Thu Jun 29, 2006 8:37 am
beau_boy04 wrote:air gordon wrote:the Sam Smith of espn, chad ford, mentions the hot rumor going around is:
Chandler +16th for Murphy, Pietrus, and 9th
this is a no brainer deal Paxson should jump on. Murphy's crapiness is worth trading for if they can get BOTH Pietrus and move up 7 spots.
ironically enough, Fenix, this is the type of deal you dreamed up earlier. and as i said earlier- I think this is too good to be true.
i think Mullin is pushing for some deal invovling Chandler & Murphy but Paxson is in full lowball move and insisting the draft picks be swapped plus Pietrus be included
a little more then 24hrs left until the draft
Why would Golden State trade Murphy and Pietrus and the 9th pick for Chandler and the 16th pick? it doesnt make sense to me at all coz Murphy and Pietrus are both better than Chandler.
Thu Jun 29, 2006 10:41 am
Thu Jun 29, 2006 10:47 am
Thu Jun 29, 2006 11:13 am
Thu Jun 29, 2006 11:20 am
Thu Jun 29, 2006 2:25 pm
Thu Jun 29, 2006 2:31 pm
Fri Jun 30, 2006 12:31 am
c.) Khryapa case. Is a trade involving Deng and a superstar in works?
Fri Jun 30, 2006 12:45 am
Fri Jun 30, 2006 9:20 am
Andrew wrote:I'm not a huge fan of that deal, I don't see how Thomas fits in without getting minutes at the expense of Nocioni and Deng's playing time. The Bulls need to get bigger and they acquire Thomas and Khryapa? I know Pax has drafted well since taking the job but I am second guessing that one....
Well, the Aldridge trade was just made official. I really don't understand that one. If they wanted Thomas, they should have just selected him. Now they've got Khryapa's contract as well. I still don't see how Thomas fits in and if they're planning on trading Nocioni or Deng to make room for him, I think that would be a huge step backwards, almost a Krause-like move.
Fri Jun 30, 2006 2:38 pm
Fri Jun 30, 2006 2:50 pm
Fri Jun 30, 2006 3:08 pm
Fenix wrote:What surprises you.... or that he works out at all? I don't believe until I see the results.
And the problem is, none of those FA doesn't fill a bill of a potential Bulls' centre. They're either injury prone, too old, soft or not athletic enough. A healthy Nene could be fine, but not for 10+ million per. That's why I'm rooting for a move to be made in the whole Kaman situation. Or that we simply wait until next year and then sign Darko.
Fri Jun 30, 2006 3:26 pm
air gordon wrote:Fenix wrote:What surprises you.... or that he works out at all? I don't believe until I see the results.
Tyson has the perceived rep for being a hard worker. Yet Tyson has never come into camp with a post move, better FT shooting, or look noticeable stronger/bulkier. so forgive my pessimism lol
Sat Jul 01, 2006 5:23 pm
Sun Jul 02, 2006 12:28 am
Sun Jul 02, 2006 4:48 pm
Sun Jul 02, 2006 5:17 pm
Fenix wrote:Why I have a feeling that Pax won't listen and will sign this guy ASAP?
Sun Jul 02, 2006 6:44 pm
Mon Jul 03, 2006 12:32 am
Fenix wrote:NO Hornets fans are acting like a PJ Brown for Chandler (plus some fillers) deal is almost done. I'd be ecstatic if that happened. That's size and veteran presence! Bulls are getting soooo 90's.
Mon Jul 03, 2006 1:44 am
Mon Jul 03, 2006 2:02 am
Mon Jul 03, 2006 2:25 am
Dean wrote:That would be a huge steal in my book. Chandler for PJ Brown and JR Smith.
Mon Jul 03, 2006 3:07 pm
Mon Jul 03, 2006 8:12 pm