Q: LeBron also wanted Zydrunas Ilgauskas when he was in Miami, and how did that work out? -- Michael.A: If nothing else, LeBron is loyal to those who have been loyal to him, which is why he requested Ilgauskas' presence with the Heat in 2010, why he wanted Mike Miller with him in both Miami and now Cleveland, and why Jones is headed to Cleveland. That's what happens when a player also is de facto general manager. LeBron has considerable basketball sense, and sway. But it can get difficult for a coach when he knows his star player has personally delivered certain players to the rotation.
NovU wrote:From Ask IraQ: LeBron also wanted Zydrunas Ilgauskas when he was in Miami, and how did that work out? -- Michael.A: If nothing else, LeBron is loyal to those who have been loyal to him, which is why he requested Ilgauskas' presence with the Heat in 2010, why he wanted Mike Miller with him in both Miami and now Cleveland, and why Jones is headed to Cleveland. That's what happens when a player also is de facto general manager. LeBron has considerable basketball sense, and sway. But it can get difficult for a coach when he knows his star player has personally delivered certain players to the rotation.
A league source said on July 17 that the Cavs are now willing to trade the No. 1 overall pick in the 2014 draft.
Wiggins, a 6-foot-8, 194-pounder, has played well at the Las Vegas Summer League, where he’s become a crowd favorite. The former Kansas star has averaged 13.7 points and 3.0 rebounds in the Cavs’ first three games. However, he’s shooting just 37.8 percent from the field.
Up until this point, it was assumed the Cavs wanted to hang onto Wiggins, largely because of comments made by Coach David Blatt.
However, a source said James wants the 6-10, 250-pound Love on the roster.
And, what James wants, he normally gets.
The team did add Andrew Wiggins with the first pick in the draft. Wiggins, though, did not perform well at Kansas last year. And so far in summer league, Wiggins has not impressed. He shot just 34.5% in his first two game.
Yes, I think summer league doesn’t really matter much. But I should note…
- I keep seeing people get excited about a player based on some summer league highlights only to see that a box score result that suggests the player is really not producing (Dante Exum is a good example of this issue).
- Although summer league doesn’t matter much, what Wiggins is doing is consistent with what we saw at Kansas. Wiggins can definitely take shots. Not sure what else he does well. Being “athletic” is simply not the same as being “effective” (i.e. producing wins!).
Assuming Wiggins really doesn’t produce wins in large quantities, it would make sense for the Cavs to think about moving him for a player like Kevin Love. LeBron’s window to win titles is clearly finite. If the Cavs want to win a title with LeBron, the team needs to do what it can to acquire productive talent now (and not hope that Wiggins or the other young players will become productive talent).
LeBron James has reached out to Kevin Love to express his desire to play with him.
NovU wrote:From Ask IraQ: LeBron also wanted Zydrunas Ilgauskas when he was in Miami, and how did that work out? -- Michael.A: If nothing else, LeBron is loyal to those who have been loyal to him, which is why he requested Ilgauskas' presence with the Heat in 2010, why he wanted Mike Miller with him in both Miami and now Cleveland, and why Jones is headed to Cleveland. That's what happens when a player also is de facto general manager. LeBron has considerable basketball sense, and sway. But it can get difficult for a coach when he knows his star player has personally delivered certain players to the rotation.
velvet bliss wrote:lol no wonder LeBron's former BFF Mo Williams got butthurt and depressed when LeBron left Cleveland without him.
Love is like a Picasso. You walk into a store where somebody wants to sell the Picasso for $500, you do not think "Oh, this sucker doesn't know he has a Picasso! I'm going to see if I can get it for $250. I'll wait him out, he clearly wants to sell."
You do not do that. You take out your wallet, and you plop down $500 as fast as you fucking can before someone else walks in the store and yells "Holy shit, a Picasso!" and starts a bidding war that you might lose. Because there are no other picasso's coming on the market any time soon.
NovU wrote:Why Flip Will Lose Love, and Why That Doesn't MatterLove is like a Picasso. You walk into a store where somebody wants to sell the Picasso for $500, you do not think "Oh, this sucker doesn't know he has a Picasso! I'm going to see if I can get it for $250. I'll wait him out, he clearly wants to sell."
You do not do that. You take out your wallet, and you plop down $500 as fast as you fucking can before someone else walks in the store and yells "Holy shit, a Picasso!" and starts a bidding war that you might lose. Because there are no other picasso's coming on the market any time soon.
Kahn is no more in Minnesota. Teams will actually have to open up their wallet.
velvet bliss wrote:Those boxscoregeeks guys are terrible at analogies, not just that article but other articles as well.
It took Andrew one sentence to show how stupid that analogy is.
Sauru wrote:NovU wrote:Why Flip Will Lose Love, and Why That Doesn't MatterLove is like a Picasso. You walk into a store where somebody wants to sell the Picasso for $500, you do not think "Oh, this sucker doesn't know he has a Picasso! I'm going to see if I can get it for $250. I'll wait him out, he clearly wants to sell."
You do not do that. You take out your wallet, and you plop down $500 as fast as you fucking can before someone else walks in the store and yells "Holy shit, a Picasso!" and starts a bidding war that you might lose. Because there are no other picasso's coming on the market any time soon.
Kahn is no more in Minnesota. Teams will actually have to open up their wallet.
these 2 things do not relate. you should use something like a house for a better example. say you really want a guys house and he wants 300k for it but you want to only give him 200k because he is 6 months behind and very close to foreclosure. he says "no way this house is amazing i will take no less than 300k (or if you are the wolves you ask for 400k) and i refuse to budge on price" so now the guy says well screw him i will wait til he loses the house and i can pick it up for 100k.
now of course someone could come along and offer the 300k for the house but then the man could just find another house thats almost just as could (possible even fit his needs better) without having to pay more than he was willing to pay
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests