Terrorism -- Define It!

I said if that was the reason Bush sent them in the first place then he lied, cuz their still there.
Personally, I don't believe that is the reason, and I don't think it is the U.S.'s business.
Sadaam is not Hitler. One major difference between the two is that the U.S. never funded Hitler.

Uh I hate to burst your bubble but we did go there go remove Saddam's "crew". We got saddam but he still has plently of other people who would follow in his foot-steps. We all knew after we caught Saddam that the war was over and go home. That is just plain ignorance.

It's all about cheap oil. It's a lot easier to get when you've raped and destroyed the country that has it.
When it comes to American politics, they think with their wallet instead of their brain.

Totally agree. DO you guys really believe oil is not behind this? C'mon, wake up!! Some of the US bases in Iraq are named after oil companies such as Ex..n and so on, the pentagon doesn't even bother to lie to americans people anymore.

So, really, wake up. DO you really believe Bush went there to set iraqi people free??? That sounds just ridiculous, do you think Bush cares about iraqis??

Bush rushed into this war before the effects of 9/11 on public opinion lost in intensity. There was no reason not to allow UN inspector to finish their job, instead of bombing right away. But Bush wanted to ride the devastating effects that 9/11 had on Americans and on the rest of the world. Had he waited more months, the entire world would have been against this war.

I think Bush doesn't give a fucking shit about iraqi people, as he doesn't give a shit about Saddam. He wanted the oil, that's it.

Of course he does. Bush isn't a retard he knows you don't send people into war and get killed over oil. As stupid as Bush seems he isn't that idiotic. If he doesn't believe in this war then he wouldn't have called it in the first place. This is setting a statement.

I'm more proud to be American now than ever before. This speaks volume to the Terrorists, mess with us and we fuck you up. We found Saddam, Bin Laden your getting fucked up next.

We found Saddam, Bin Laden your getting fucked up next.

Lol Americans have been saying that for years... he must either be petrified or bored waiting by now

He's fucking his sheep right now...er wives.

See? this is what Bush makes you believe. You are proud to be american because you are fighting for freedom. That's because he told you so (he told us...I live in america too - and BTW, I don't like Kerry either)

The thing is that "freedom" is the most important value in american society, and it has to be...it's a good thing. BUT.....it's always used as a psychological weapon by politics to gain support from american people. Just throw the word "freedom" to justify your actions and Americans will give you a thumb up.

My suggestion is, again, Wake up! I lived in Italy many years and in america for a few years. There is more freedom in Italy than in America. If you had lived in some other country for a while you would see how little freedom you have here in the US.

This is not the "land of the free" and this is not "the war for freedom". They're just brainwashing you. Trust me, I have no interest in lying. I love american people, they are good people. But in this country you have little or no knowledge about the reality in the rest of the world. You are pretty much isolated (for geographical reasons, if you will....and also because you are so powerfull that you can pretty much afford not to care too much about what's going on around you).

But this makes it easy, for people who hold the power, to make you believe anything they want. American media just don't tell the truth or, at the best, they tell you only part of the truth. So, you (meaning: americans) are not to blame for not throughfully understanding what's goin on, because you really don't have the option of choosing a different source of information. You grew up with a mindset ("we are the best, we are the free ones") that is hard to change as it is embedded in years of history of the american society.

I don't want to sound arrogant, I'm just trying to make you think. What if I was right? What if really Bush was only fighting for the oil, pocketed by the American Oil lobby. What if you were a prisoner of a system which is built in such a way to make you think you are free, when you are actually not. I know it sounds like Matrix, but that's just my most honest opinion.

I'm in a movie?

I'm in a movie?

eheh...good one

I'm in a movie?

Riot, how about you actually try giving a rational response to his post?

Of course he does. Bush isn't a retard he knows you don't send people into war and get killed over oil. As stupid as Bush seems he isn't that idiotic. If he doesn't believe in this war then he wouldn't have called it in the first place. This is setting a statement.

I'd say attaining oil and finishing his daddy's work is legit enough for going to war -- at least it is to Bush. What's even more sad is that he tried backing it up through false intelligence and suspicion which has been proved wrong.

I'm more proud to be American now than ever before. This speaks volume to the Terrorists, mess with us and we fuck you up. We found Saddam, Bin Laden your getting fucked up next.

Riot, I bet you're one of those types of people that listens to those country music songs dedicated to the soldiers such as "We'll Stick A Boot In Their Ass" and the one that goes "IRAQ! I rack 'em up and I roll." You probably order Liberty Fries when you go out to restaurants and have an American flag bumper sticker. I hate those people.

magius,


You're absolutely right. I didn't mean to imply that the war is completely justified or anything like that. Perhaps war is really just a "legal" form of terrorism.

The main difference is that terrorism tends to include innocent people as targets whereas war is aimed at governments and leaders but hits innocent people along the way. Obviously, neither is positive, but there are differences (subtle as they may be).

I never took history in high school, but if im not mistaken, the North (backed by russia) would have demolished the south, forcing communisim on the whole country. It would be like nsw and victoria joining forces and taking over all of australia to force communisim.

That's true, not all of Vietnam was pro-communism. It was mostly the parts of Vietnam whose economy was agriculturally based (which happened to be quite a large portion of the country at the time) that favoured communism. Communism isn't suited to countries whose economy is industrially based (like the US and Australia). Ho Chi Minh's intentions were much more honourable than those of say Hitler or Stalin.

The main difference is that terrorism tends to include innocent people as targets whereas war is aimed at governments and leaders but hits innocent people along the way. Obviously, neither is positive, but there are differences (subtle as they may be).

Actually, terrorists do have a history of aiming at political figures along with innocent people. The plane that went down in Pennsylvania on September 11th was reportedly heading towards the White House.

That's true, but like I said terrorists tend to include civilians as targets whereas warfare targets governments and military but the actions end up hurting the civilians. Neither cause spares innocent people from harm.

Ew, Country music sucks. So now I can't be a proud american without being a hick and hated on. Damn you.

Well I'm getting tired of this over-patriotism and arrogance which I notice from some people. I can't believe that people are actually prouder than ever to be American during a time where the majority of the world is against us and our allies have been dropping over the year.

I'm sorry that I want to stand behind my country in a time of war when most nations aren't. I'm so sorry that I want to support the troops, the president and everyone giving efforts during war-fare. I should be more considerate.