Thu Apr 06, 2006 8:04 am
Laxation wrote:benji wrote:Because it's the only logical conclusion one can gather from you saying that somehow the stats aren't telling the whole story on the Knicks rebounding. That somehow despite their fourth place standing, they're actually a bad rebounding team.
Besides, your username implies more than whatever you actually said.
What I said was that stats can be deceiving... you can take whatever the fuck you want out of that.
it's more like you are saying "i have nothing to negate/disprove what you said in your previous post. but i will use the all too popular blanket statement of 'stats can be misleading'.
Thu Apr 06, 2006 6:04 pm
air gordon wrote:Laxation wrote:benji wrote:Because it's the only logical conclusion one can gather from you saying that somehow the stats aren't telling the whole story on the Knicks rebounding. That somehow despite their fourth place standing, they're actually a bad rebounding team.
Besides, your username implies more than whatever you actually said.
What I said was that stats can be deceiving... you can take whatever the fuck you want out of that.
it's more like you are saying "i have nothing to negate/disprove what you said in your previous post. but i will use the all too popular blanket statement of 'stats can be misleading'.
Why bother saying something, if you have no idea what the fuck was said beforehand?
I can only assume you skipped to the end of the topic or you wouldnt have said that, because what I said was not a defeatest comment. Previously, I had said that stats can be decieving, but in different words. Somehow this was misinterpreted by Benji in such a way that can only be described by my name, 'Laxation'
So I reiterated myself to explain to him what I meant previously, also hoping for an explanation as to what Laxation has to do with what I was implying.
Happy now?