NBA Finals 2008: Lakers vs Celtics

never really understood the term "act black". does acting black mean listening to rap? swearing? talking entirely in slang? pants that dont fit? gotta limp everywhere? cause if so i see more white people "acting black" than black people



edit: fixed the worst typo ever

Last edited by Sauru on Mon Jun 23, 2008 8:38 am, edited 1 time in total.

Do you honestly believe the cavaliers have a good shot at winning next year? No? good then.[/i]

I never said that. I do think the Cavs chances of winning it all next year is pretty good too. With Bynum back, the Lakers should be a better team considering that they still have a pretty young core.

There are unquestionably some bad calls in the NBA as there are in a lot of sports but they also happen in regular season games which don't necessarily have much impact on the outcome of the season. They don't stand out as much though because the games don't carry as much weight.

If the league is rigging the Playoffs year-in, year-out by way of shading officiating, they could be doing a much better job of it. They could have have Lakers/Celtics in 2002 but didn't. They also could have done Lakers/Knicks in 2000 but that's not the way it went down. Matchups such as Spurs/Nets and Spurs/Pistons don't exactly match a pattern of getting the biggest markets or most widely popular teams into the Finals either.

That's the plan, to make people think it's not rigged. They used the Spurs & Pistons and now everyone will say what you just said.

Can't you see? Now it'll be Lakers - Celtics for another 10 years and then they'll give the Bobcats and the Raptors a chance and then the Knicks and Chicago will battle it out in the East etc, etc.

Just admit it, you know the NBA is rigged.

I would, but the "loyalty" chip they implanted prevents me from revealing what I know about the conspiracy.

never really understood the term "act black". does acting black mean listening to rape? swearing? talking entirely in slang? pants that dont fit? gotta limp everywhere? cause if so i see more white people "acting black" than black people

That's because you are from Boston, the most racist city in the country is ironicly filled with white wanna be gangstas.

never really understood the term "act black". does acting black mean listening to rape? swearing? talking entirely in slang? pants that dont fit? gotta limp everywhere? cause if so i see more white people "acting black" than black people

yes i do see more white ppl act black tthan actual black ppl
btw we don't list to RAPE, it's call Rap

That's the plan, to make people think it's not rigged. They used the Spurs & Pistons and now everyone will say what you just said.

Can't you see? Now it'll be Lakers - Celtics for another 10 years and then they'll give the Bobcats and the Raptors a chance and then the Knicks and Chicago will battle it out in the East etc, etc.

Just admit it, you know the NBA is rigged.

Exactly, they can't be obvious with it, but sometimes it's ass clear as Blackand White

btw we don't list to RAPE, it's call Rap

Shit; that is pretty much all rap music is about these days anyway.

Exactly, they can't be obvious with it, but sometimes it's ass clear as Blackand White

Go Bynum

btw we don't list to RAPE, it's call Rap

Shit; that is pretty much all rap music is about these days anyway.

Really?..name 2 rap songs that came out "these days" that are about rape while I sit here and wait with my bullshit goggles on. I know you'll know the answer because only someone who obviously listens to alot of today's rap music would say something like that.

Heh, I knew that post would piss someone off.

Well hey...kudos to you.

Exactly, they can't be obvious with it, but sometimes it's ass clear as Blackand White

ohhhhhh
now i get it, ur being sarcastic, wow now i get it

^ Kindly explain sarcastic plz.

edit: fixed the worst typo ever

Face it, your non-capitalization is now affecting your typing skills.

They could have have Lakers/Celtics in 2002 but didn't. They also could have done Lakers/Knicks in 2000 but that's not the way it went down.

That's because the NBA doesn't want an Antoine Walker led team to reach the Finals. Miami was ok because he's only a roleplayer on that team, not the superstar.

Knicks in 2000 wouldn't do either. The league owes Larry Bird and Indiana in exchange for letting the Bulls past them during their series in 1998.

does anyone remeber i think Game 2 of the finals, where Powe had an explosive game, 12pts in about 10 mins, got a ton of rebs/blocks, e.t.c, during the halftime, they show a special documentary of Powe, about where he's from, what hes been through and his childhood(was actually a very touching story)
i just want to know is it just a coincedence(i didn't like my english teacher ) that he played good on the day they showed the video or it was because he played good they showed it?

I presume they would have planned to run that as the halftime story ahead of time so I'd say it was a coincidence.

What the hell is this?

What part is the difference? i cant see clearly

Haven't you already posted this?

If you hit 'Play Now' you'd figure out that it's just a simple game, where you have to spot differences in two Finals related pics. Like in this example, the towel his green-white on the left, and only green on the right.

Haven't you already posted this?

I posted a similar one where the magnifying glass was on his crotch area. I swear, they make terrible ads.