Tue Apr 12, 2005 10:03 am
Tue Apr 12, 2005 10:20 am
Drex wrote:what if the parent is ready to be a parent that he blames the child for ruining his lifeI'm not sure what you mean here![]()
Tue Apr 12, 2005 10:26 am
So we are suppose to give babies to foster familes everytime the parent doesn't want her kid because she made a mistake or was raped? You do know that Foster Homes are overpopulated as it is, now you are just adding even more kids and the situation worsens.
Tue Apr 12, 2005 10:29 am
They can give it to foster parents. There are a lot of families willing to take a baby. Families that can't have children on their own
don't. He's so American, and Americans help other countries, right? Why don't they (and everybody) send some people to teach africans what can happen if they have sex with little girls??
People that live in the worst conditions when they're kids usually are strongest when they grow up
What the point of having sex? To have kids!!! I know, I know, for some fun...but probably you can do other things to get an orgasm and be safe.
So we are suppose to give babies to foster familes everytime the parent doesn't want her kid because she made a mistake or was raped? You do know that Foster Homes are overpopulated as it is, now you are just adding even more kids and the situation worsens.
Tue Apr 12, 2005 10:35 am
So what do you want to do?? Kill the baby??
Tue Apr 12, 2005 10:36 am
Tue Apr 12, 2005 10:41 am
Tue Apr 12, 2005 10:41 am
Unfortunately there's no agreement in medicine, philosophy or theology as to when life really begins, let alone what stage of foetal development should be associated with the right to life.
That isn't surprising, because the idea that there is a precise moment when a foetus gets the right to live, which it didn't have a few moments earlier feels very strange.
And when you look closely at each of the suggested dates, they do seem either arbitrary or not precise enough to decide whether the unborn should have the right to live.
Tue Apr 12, 2005 10:42 am
Tue Apr 12, 2005 10:49 am
And, what other ways of punishing that people?? Have in their conscience (sp?) that they killed somebody??
What's the "right" circumstance?? Getting raped?? That's probably the only valid point in your whole argument.
Tue Apr 12, 2005 10:51 am
- Think about how many children end up in foster homes and how little families pick them up... as Riot said.... ^
- I read that most of the Africans are so superstitious and 'religious' that they dont accept any western help or teachigns... its hard to enforce what they want to teach those people because alot dont listen... And its not like they havent tried
And the reasons are that they didn't get aborted 'cause their parents weren't ready, or made a mistake??- Must disagree with that... teen suicide is on the rise apparently.. why? The home they live in isnt exactly the best environment to grow up in, it is true that alot of kids live up in the 'hood' and endure hard times but alot of the time they turn to drugs and stuff. And most of the kids who grow up to be successful only struggle financially to get by... the kids im talking about are kids being abused physically by their parents
Ur main point is that u've already done the mistake but why kill the kid u created??? Think about the parents, kid and their futures. You're just screwing them up for life.... how can u live with urself? Soon the world become a worse place because many kids are being raised poorly and we will have crazy babies all over the place.
And if someone does get an abortion... would u send them to jail with murder???
- Exactly and the foster hoems will struggle too to cope with the kids... there will be too many of them. Not just will the Foster homes not cope but the government wont. Taxes will go zooming and the economy will start to fall. The standard of living for whole economies will plummet... Trust me, we will go into a very rapid recession... it wont be too nice![]()
Tue Apr 12, 2005 12:02 pm
It's probably the best interest for the parents, not the future kid. They made something, and now they just want to take it back, by killing their creature.It depends on what is reasonable in the best interests of all parties. If they cant provide the child's right to a healthy life growing up... the parent will be neglecting them. They wont be fulfilling their rights as a parent and give the rights the child holds. And in reasonable forseen circumstances an abortion is the smarter option.
If ur not ready for a kid, then ur not ready... u have a chocie give the kid a horrible horrible life or prvent it.
If they know they won't cope with a kid, why risk themselves?? They'll be avoinding a lot of shit.If they know they wont cope with a kid... why give the Kid a horrid life to live????
OK, it's not a baby, but it's still a human life. And then, a future baby.No, you're killing the fetus. I don't even think it is the fetus yet. In some instances yes, but most women receive abortions soon after finding out that they're pregnant.
Stop saying that it's a baby. Killing babies is wrong. But that's not what's happening. It's pregnancies being terminated. You're clearly over-sentimentalizing it.
Shouldn't that be the fault of their parents, for not knowing what their kids feel like?? I don't know how that relates to abortionAlso, the more crazy kids you have the more school shootings you get!
Yes! Because school shootings result from teen depression.. kids who ar ein hostile homes become depressed and think of stupid ways to get out of the situation!
Even medicine is unsure on the point of when afoetus is actually a human life...
Shortly after conception, a unique DNA code is formed which will remain unchanged through the life of the fetus, and after birth. Scientists define this event as the start of a human organism -- of human life. The presence of a unique human DNA code also signals the start of a human person.
If people aren't educated (like you say) how can they teach others??- Yes, they will become guilty and teach others not to do what tehy did! One of the main ideas of why the legal system is around is prevvention.. preventing others from commiting what is wrong.
- Rape
- Birth Defects
- accidental pregnancy
- danger to mother's health
Just to name four...
The human embryo is not an infant because they are just in a prehuman stage... it is more primitive than a frog or a fish... The embryo can turn into an infant at the mother's choice. They are only a potential human being and therefore destroying the embryo does not constitute to murder!![]()
If we go by your logic, then killing babies and kids also should be part of abortions. They're not fully grown-personsem·bry·o ( P ) Pronunciation Key (mbr-)
n. pl. em·bry·os
An organism in its early stages of development, especially before it has reached a distinctively recognizable form.
An organism at any time before full development, birth, or hatching.
The fertilized egg of a vertebrate animal following cleavage.
In humans, the prefetal product of conception from implantation through the eighth week of development.
Botany. The minute, rudimentary plant contained within a seed or an archegonium.
A rudimentary or beginning stage: “To its founding fathers, the European [Economic] Community was the embryo of the United States of Europe” (Economist).
Tue Apr 12, 2005 12:08 pm
Tue Apr 12, 2005 12:29 pm
Tue Apr 12, 2005 1:59 pm
Tue Apr 12, 2005 8:17 pm
Wed Apr 13, 2005 6:52 am
Why don't they also educate the uneducated? That would solve lots of problems.lol because MISTAKES HAPPEN! And believe it or not, there are people who don't even know what a condom or birth control pill is! You can't just protect the educated, you have to protect the uneducated too as the government of the USA.
How they won't want to put their childrens in foster homes and decide it's better to just kill it (your talking about a born person now). Once again, it was their choice in the begining to have sex. If you are uneducated, it was a "mistake", you just had fun, got drunk, whatever, abortion is not the only choice.Also, in other countries THEY DON'T HAVE FOSTER HOMES and some people don't want to put their child in foster homes. Once again, it's a choice if they want to continue with the pregancy or not.
As I said, they can do other things besides doing abortion. They risk their lives more.I still have a hard time believing you think everyone should be held accountable for their actions despite being naive and uneducated.
Protect! Protect your future citizen. Shit happens, but there's always more than just one way to clean the mess.Shit happens; and as the government of the United States of America their job is to protect everyone...not just the educated.
'cause people are stupid! They do things without thinking of the risks. Also, the world is overpopulated as it is. Wouldn't it be better to have birth control??You say there are a lot of people who are willing to take on babies, if that is the case why are foster homes overpopulated as it is?
If the kids got a good education, they wouldn't be in the position of smuggling. Countries (specially the richest) can do anything when they propose it. If it's their job to protect every citizen, why can't they do something for kids??Think if the foster houses are overpopulated its not gonna decrease our standard of the economy but also will encourage child smuggling which is illegal... this means crime will be rising and so on... please don't make our world a worse place when there are already too many problems to deal with!
Wed Apr 13, 2005 7:05 am
Wed Apr 13, 2005 7:17 am
Wed Apr 13, 2005 7:24 am
Wed Apr 13, 2005 7:35 am
Wed Apr 13, 2005 7:50 am
Wed Apr 13, 2005 8:03 am
Wed Apr 13, 2005 8:25 am
Wed Apr 13, 2005 11:04 am