Like real basketball, as well as basketball video games? Talk about the NBA, NCAA, and other professional and amateur basketball leagues here.
Thu Jul 01, 2010 10:36 am
http://basketball.realgm.com/src_wireta ... _contract/ Add Richard Jefferson to the list of free agents, likely in the washed-up tier with the likes of Shaq, Jermaine and T-Mac. Baffling decision considering his piss-poor play last season, but great news for the Spurs. He may just get lucky and sign a large deal with a mis-managed team like the Wizards.
Thu Jul 01, 2010 11:09 am
Lol @ Jefferson
Thu Jul 01, 2010 11:15 am
Memo to PaxMan: please do not bring him to Chicago. Certainly not for anything like his previous salary, at any rate.
Thu Jul 01, 2010 11:50 am
there's always the option that jefferson might resign with the nets, who have a lot of cap room and not a lot of interested players to fill it up.
Thu Jul 01, 2010 11:57 am
what a stupid fucking thing to do. why would he opt out with all the major free agents out there? does he think anyone will offer him a better deal? i will take him for league min on the celts
Thu Jul 01, 2010 12:35 pm
If he goes to any team, he'd better hope that there's a Jason Kidd-like player to throw oops to him.
Thu Jul 01, 2010 12:38 pm
Sauru wrote:what a stupid fucking thing to do. why would he opt out with all the major free agents out there? does he think anyone will offer him a better deal? i will take him for league min on the celts
I guess he wants a new deal before the possible lockout next season the same as everyone else, but I agree, he's going to have to rely on a team getting really desperate if he wants another big payday.
Thu Jul 01, 2010 9:39 pm
I laughed when I saw this. This is one of most ill-advised decisions I have ever seen. Great news for Spurs. Funny how the Spurs always seem to come out of most personnel decisions smiling
Thu Jul 01, 2010 10:54 pm
Good decision RJ, you just helped the Spurs
Fri Jul 02, 2010 2:54 am
he just wants to be a part of the Free Agents of nba history.
Fri Jul 02, 2010 4:50 am
yeah but he's putting $15.8mil on the table that he's probably not getting back. the lockout is probably part of the motive for it, but still, he gave up a lot more than he's likely to receive in a new contract.
Fri Jul 02, 2010 5:11 am
what happens to player salaries if they do lock out? do they still get paid or what happens? seems like alot of money to risk when there might not even be a 11/12 season
Fri Jul 02, 2010 6:00 am
well in the immediate future, the players union has advised nba players to negotiate favorable payment schedules over the next year and a half to two years, in order to make sure that they hold out okay throughout the lockout. more relevant though is that owners are complaining that player salaries have grown too quickly over the last decade and outpaced incoming revenue growth, and so league executives will likely be seeking to make cap rules more stringent during the upcoming bargaining process.
Fri Jul 02, 2010 7:02 am
i would love to see a hard cap in the nba myself. drive player salaries down too. so many players not really doing a damn thing making huge sums of money
Fri Jul 02, 2010 7:06 am
Like Rashard Lewis, choking against Boston in the ECF? There's others too, there's too many to name though.
Fri Jul 02, 2010 9:48 am
Sauru wrote:i would love to see a hard cap in the nba myself. drive player salaries down too. so many players not really doing a damn thing making huge sums of money
I don't think a hard cap is really feasible at this point. I don't think we can fairly place all the blame on the players for wanting their fair share of the revenue and maximising their earnings either; it's the same as any other vocation, except the dollar amounts are significantly higher of course. The people signing the cheques and making the personnel decisions also have to share that responsibility.
Fri Jul 02, 2010 10:49 am
oh i dont blame the players at all. if the players can get 100 mil a year for a 6th man then by all means they should. the fault has to land on the owners for allowing it to get so bad
Fri Jul 02, 2010 8:35 pm
Given the crazy free agency market, Jefferson might actually get closer to his foregone salary now any of us could've expected
Fri Jul 02, 2010 9:09 pm
Any explanations on opting out from Richard Jefferson? Just curious...
Fri Jul 02, 2010 10:09 pm
Most likely the long term security of a multi-year deal before the lockout, but possibly more money and/or shots.
Sat Jul 03, 2010 12:08 am
Says he prefers the Knicks and the Nets. I think he could go back to the Nets, because the Knicks already have Gallinari and Chandler. Even more chance if the Nets don't land LeBron.
Sat Jul 03, 2010 12:48 am
he probably thinks he can make it up in the long run and actually see more court time
Sat Jul 03, 2010 12:55 am
Sauru wrote:oh i dont blame the players at all. if the players can get 100 mil a year for a 6th man then by all means they should. the fault has to land on the owners for allowing it to get so bad
Exactly. If someone's willing to pay you outrageous loot, you're not turning it down.
Sat Jul 03, 2010 1:10 am
Martti. wrote:Says he prefers the Knicks and the Nets. I think he could go back to the Nets, because the Knicks already have Gallinari and Chandler. Even more chance if the Nets don't land LeBron.
I would've preferred for the Nets to have a more athletic wing like Rudy Gay or Paul Pierce, but now that those two are off the market, Jefferson at a reasonable price might not be such a bad arrangement. He was decent when he played in New Jersey for the first part of his career.
Sat Jul 03, 2010 10:29 am
So long as they don't go crazy and pay him like they would LeBron or another top tier free agent, it needn't be a terrible move by the Nets if all else falls through. At this stage, I doubt he's anyone's priority though.
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.
phpBB Mobile / SEO by Artodia.