air gordon wrote:aside from the amount of time between the games- what's wrong with the playoffs again?
Sorry AG, I forgot to respond to this thread when it got pushed down. Pdub got most of it though.
Pdub wrote:Lots of things since the West and East seeds are considered as if they are separate leagues. If one conference is just horrible, bad teams get into the playoffs, and if the other conference is a power house, lots of good teams don't make it to the playoffs. Overall seeding in general, plus the "different" way the games are officiated.
The most important thing for some is this. It's not even entirely about the bad teams making it. It's that it makes it that much easier for the teams in the bad conference to get through unhindered. If you're playing 35-40 win teams in the first two rounds, and you're a 55-60 win team, you're coasting. Meanwhile, the other conference is facing 50+ wins. Every. Single. Round.
This created an imbalance in which teams in the East were not facing a real series until the Conference Finals, while the most of the West was slogging through major series in every round. There are people (with fancy math degrees from dem fancy universities) who believe this was the reason for the Pistons and Heat's "easy" titles.
I don't entirely buy into that, I think it plays a factor, but I think injuries can matter more. (Although not playing tough opponents can save you on injuries since you can rest your stars.)
Ultimately, I do think a sixteen team conference-free field would improve things. For one, it'd give reason to not just win your division and conference, but to out pace others. You'd lose incentive to not play all the way through the season if it means 66 wins and #1 versus 62 and the #3 seed. And as you mention, the time between games basically eliminates this issue anymore. If we're going to take an entire month to play a series (and have things like NO/MEM vs. POR anyway), and with modern travel and luxuries, there's no reason we need to pretend you can't do cross-country series from round one.
People bring up "rivalries" but those are either dead or so unlikely it's irrelevant. Boston and LA's rivalry came and was reignited because they were the two best teams, not because they were in two separate conferences.