Woods Voted AP Male Athlete Of Year

Other video games, TV shows, movies, general chit-chat...this is an all-purpose off-topic board where you can talk about anything that doesn't have its own dedicated section.

Woods Voted AP Male Athlete Of Year

Postby 3P on Wed Dec 27, 2006 9:31 am

Woods selected as AP Male Athlete of 2006 in close vote over LT

By DOUG FERGUSON, AP Golf Writer
December 26, 2006

Tiger Woods had an answer for everything.

When he missed the cut at the U.S. Open for the first time in a major -- his first tournament after his father died of cancer -- some questioned whether he could rekindle his desire to dominate. He never finished worse than second in stroke play the rest of the season.

Phil Mickelson emerged anew as a serious threat to Woods' domain by winning his second straight major at the Masters and nearly making it three in a row at the U.S. Open. Woods responded by winning the next two majors without breaking a sweat.

And there remained skepticism about his latest swing change, put to rest by a year that ranked among Woods' best ever on the PGA Tour. He won eight times in 15 starts, six in a row to close out his season, two more majors to reach 12 for his career.

About the only thing he couldn't answer was how he was voted AP Male Athlete of the Year.

Woods won the award over San Diego Chargers running back LaDainian Tomlinson, with tennis great Roger Federer a distant third. The 31-year-old Woods won for the fourth time in his career, tying the record set by Lance Armstrong, who won the last four years.

While pleased to hear he had won the award, Woods was perplexed it did not go to his good friend Federer, who continues to dominate tennis. Woods was in Federer's box at Flushing Meadows when the Swiss star captured the U.S. Open.

"What he's done in tennis, I think, is far greater than what I've done in golf," Woods said. "He's lost what ... five matches in three years? That's pretty good."

Federer actually has lost a few more than that, but not many. His record in 2006 was an amazing 92-5, including 12 singles titles.

Woods received 260 points from sports editors around the country. Tomlinson, who already has set an NFL record of 31 touchdowns with one regular-season game left, was second with 230 points. Federer, who won three Grand Slam titles and lost in the final at the French Open, had 110 points.

Rounding out the top of the list were Miami Heat guard Dwyane Wade (40 points) and St. Louis Cardinals slugger Albert Pujols and NL home run champion Ryan Howard of the Philadelphia Phillies (20 points each).

Fred Couples, the former Masters champion and all-around sports nut who attended Wimbledon this year, ran through the achievements of the top three and figured it would be a tough vote to cast.

"Roger Federer is pretty sporty," Couples said. "Tomlinson is going to pound the record by I don't know how many TDs. It's all great. You would think if you're Roger Federer and you didn't win it this year, you don't know what else you could possibly do. But Tiger ... it's not like he's not deserving. He's winning 55 percent of the tournaments he plays. He's probably ahead of Shaq's free throw percentage."

Woods again made it look routine, winning at least eight PGA Tour events for the third time in his career and becoming the first player in history to capture multiple majors in consecutive seasons.

"Any time you're over 50 percent winning in our sports, it's probably a good year," Woods said. "I know how hard it is. I know what it takes to get to that point. I hate to say it, but people in the media and fans don't understand how hard it is. Players do. The things players have said to me over the years, that means a lot."

What made this year different from others was the magnitude of his loss.

After winning his first two tournaments of the year, the Buick Invitational and the Dubai Desert Classic on the European Tour, Woods' progress slowed as his father's health deteriorated. Earl Woods, the father, architect and driving force behind his son as a person and a player, died May 3.

During a celebration of his father's life in the lobby of the Tiger Woods Learning Center, Woods refused to sit as he listened to stories about his father, his solemn face yielding to an occasional grin whenever someone told a humorous anecdote. He said later he tends to bottle up his emotions, and they burst forth at the British Open.

Using driver only once on the crispy links of Royal Liverpool, Woods won by two shots to become the first player in 23 years with back-to-back wins at the British Open, and the lasting image of his season was Woods sobbing on the shoulder of his caddie, then his wife, realizing it was the first golf victory he couldn't share with his father.

"At that moment, it just came pouring out," he said that day. "And of all the things that my father has meant to me and the game of golf, I just wish he would have seen it one more time."

To this day, Woods said he quickly turns off the tape of British Open highlights when he taps in his final putt.

The rest of the year was a blur of trophies. He overpowered the field at the Buick Open, putted his best at the PGA Championship, outlasted Stewart Cink in a playoff at the Bridgestone Invitational, made two eagles in the first seven holes on his way to a 63 to overcome a three-shot deficit against Vijay Singh at the Deutsche Bank Championship, then won by eight shots at the American Express Championship.

On paper, the results looked familiar. In his heart, Woods said it was his toughest year, which he ultimately described as a loss because of his father's death.

For his peers, it left them at a loss for words.

"We're used to it," Davis Love III said. "People were trying to compare this year to 2000, but 2000 was surprising. Now it's like saying, 'Hey, there's a Ferrari. Oh, there's another Ferrari. There's another Ferrari.' It's an outstanding year, but it's not his only one. If I had a year like his, they would say, 'What an incredible year.' For him, it's just another brilliant year.

"It's hard for him when he wins four tournaments and no majors because people say, 'What in the world happened? That's when you realize how good he is."


I am disaponted. I think Federer should have won, 92-5 is alot more amzing then what Woods did. I am also shock LT was 2nd, Woods and Federer were both more deserving.

Woods tied Lance Armstrong for winning it the most times with 4 apiece. Who's run do you think is more impressive?
3P
 
Posts: 416
Joined: Tue May 02, 2006 9:17 am

Postby bigh0rt on Wed Dec 27, 2006 9:53 am

Tiger is certainly deserving, as is Federer. Those ought to be like 1 and 1A, ordered either way, with Tomlinson drawing 3rd.

As for the Woods vs Armstrong comparison, I look at it as apples to oranges. Woods has distributed continued excellence over the course of an entire season, spanning several seasons, while Lance Armstrong dominated one event, what, seven years in a row, all after coming back from cancer? You have to tip the cap to both of these athletic specimens. They are both a testiment to what is possible through drive and determination, along with a hearty batch of hard work.
User avatar
bigh0rt
NLSC Team Member
NLSC Team Member
 
Posts: 9032
Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2005 5:06 pm
Location: New York

Postby J@3 on Wed Dec 27, 2006 10:27 am

The problem with Federer is that he's so dominant that he probably deserves it every year... I mean it'll be a long time before he has a year where he loses more than 15 games. I'd say they're hanging out for him to win all four grand slams or something.
User avatar
J@3
 
Posts: 19815
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 3:25 pm
Location: MLB

Postby Axel on Wed Dec 27, 2006 10:45 am

This award doesn't mean anything to me. It's almost as if they intentionally give it to individual sport players. Individual sport players have won it 9 out of the past 11 years.

Tiger Woods and Federer play sports where they have no competition at all. Why didn't Tom Brady win it at some point? I don't watch a lot of football, but I know he was the leader for about 3 super bowl wins. Vince Young also had an amazing year. Dwyane Wade? He basically single handedly brought a championship for the Heat.

Tiger is great, but I still don't think Golf really requires that much athletic ability. Talent yes, but not athleticism.
User avatar
Axel
 
Posts: 2853
Joined: Sat Nov 26, 2005 9:46 am
Location: North Carolina

Postby 3P on Wed Dec 27, 2006 10:52 am

Tiger is great, but I still don't think Golf really requires that much athletic ability. Talent yes, but not athleticism.

According to that Larry Bird couldn't win this because he wasn't athletic. What it means by athlete is pro sports player, and if it was athleticism Nate Robinson would win with his Vertical.
Image
3P
 
Posts: 416
Joined: Tue May 02, 2006 9:17 am

Postby bigh0rt on Wed Dec 27, 2006 11:02 am

Axel wrote:This award doesn't mean anything to me. It's almost as if they intentionally give it to individual sport players. Individual sport players have won it 9 out of the past 11 years.

Tiger Woods and Federer play sports where they have no competition at all. Why didn't Tom Brady win it at some point? I don't watch a lot of football, but I know he was the leader for about 3 super bowl wins. Vince Young also had an amazing year. Dwyane Wade? He basically single handedly brought a championship for the Heat.

Tiger is great, but I still don't think Golf really requires that much athletic ability. Talent yes, but not athleticism.


Not to be nit-picky, but Vince Young's year, from a Quarterback standpoint, has somewhat sucked. Sure, the Titans have won a handful of games with him at the helm, but you can hardly credit him with, for example, last week's win where his defense put three touchdowns on the board...

Young's completed 52% of his passes and has a QB Rating better than, in the entire NFL, only Joey Harrington, Bruce Gradkowski, and Andrew Walter (69.7), and is actually lower than some QBs who have lost their jobs due to poor play (Plummer, Johnson). Now, I know he's had some big runs, like the one that beat Houston in OT, and set up the win vs the Giants, but overall, Young has hardly played well on a consistent basis. Not a knock against him, as he's a rookie and has played in a handful of games; but I'm getting tired of everybody jocking him with the new term that people love to throw around "He just wins games."

Furthermore, to say that professional tennis and the PGA have no competition is taking away from two top level sporting fields. That's what spurs the awe in both Tiger and Federer - that they are so far and away blowing out of the water other Class A golfers and tennis players. To say that about somebody in any team sport, where you are dependant on so many other factors, is difficult. Also, it's easy to say that golf doesn't require much athleticism, but I feel that in the next 10 years or so you'll start seeing a lot more golfers fit the 'Tiger mold' of being in incredible shape, lifting more in an effort to improve their game. The days where John Daly types can be successful are likely all behind us, and unless you've played 72 holes in a weekend like these guys do sometimes and walked it all, etc. etc., you can't really appreciate the toll that it does take on you, physically. Again, it's apples and oranges comparing it to 42 minutes on a basketball court, which is also apples and oranges to three sets at Wimbleton, Stage 4 of the Tour de France, and so on and so forth..,
User avatar
bigh0rt
NLSC Team Member
NLSC Team Member
 
Posts: 9032
Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2005 5:06 pm
Location: New York


Return to Off-Topic

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests