Photobucket or Imageshack?

by **Kobe101** on Fri Sep 02, 2005 2:40 pm

Just wondering. I personally like photobucket better. It gives you a list of all your picture youve uploaded and reduces the image sizes. That helps alot for me.

by **zmac** on Fri Sep 02, 2005 2:57 pm

I like most people, i think, only use Imageshack for larger size pics....
Therefore, i think Photobucket is better

by **Emiliano** on Fri Sep 02, 2005 2:59 pm

I mostly use imageshack although both of them are good. Imageshack is just faster. You go to the website and you can upload a pic right on the spot.

by **John WB** on Fri Sep 02, 2005 6:13 pm

I use photobucket for all my sigs and personal photos, but imageshack for all the random images I need hosted.

by **cklitsie** on Fri Sep 02, 2005 8:58 pm

photobucket is better since they dont remove pics from there server and you can find them back at all times. (Y)

imageshack is useful when you need a host but dont want to waste your photobucket space with crap

by **Keo** on Sat Sep 03, 2005 1:26 am

Imageshack if you want a quick upload. Photobucket though is better because it's well organized.

by **J@3** on Sat Sep 03, 2005 2:43 am

If you register with imageshack you can keep track of all the pictures you upload (Y)

by **Colin** on Sat Sep 03, 2005 3:44 am

Jae wrote:If you register with imageshack you can keep track of all the pictures you upload

But I cleared my cookies and now I can't access my account.

I use imageshack, it's easy enough. If I lose an image link I'll just spend 5 seconds and up it again.

by **b_king** on Sat Sep 03, 2005 6:28 am

imageshak is faster and better

by **nbalive744** on Sat Sep 03, 2005 7:13 am

its much faster but i chose photobucket because its more advanced and more detailed and you can get better pics

by **cklitsie** on Sat Sep 03, 2005 7:26 am

Colin wrote:I use imageshack, it's easy enough. If I lose an image link I'll just spend 5 seconds and up it again.

Sometimes you don't happen to have the image anymore. :wink:

by **c0nr4d** on Sat Sep 03, 2005 11:12 am

imageshack, cuz i can keep track of my pics and cuz its faster

by **Colin** on Sat Sep 03, 2005 3:11 pm

ceekay wrote:Sometimes you don't happen to have the image anymore.

Well I have the .psd, and .jpg/.gif/.png of all the photoshop stuff I've ever done on hand. So it's no issue for me.

by **TheFranchise3** on Sat Sep 03, 2005 3:40 pm

if imageshack were to shut down I think id cry because its so easy quick and simple

by **John WB** on Sun Sep 04, 2005 12:04 pm

c0nr4d wrote:imageshack, cuz i can keep track of my pics and cuz its faster

It's faster, yeah. That's one thing I like about it more.

But what's so different about photobucket that you can't keep track of your pics there?

by **nbalive744** on Sun Sep 04, 2005 12:07 pm

you can keep track on both, but it is easier to do it on photobucket

by **hornets_fan** on Sun Sep 04, 2005 1:00 pm

bucket cause u can put more than 1 pic at a time

by **cklitsie** on Sun Sep 04, 2005 9:14 pm

Colin wrote:Well I have the .psd, and .jpg/.gif/.png of all the photoshop stuff I've ever done on hand. So it's no issue for me.

I don't have the disk space to do that. :cry:

by **Fitzy** on Sun Sep 04, 2005 11:16 pm

I've never used photobucket but imageshack is great

by **hornets_fan** on Mon Sep 05, 2005 2:26 am

image for me always gets stuck!

by **nbalive744** on Mon Sep 05, 2005 2:32 am

o yea photobucket is winning, this vote is personal tastes, if you just wanna upload without storage its imagechack, i like photobucket better