D Day for baseball.

Other video games, TV shows, movies, general chit-chat...this is an all-purpose off-topic board where you can talk about anything that doesn't have its own dedicated section.

D Day for baseball.

Postby Matthew on Fri Dec 14, 2007 5:23 pm

Well sort of. It was definitive, but there's no answer as to what to do to solve the problem.

Whenever I think of possible solutions my head starts to spin. It would be impossible to punish the players from the past, because it wasn't illegal for them to use performance enhancing drugs at the time (although I'm unsure if it was stipulated in their contracts that they weren't supposed to).

Also, the commissioner was aware of performance enhancing drugs in the sport. It wasn't just the players. Both parties are just as guilty.

But if nothing happens, no records taken back or awards returned, what happens to the players who were clean in that era?

Thats the same problem for labeling it a steroid era. If Pedro goes to the HOF does he get an asterix too just because he played in that era?

None of these players have ever been had a positive test. The only evidence (which is still circumstantial) is if a player purchased performing enhancing drugs. That and eye witness accounts. But with nearly everybody having their own agenda's, is that enough to convict a player?

But just say this is all true, there's no way this sport can regain its creditability with Bud Selig as commish. He was/is just as big a reason for performance enhancing drugs in baseball as Barry Bonds, Roger Clemmons and Jose Canseco.
User avatar
Matthew
 
Posts: 5812
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2002 7:34 pm
Location: Sydney

Postby jonthefon on Sat Dec 15, 2007 7:06 am

Not good.

FUCK YOU MIGUEL TEJADA.
User avatar
jonthefon
Fucking pissed off.
 
Posts: 1598
Joined: Thu Feb 15, 2007 6:16 pm

Postby Ryan on Mon Dec 17, 2007 1:19 pm

Every player named in the report had a chance to sit down with Mitchell and refute the charges of steroid use against them and most of them declined. If you are innocent then why not talk to the guy?
User avatar
Ryan
 
Posts: 1445
Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2005 7:29 am
Location: Michigan

Postby Patr1ck on Mon Dec 17, 2007 2:48 pm

What is the point of this Mitchell Report? To take the mind off of Barry Bond's juiced record by saying lot's of players are doing it or to protect baseball?
Patr1ck
Administrator
Administrator
 
Posts: 13340
Joined: Thu May 19, 2005 5:54 pm
Location: Pasadena, California, US

Postby shadowgrin on Mon Dec 17, 2007 3:24 pm

To show the MLB is actually doing something and not turning a blind eye to juice use to which the league has done for so long.
shadowgrin
Doesn't negotiate with terrorists. NLSC's Jefferson Davis. The Questioneer
 
Posts: 23229
Joined: Thu Dec 12, 2002 6:21 am
Location: In your mind

Postby benji on Mon Dec 17, 2007 3:37 pm

Nah, it's for the Senators and the Federal Government to involve themselves in something else they shouldn't be involved in. MLB clearly failed in policing this, but the federal government now sees itself as "saving America's pasttime" like when it tries to save us from video games.
User avatar
benji
 
Posts: 14545
Joined: Sat Nov 16, 2002 9:09 am


Return to Off-Topic

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests