clinton and Obama).

Neither of them really appealed to me, but i would have to say bush is better than kerry.Kerry is very indecisive and sly.
Image
User avatar
Big-D
 
Posts: 1939
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2003 9:16 pm

Postby Colin on Thu Jun 01, 2006 6:14 am

Turd Sandwich or Giant Douche?
C#
Image
Pretty Flaco
User avatar
Colin
 
Posts: 5913
Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2003 7:02 am
Location: Van-City

Postby Silas on Thu Jun 01, 2006 8:09 am

I'd say its going to be an even race, unless John McCain runs, in which case he'd win in a landslide. I'd like to so McCain as president, but i feel if he ran he'd probably have to appeal to much to the extreme right wing conservatives to really gain their vote, and the extreme left wing liberals wouldnt vote for him but he'd have a lot of democrats, all the people in between, and a lot of republicans.
User avatar
Silas
 
Posts: 2259
Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 6:14 am
Location: Seattle Area

Previous

Return to Off-Topic

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests