They get the appeals regardless...
The scary thing is, they overuled it 5-4. That's a lot closer than I want to think about.
No, the scary thing is that they cited unratified international treaties as justification for doing it. They are circumventing the Constitution to enforce their own personal moral judgements.
Lee Malvo, one of the 2002 Beltway Snipers will no longer recieve the death penalty because he was 17 at the time of the crime.
Other ramifications of the decision:
"By striking down Tuesday the death sentence a Missouri jury had imposed on Christopher Simmons – who was 17 on Sept. 8, 1993, when he broke into Shirley Crook’s house, abducted her and threw her, bound and gagged, into a river – the Supreme Court also canceled the death sentences of 72 others for crimes they committed before turning 18.
One of those inmates, Shermaine Ali Johnson, 26, had been awaiting execution in Virginia for a rape and murder he committed in 1994 at age 16. Virginia law set a minimum death-penalty eligibility age at 16, but that is now unconstitutional."
instead of looking @death penalty americans should look at gun laws first.
The third right given in the Bill of Rights is the right to own a gun, third, right after the right to peaceably assemble and petition the Government for a redress of grievances. This right was specifically proscribed so that Government can never take it away. There is no right to free speech in the Constitution, because it is a natural right, and man can never strip natural rights for they are endowed by the Creator. (Jefferson's words, not mine.) Thus, it was needed to create and protect the right to bear arms in the Constitution, for it is a man-made right.