Thu May 11, 2006 6:54 am
Thu May 11, 2006 8:30 am
Thu May 11, 2006 5:53 pm
Fri May 12, 2006 5:11 pm
Sat May 13, 2006 6:21 am
Sat May 13, 2006 8:46 am
Sat May 13, 2006 9:35 pm
Qballer wrote:nah I think it's that younger people wanna have sex and don't use birth control... it's stupid.. lazy kids... the last thing I want when I'm around 16-21 yrs old is a baby. why can't we keep our pants on?
Sun May 14, 2006 1:47 pm
tripplemrox wrote:Qballer wrote:nah I think it's that younger people wanna have sex and don't use birth control... it's stupid.. lazy kids... the last thing I want when I'm around 16-21 yrs old is a baby. why can't we keep our pants on?
why not wear a condon, then we dont have to keep our pants on
Sun May 14, 2006 1:57 pm
Sun May 14, 2006 2:32 pm
tripplemrox wrote:Qballer wrote:nah I think it's that younger people wanna have sex and don't use birth control... it's stupid.. lazy kids... the last thing I want when I'm around 16-21 yrs old is a baby. why can't we keep our pants on?
why not wear a condon, then we dont have to keep our pants on
Mon May 15, 2006 11:25 am
The Black Death wrote:tripplemrox wrote:Qballer wrote:nah I think it's that younger people wanna have sex and don't use birth control... it's stupid.. lazy kids... the last thing I want when I'm around 16-21 yrs old is a baby. why can't we keep our pants on?
why not wear a condon, then we dont have to keep our pants on
Dude, regardless, codoms aren't 100% effective. Meh, there's no such thing as "safe" sex. Even if you are protected, that don't stop you from catching STDs. Not to mention you can give and get them from receiving head.
no, double and triple layering them still isn't a guarntee.