Cyanide wrote:Just a thought, let's just say Beethoven believed God all his life but then got alzheimers, or some disease where he couldn't play music anymore. It would be harder for him to put his trust in God afterwards than if he never believed in God his whole life, recieved that disease then turned to God. Just a little ironic thought. That dilemma reminds me of Job.
Well that depends if he expected God to keep him healthy & in good shape. Believing in God shouldn't mean you expect to go through life on the high-road, on easy street. No, you actually
should (ideally) be the most equipped to deal with difficulties. Like as you said with Job. It is ironic though how sometimes it takes something awful to happen for someone to believe in God, and for someone else all it takes is a little love from the right people
Cyanide wrote:That's the key, though: Societal expectations. Sure, I don't like how society is run these days, but it's how it works. Everybody's competitive, most people are greedy, and if people want to survive in the world, they have to live up to societal expecations to be "successful." It doesn't necessarily translate to happiness, but there is a strong correlation with happiness and wealth, though. It's true that those who are strongly religious do end up happier and are more well behaved, but at the same time, a lot (not all, and definitely not you) are ignorant and close minded into their own bubble without exploring other things or experiencing life beyond its limits, but rather restricting oneself to bound rules. I don't know which side of the coin would be better, but it seems to weigh each other out (i.e. conservatives vs. liberals)
Yes, people have to live in this society and play by its rules to survive, although I personally feel that there are some lines that people should draw as to how far they will get sucked into it. Evil behavior shouldn't be justified just because it's part of a system, even if everyone is using it to "survive." (take slavery in the South, for example- the slave owner were just feeding their families and making a living!- they were still wrong though, and I feel it would have been better for them to be dead broke & poor than to participate in enslaving human beings)
And I agree about what you say about the overty-religious. I have to avoid falling into that trap, too...that's why I don't committ to either Democrat/Republican, Liberal/Conservative label. But you've got to make the separation between God & people who are doing a poor job in representing a healthy faith in Him. Stupid & downright evil behavior by religious people doesn't take away from God's divinity, only religion's (as a earthly system) credibility.
I disagree that there is a strong correlation between money and happiness, though. People in other countries, much poorer material-wise, are far more at peace & are far more happy than the typical stressed out, depressed, lost-in-the-rat-race American.
Cyanide wrote:It's great that you want people to be filled with love and goodness, but are you implying that nobody is filled with love and goodness unless they believe in God? I know people have different ways to be happy and optimistic without having God in their lives. Personally, I think Jesus is somebody that everybody should look up to, but if you look at my belief system as a whole, it's very complex and it can't be summed up to a simple "Roman Catholic" or "Protestant" grouping. PM me if you want to discuss/debate more about beliefs and philosophies. This kind of stuff is what I find very intriguing and interesting.
No, I'm not suggesting that people are only filled with love & goodness if they believe in God...that would be very narrow minded. What I'm saying is that God's love is the
best place from which to find happiness, because of the nature of God as good, all-powerful, merciful, and eternal.
But I must say that I doubt if a person on their deathbed can really be happy if they don't have...well I shouldn't say God, but how about...love? ("God is love" anyway according to the Bible...) You may be teaching me that Love is the bigger picture here, Cy

But you can't go far from talking about love without talking about the source of love, the one who IS love
I also find these debates very intriguing & interesting...are we not allowed to discuss it here, though? Nobody else is around, it seems...
Cyanide wrote:Nobody can prove or disprove God, no matter how credible the "facts" either side presents
yes, that's pretty amazing to me how a claim so ancient cannot be overthrown with all the knowledge we've accumulated & all the technology we have access to...but also it's rough that God cannot be proven. But also, it's supposed to be that way, because God wants us to have faith and show that we want to know Him & stand up for righteousness on earth...
Cyanide wrote: and as for the Church, it'll speed up to modernity regarding issues in homosexuality and feminism, but not under the current pope, which happens to be one of the more conservative popes of our time.
I'm not very up to date on the Catholic church, but it does seem that Christianity as a whole is moving in that direction, hopefully for the be better