Main Site | Forum | Rules | Downloads | Wiki | Features | Podcast

NLSC Forum

Like real basketball, as well as basketball video games? Talk about the NBA, NCAA, and other professional and amateur basketball leagues here.
Post a reply

Re: Jefferson for Stoudemire in the works

Mon Jun 22, 2009 10:02 pm

Same with Big Al . . .

Where's the stat dude ? ( is that benji ? )
Need some clarifications here .

Re: Jefferson for Stoudemire in the works

Mon Jun 22, 2009 10:05 pm

MikeMan™ wrote:
dopeboy23 wrote:Jefferson is on a team where he's the only reliable scorer. He does a lot more than he should. Put Amare on a team where there's no help from other guys, and only then you can start talking about him being overrated.


Amare' is not a reliable scorer .
No-Post Up Game .
No Moves What so ever . etc . . .

How can you be a reliable scorer when all you can do is pick n roll ?


Are you drunk or what?????

Not a reliable scorer???????????
No post up game???????????????
no moves???????????

If he doesn't play good for you on your x-box it doesn't mean it is like real life damn, you don't know shit about basketball.

Re: Jefferson for Stoudemire in the works

Mon Jun 22, 2009 10:08 pm

What do you mean with ''Same with Big Al''? He plays completely different game than Amare - mostly post up game, mediocre mid range J, doesn't get to the line often.

Re: Jefferson for Stoudemire in the works

Mon Jun 22, 2009 10:10 pm

Amare' a post-up player ?
When did that happen ?

Amare' moves looks downright ugly compared to Big Al's Duncan-like post play .

Not a reliable scorer . . .
Only thrives in Run n Gun , no flexibility . . .
Only plays effectively with Steve Nash . . .

Re: Jefferson for Stoudemire in the works

Mon Jun 22, 2009 10:13 pm

Check your stats or whatever before saying that Amare plays effectively only with Nash. Duncan-like? Poor man's Duncan maybe, not anything more.

Re: Jefferson for Stoudemire in the works

Mon Jun 22, 2009 10:15 pm

MikeMan™ wrote:Amare' a post-up player ?
When did that happen ?

Amare' moves looks downright ugly compared to Big Al's Duncan-like post play .

Not a reliable scorer . . .
Only thrives in Run n Gun , no flexibility . . .
Only plays effectively with Steve Nash . . .


Another evidence you didn't watch a single NBA Suns game.
20 + ppg is not reliable ???
No flexibility???, why is he averaging 25+ points since Shaq came and they changed their style of play?????
With Steve Nash??? Oh and Big Al can dribble his way to the basket without anyone passing the ball in the low post to him?????
Amare is quick, Al is not, Amare is strong, Al is strong but less stronger than Amare, Amare is a beast, Al has a potential of being one,

Re: Jefferson for Stoudemire in the works

Mon Jun 22, 2009 10:19 pm

getred12 wrote:Not really. He has a shooting range, about 15-18 feet


dopeboy23 wrote:What do you mean with ''Same with Big Al''?


Amare' has a 15-18 foot unreliable jumpshot " Same with Big Al " .

dopeboy23 wrote:Poor Man's Duncan


Maybe yes defensively , but not offensively . . .
Big Al has quite excellent footwork , low-post moves etc .
Last edited by MikeMan™ on Mon Jun 22, 2009 10:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Re: Jefferson for Stoudemire in the works

Mon Jun 22, 2009 10:21 pm

Big Al shoots brick moron

EDIT: I was meaning on mid range shots, his inside game is good

Re: Jefferson for Stoudemire in the works

Mon Jun 22, 2009 10:22 pm

MikeMan™ wrote:shadowgrin I'm not motivated , I need something to motivate me to do that . . .

You're not motivated or you're just spewing bullshite out of your ass again that's why you're unable to compare them?

Re: Jefferson for Stoudemire in the works

Mon Jun 22, 2009 10:25 pm

Amare doesn't have an unreliable J. He doesn't take as many shots as he could, just because he doesn't need that to score 20+ ppg. Check his stats. Please..

Re: Jefferson for Stoudemire in the works

Mon Jun 22, 2009 10:29 pm

shadowgrin wrote:why you're unable to compare them?


Long post to post buddy . . .

Re: Jefferson for Stoudemire in the works

Mon Jun 22, 2009 10:32 pm

MikeMan™ wrote:
shadowgrin wrote:why you're unable to compare them?


Long post to post buddy . . .


Are you being this dumb on purpose Mike Man????

ShadowGrin said a full sentence dumbass

You're not motivated or you're just spewing bullshite out of your ass again that's why you're unable to compare them?

Re: Jefferson for Stoudemire in the works

Mon Jun 22, 2009 10:35 pm

Long post or you really are just unable to do it like you claim you can?

The numerous replies in this thread you posted when combined can already be considered a long post so I don't think the reason of it's a "long post" is a good excuse on your part to cover your laziness or ignorance, which I think is the latter.

EDIT: I fucked up with the editing and new posting
Last edited by shadowgrin on Mon Jun 22, 2009 10:44 pm, edited 3 times in total.

Re: Jefferson for Stoudemire in the works

Mon Jun 22, 2009 10:37 pm

mandich wrote:
ShadowGrin said a full sentence dumbass


Nice reply there Einstein .
Don't post if you can't read moron .
What I mean is if I would to compare Amare' to Big Al and vice versa you guys will see a long post .

Re: Jefferson for Stoudemire in the works

Mon Jun 22, 2009 10:38 pm

shadowgrin wrote:laziness


You got me there shadow . (Y)

Re: Jefferson for Stoudemire in the works

Mon Jun 22, 2009 10:40 pm

What I mean is if I would to compare Amare' to Big Al and vice versa you guys will see a long post . Don't post if you can't read moron .


But u weren't comparing them, you were just bullshiting that Al is better, kid go back to school and see if they accept retards like you

Re: Jefferson for Stoudemire in the works

Mon Jun 22, 2009 10:43 pm

Yeah that's right moving away from the truth . . .
You just can't accept that you were wrong on your reply bitch . . .

Re: Jefferson for Stoudemire in the works

Mon Jun 22, 2009 10:43 pm

Damn, I'm arguing with one of the biggest idiots on NLSC, guess that makes me one of them :oops:
Mike Man, Stoudemire is better, case closed

Re: Jefferson for Stoudemire in the works

Mon Jun 22, 2009 10:45 pm

MikeMan™ wrote:You got me there shadow . (Y)

You don't get it:

The numerous replies in this thread you posted when combined can already be considered a long post so I don't think the reason of it's a "long post" is a good excuse on your part to cover your laziness or ignorance, which I think is the latter.


You have already made a lot of posts in this thread so don't think it's true that you are lazy to make a "long post" comparing them.
You are just hiding your ignorance behind the silly excuse of laziness.
Last edited by shadowgrin on Mon Jun 22, 2009 10:48 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Re: Jefferson for Stoudemire in the works

Mon Jun 22, 2009 10:45 pm

MikeMan™, Oh fuck I really didn't get it. I thought you were taunting Shadowgrin that he posted a "long" post. My bad, but still you are a dumbass that doesn't know shit about basketball :mrgreen:

Re: Jefferson for Stoudemire in the works

Mon Jun 22, 2009 10:46 pm

That's your own opinion . . .

- I still don't want this trade to happen unless Shaq also gets traded . Shaq Daddy will clog Big Al's paint .

Re: Jefferson for Stoudemire in the works

Tue Jun 23, 2009 1:21 am

Calm down guys, the MikeMan special bus is really starting to run out of gas quickly.

Re: Jefferson for Stoudemire in the works

Tue Jun 23, 2009 2:07 am

mandich wrote:MikeMan™, Oh fuck I really didn't get it. I thought you were taunting Shadowgrin that he posted a "long" post. My bad, but still you are a dumbass that doesn't know shit about basketball :mrgreen:


Hey , why don't the " Edited by mandich in . . . " show up ?

Re: Jefferson for Stoudemire in the works

Tue Jun 23, 2009 2:19 am

Because he really thinks that "you are a dumbass that doesn't know shit about basketball"

His words, not mine.

Re: Jefferson for Stoudemire in the works

Tue Jun 23, 2009 2:24 am

I'm really enlightened with your answer . . .

- and is that a " Forum Glitch " or something !?
Post a reply