Sun May 04, 2008 7:24 am
Sun May 04, 2008 1:55 pm
Benji wrote:There's only three ways to solve Social Security that I see.
A) It needs to take over everything and the tax needs to be tripled and applicable to all income (I'm not actually opposed to eliminating the cap on it, it's already a tax on the young minority poor for rich old whites.)
Benji wrote:B) An end date for benefits is to be set, with anyone who joins the program after that date is not to receive anything, but will be required to pay the tax. While the program would also not be allowed to be raided for general funds. Two generations or so would have to pay the tax to fund us already in it while getting nothing in return. With the program ending at that point. Ideally, the tax would be made extra-special deductable and slowly drop.
Benji wrote:C) Something along Bush's proposal to begin the gradual weaning off of the program. Allowance of new or recent entrants to defer half/quarter to a private account, with that increasing as benchmarks for the overall program are met.
Benji wrote:Considering there is no way someone just outright ends the program and returns the "pay-in" to everyone still alive, something like a combo of B/C is probably my favor. Ability to "half opt out" and keep the rest in tax-free private account, but receive none of the regular benefits. Until the major pay-offs are done, and then allow full opt-out. Not that I like much for creation of government owned private retirement accounts.
Benji wrote:I just watched some talking heads whining about China, comparing it to Japan in the 80's, etc. I think instead of cutting them off from trade, harming us more than them, we should look to China, Vietnam, etc. as neo-economic models. They're discovering capitalism and rolling back the state dominated industries because they don't care if people are "hurt" as long as it benefits the country. There's a good documentary I can't remember the name of about the "pain" caused by Deng Xiaoping's economic reforms. All the state run industries were losing money like crazy, because they were state run and didn't have to keep real accounting books. He made them act like real businesses, lots of people lost jobs, but we're now seeing the eventual result of that as China becomes an economic power with its free market zones and even state industries that act like real businesses.
Benji wrote:A similar mentality would be prudent towards our entitlements and corporate welfare. Especially with the latest media "crisis" over food due to our fetish for ethanol.
Benji wrote:I'm merely talking about economic mentality, Eastern government mentality is still pretty authoritarian or fascistic. The West isn't any better, we want government to do everything for us. I blame that cripple with polio. And the badass Texan who stole an election. The one that died forty years ago, and held policy meetings in his bed or bathroom.
Matthew wrote:I didn't know I had to give a fuck to post. BTW nice meeting. What was it, 5 days long? Hahaha
Sun May 04, 2008 4:19 pm
Mon May 05, 2008 2:59 pm
Mr. Shane wrote:Matthew wrote:I didn't know I had to give a fuck to post. BTW nice meeting. What was it, 5 days long? Hahaha
You don't have to give a fuck, but why waste your time?
Sun Jul 13, 2008 5:03 pm
me, on the first page, wrote:Cynicism ... we can believe in!
Sun Jul 13, 2008 7:08 pm
Mon Jul 14, 2008 6:20 am
Tue Jul 15, 2008 11:05 am