Wed Aug 31, 2005 2:52 am
Jae wrote:People are actually looting stores thereWankers.
Wed Aug 31, 2005 3:00 am
Wed Aug 31, 2005 3:03 am
Riot wrote:That would be so cool to be in a blackout.
Wed Aug 31, 2005 3:06 am
Wed Aug 31, 2005 8:09 am
Wed Aug 31, 2005 8:11 am
Legend wrote:On Topic: Looks like the hurricane is headed towards Ontario Full Story
Take cover mafawka's..
Wed Aug 31, 2005 8:13 am
Mazzlowcchi wrote:Legend wrote:On Topic: Looks like the hurricane is headed towards Ontario Full Story
Take cover mafawka's..
Damn, thats gonna pass by me
Wed Aug 31, 2005 8:15 am
Legend wrote:Mazzlowcchi wrote:Legend wrote:On Topic: Looks like the hurricane is headed towards Ontario Full Story
Take cover mafawka's..
Damn, thats gonna pass by me
Better park the bentleys and rolls royce in the garage
Wed Aug 31, 2005 8:18 am
Wed Aug 31, 2005 8:20 am
Fri Sep 02, 2005 1:44 pm
Fri Sep 02, 2005 1:55 pm
Fri Sep 02, 2005 2:07 pm
Fri Sep 02, 2005 2:10 pm
Fri Sep 02, 2005 2:51 pm
Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:02 pm
Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:19 pm
Fri Sep 02, 2005 10:25 pm
Fri Sep 02, 2005 11:18 pm
Riot wrote:Thanks Jae.
Bush cares about the oil because the rest of the country is bitching and moaning about how we have to pay over $3 a gallon for gas.
Sat Sep 03, 2005 7:23 am
Sat Sep 03, 2005 8:16 am
Regarding the levee system in New Orleans, one cannot truly understand how lucky the city was just have the system that was in place without understanding the truly Byzantine structure of New Orleans politics, which requires separate governing boards for each levee that is built.
Rather one agency that is in charge of flood prevention, there are scores. Building in redundancies would have required more boards, which would have lessened the political power of those on the existing boards. I seriously doubt that even now, after this catastrophe, that we in Louisiana will see this system change because the structure is mandated by the Louisiana Constitution. Any change requires not just statewide approval, but must also be approved by a majority of voter in Orleans Parish. Given how many local politicians whose fiefdoms would disappear, that will not happen, and so we will see this disaster occur again.
Sat Sep 03, 2005 8:52 am
benji wrote:The complete stench of your lunacy woke me up over at the other forum and forced me to come here to tell you to knock it off as people are trying to sleep. (Especially since Riot won't talk to me.)
-The Bush Administration did not order anyone to the Convention Center, the Mayor of New Orleans did this, and then he didn't tell FEMA that he did.
-First of all, the Bush Administration has no real say over the levees. True, the DHS not looking into the levee due to terrorist possibility is distressing. True, there was the possiblity for funding to improve the levees, but it would've taken until 2008 before construction even started in a best case scenario. You also need to learn more about the levee system:Regarding the levee system in New Orleans, one cannot truly understand how lucky the city was just have the system that was in place without understanding the truly Byzantine structure of New Orleans politics, which requires separate governing boards for each levee that is built.
Rather one agency that is in charge of flood prevention, there are scores. Building in redundancies would have required more boards, which would have lessened the political power of those on the existing boards. I seriously doubt that even now, after this catastrophe, that we in Louisiana will see this system change because the structure is mandated by the Louisiana Constitution. Any change requires not just statewide approval, but must also be approved by a majority of voter in Orleans Parish. Given how many local politicians whose fiefdoms would disappear, that will not happen, and so we will see this disaster occur again.
-The Bush Administration did not send anyone to the Superdome, again it was the local government. Perhaps you need to learn about federalism. (Some of your other comments imply this is a very strong possibility)
-74.2% of the Army (active duty, Reserves and National Guard) is in the United States. 751,000 troops are here in the United States. 103,000 (or 10.2%) is in Iraq. To imply that because 10% of the force is in Iraq, too many troops have been diverted to Iraq instead of helping here is to imply that you're an idiot. The problem is not that too many troops are in Iraq, but that much of the anarchy is inaccessable at this time (thus, why there is anarchy there).
-If anything, Bush may be to blame for lives saved, as the order for "mandatory evacuation" was not given until after Bush "called and personally appealed for a mandatory evacuation for the low-lying city" to Governor Kathleen Blanco.
Just because you have a visceral and irrational hatred for a man who's done no wrong to you, doesn't mean he's to blame for mother nature and years of infficiency and corruption in the local government of New Orleans. The Constitution gives the President no authority over mother nature.
Stop using any opportunity to attempt to score political points against people you irrationally hate, it's sickening.
All that said. A little joke for my friends here at the NLSC. "Need I remind you that in Louisiana the law is, basically, French. So, it’s really the French who are to blame."
Sat Sep 03, 2005 12:15 pm
benji wrote:The complete stench of your lunacy woke me up over at the other forum and forced me to come here to tell you to knock it off as people are trying to sleep. (Especially since Riot won't talk to me.)
-The Bush Administration did not order anyone to the Convention Center, the Mayor of New Orleans did this, and then he didn't tell FEMA that he did.
-First of all, the Bush Administration has no real say over the levees. True, the DHS not looking into the levee due to terrorist possibility is distressing. True, there was the possiblity for funding to improve the levees, but it would've taken until 2008 before construction even started in a best case scenario. You also need to learn more about the levee system:
-The Bush Administration did not send anyone to the Superdome, again it was the local government. Perhaps you need to learn about federalism. (Some of your other comments imply this is a very strong possibility)
-74.2% of the Army (active duty, Reserves and National Guard) is in the United States. 751,000 troops are here in the United States. 103,000 (or 10.2%) is in Iraq. To imply that because 10% of the force is in Iraq, too many troops have been diverted to Iraq instead of helping here is to imply that you're an idiot. The problem is not that too many troops are in Iraq, but that much of the anarchy is inaccessable at this time (thus, why there is anarchy there).
-If anything, Bush may be to blame for lives saved, as the order for "mandatory evacuation" was not given until after Bush "called and personally appealed for a mandatory evacuation for the low-lying city" to Governor Kathleen Blanco.
Just because you have a visceral and irrational hatred for a man who's done no wrong to you, doesn't mean he's to blame for mother nature and years of infficiency and corruption in the local government of New Orleans. The Constitution gives the President no authority over mother nature.
Stop using any opportunity to attempt to score political points against people you irrationally hate, it's sickening.
All that said. A little joke for my friends here at the NLSC. "Need I remind you that in Louisiana the law is, basically, French. So, it’s really the French who are to blame."
Sat Sep 03, 2005 12:23 pm
Sat Sep 03, 2005 12:29 pm